{"title":"模仿,或“社会就是模仿”","authors":"A. Seligman, R. Weller","doi":"10.1093/OSO/9780190888718.003.0004","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The heart of mimesis is a set of shared conventions rather than shared beliefs or shared memory. The repetition of mimesis gives it the character of something eternally present. This gives mimesis a much greater potential for openness than memory does. Unlike the past-continuous of memory, mimesis creates a kind of present-continuous. This chapter focuses on conflict around the reading of mimesis as memory or metaphor in different social contexts. These conflicts occur when frames clash, or when one powerful frame creates a double bind and puts people into an impossible situation. The chapter further explores the “imperialist” tendencies of mimesis to rewrite all other frames of meaning.","PeriodicalId":448079,"journal":{"name":"How Things Count as the Same","volume":"58 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2018-12-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Mimesis, or “Society Is Imitation”\",\"authors\":\"A. Seligman, R. Weller\",\"doi\":\"10.1093/OSO/9780190888718.003.0004\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"The heart of mimesis is a set of shared conventions rather than shared beliefs or shared memory. The repetition of mimesis gives it the character of something eternally present. This gives mimesis a much greater potential for openness than memory does. Unlike the past-continuous of memory, mimesis creates a kind of present-continuous. This chapter focuses on conflict around the reading of mimesis as memory or metaphor in different social contexts. These conflicts occur when frames clash, or when one powerful frame creates a double bind and puts people into an impossible situation. The chapter further explores the “imperialist” tendencies of mimesis to rewrite all other frames of meaning.\",\"PeriodicalId\":448079,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"How Things Count as the Same\",\"volume\":\"58 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2018-12-20\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"How Things Count as the Same\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1093/OSO/9780190888718.003.0004\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"How Things Count as the Same","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/OSO/9780190888718.003.0004","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
The heart of mimesis is a set of shared conventions rather than shared beliefs or shared memory. The repetition of mimesis gives it the character of something eternally present. This gives mimesis a much greater potential for openness than memory does. Unlike the past-continuous of memory, mimesis creates a kind of present-continuous. This chapter focuses on conflict around the reading of mimesis as memory or metaphor in different social contexts. These conflicts occur when frames clash, or when one powerful frame creates a double bind and puts people into an impossible situation. The chapter further explores the “imperialist” tendencies of mimesis to rewrite all other frames of meaning.