基于软件体系结构的可靠性工作的分类

Atef Mohamed, Mohammad Zulkernine
{"title":"基于软件体系结构的可靠性工作的分类","authors":"Atef Mohamed, Mohammad Zulkernine","doi":"10.1145/1833335.1833342","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Due to the complexity of the current software systems and the diversity of their architectural styles and component models, architecture-based reliability is becoming a more important quality requirement than ever before. Architecture-based reliability efforts depend on the behavior of individual components and their interactions with respect to their influences on the system reliability. Depending on different viewpoints and assumptions, a component takes various definitions and forms. As a result, numerous reliability works that involve varieties of the underlying strategies, objectives, and parameters are proposed for software architectures. Classifying these efforts is important for creating and selecting potential solutions that handle the reliability of software applications. In this paper, we provide a taxonomy of architecture-based reliability efforts. We classify these efforts according to the reliability goals, component abstraction, and level of granularity. We explain the existing techniques considering their assumptions with respect to these classification parameters and provide detailed description about the specific issues and considerations of each class.","PeriodicalId":325791,"journal":{"name":"Sharing and Reusing Architectural Knowledge","volume":"16 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2010-05-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"9","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"A taxonomy of software architecture-based reliability efforts\",\"authors\":\"Atef Mohamed, Mohammad Zulkernine\",\"doi\":\"10.1145/1833335.1833342\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Due to the complexity of the current software systems and the diversity of their architectural styles and component models, architecture-based reliability is becoming a more important quality requirement than ever before. Architecture-based reliability efforts depend on the behavior of individual components and their interactions with respect to their influences on the system reliability. Depending on different viewpoints and assumptions, a component takes various definitions and forms. As a result, numerous reliability works that involve varieties of the underlying strategies, objectives, and parameters are proposed for software architectures. Classifying these efforts is important for creating and selecting potential solutions that handle the reliability of software applications. In this paper, we provide a taxonomy of architecture-based reliability efforts. We classify these efforts according to the reliability goals, component abstraction, and level of granularity. We explain the existing techniques considering their assumptions with respect to these classification parameters and provide detailed description about the specific issues and considerations of each class.\",\"PeriodicalId\":325791,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Sharing and Reusing Architectural Knowledge\",\"volume\":\"16 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2010-05-02\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"9\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Sharing and Reusing Architectural Knowledge\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1145/1833335.1833342\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Sharing and Reusing Architectural Knowledge","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1145/1833335.1833342","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 9

摘要

由于当前软件系统的复杂性及其体系结构风格和组件模型的多样性,基于体系结构的可靠性正成为比以往任何时候都更重要的质量要求。基于体系结构的可靠性工作依赖于单个组件的行为以及它们对系统可靠性的影响方面的相互作用。根据不同的观点和假设,组件有不同的定义和形式。因此,为软件架构提出了许多涉及各种底层策略、目标和参数的可靠性工作。对这些工作进行分类对于创建和选择处理软件应用程序可靠性的潜在解决方案非常重要。在本文中,我们提供了基于体系结构的可靠性工作的分类。我们根据可靠性目标、组件抽象和粒度级别对这些工作进行分类。我们解释了现有的技术,考虑到它们对这些分类参数的假设,并详细描述了每个类别的具体问题和考虑因素。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
A taxonomy of software architecture-based reliability efforts
Due to the complexity of the current software systems and the diversity of their architectural styles and component models, architecture-based reliability is becoming a more important quality requirement than ever before. Architecture-based reliability efforts depend on the behavior of individual components and their interactions with respect to their influences on the system reliability. Depending on different viewpoints and assumptions, a component takes various definitions and forms. As a result, numerous reliability works that involve varieties of the underlying strategies, objectives, and parameters are proposed for software architectures. Classifying these efforts is important for creating and selecting potential solutions that handle the reliability of software applications. In this paper, we provide a taxonomy of architecture-based reliability efforts. We classify these efforts according to the reliability goals, component abstraction, and level of granularity. We explain the existing techniques considering their assumptions with respect to these classification parameters and provide detailed description about the specific issues and considerations of each class.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信