{"title":"德语承包了盲文的一些方面","authors":"Karl Britz","doi":"10.1145/964104.964116","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"In the older system, it was very important to label contractions, which was done mainly by a hyphen . If thi s contraction was part of a larger word, this hyphen had to be put before and behind the contraction . In the new system both hyphens are omitted . Contractions composed of two signs can be applied without any precautions . We have contraction s consisting of two as well as of one character and the contractions consisting of one character now have to be preceded b y dot 2 if they are part of a larger word . Of course if they occur as a single word, for instance the word \"end\", only a \"u \" is written between two blank cells . This is a very great simplification and it is now possible because of this and othe r simplifications also to learn the new system within three weeks, which is a fraction of the time necessary before the change s were made . Reading is nearly the same as it was, but writing is easier than it was before . What the computer is producin g is especially well-readable and it is so good that we intend to produce not only magazines but also books in this way . I wish to mention one thing about the contractions . I have mentioned before in the discussions that we have about 400 contractions in the lists ; 300 are taken from the old system and about 100 new contractions have been added . Fortunately, shortly before the first system was developed, a large count had been taken by Keding . He counted 2 million Germa n words from miscellaneous texts, counted the frequency of a great many of them, and listed those which occurred a t least 10 times . The first list of contractions was based on this count with the effect that the most frequently used word s have been contracted, which was very effective . Unfortunately, there is no new count, and when searching for ne w contractions the old lists (now nearly 100 years old) had to be used . The language, however, has changed only in some certain aspects and most of the frequency counts found 100 years ago are still fairly reliable . Selecting new contractions , we looked for the frequencies of them in the lists and for the abbreviation effect .","PeriodicalId":105690,"journal":{"name":"ACM Sigcaph Computers and The Physically Handicapped","volume":"46 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1975-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Some aspects of German contracted Braille\",\"authors\":\"Karl Britz\",\"doi\":\"10.1145/964104.964116\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"In the older system, it was very important to label contractions, which was done mainly by a hyphen . If thi s contraction was part of a larger word, this hyphen had to be put before and behind the contraction . In the new system both hyphens are omitted . Contractions composed of two signs can be applied without any precautions . We have contraction s consisting of two as well as of one character and the contractions consisting of one character now have to be preceded b y dot 2 if they are part of a larger word . Of course if they occur as a single word, for instance the word \\\"end\\\", only a \\\"u \\\" is written between two blank cells . This is a very great simplification and it is now possible because of this and othe r simplifications also to learn the new system within three weeks, which is a fraction of the time necessary before the change s were made . Reading is nearly the same as it was, but writing is easier than it was before . What the computer is producin g is especially well-readable and it is so good that we intend to produce not only magazines but also books in this way . I wish to mention one thing about the contractions . I have mentioned before in the discussions that we have about 400 contractions in the lists ; 300 are taken from the old system and about 100 new contractions have been added . Fortunately, shortly before the first system was developed, a large count had been taken by Keding . He counted 2 million Germa n words from miscellaneous texts, counted the frequency of a great many of them, and listed those which occurred a t least 10 times . The first list of contractions was based on this count with the effect that the most frequently used word s have been contracted, which was very effective . Unfortunately, there is no new count, and when searching for ne w contractions the old lists (now nearly 100 years old) had to be used . The language, however, has changed only in some certain aspects and most of the frequency counts found 100 years ago are still fairly reliable . Selecting new contractions , we looked for the frequencies of them in the lists and for the abbreviation effect .\",\"PeriodicalId\":105690,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"ACM Sigcaph Computers and The Physically Handicapped\",\"volume\":\"46 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"1975-03-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"ACM Sigcaph Computers and The Physically Handicapped\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1145/964104.964116\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"ACM Sigcaph Computers and The Physically Handicapped","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1145/964104.964116","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
In the older system, it was very important to label contractions, which was done mainly by a hyphen . If thi s contraction was part of a larger word, this hyphen had to be put before and behind the contraction . In the new system both hyphens are omitted . Contractions composed of two signs can be applied without any precautions . We have contraction s consisting of two as well as of one character and the contractions consisting of one character now have to be preceded b y dot 2 if they are part of a larger word . Of course if they occur as a single word, for instance the word "end", only a "u " is written between two blank cells . This is a very great simplification and it is now possible because of this and othe r simplifications also to learn the new system within three weeks, which is a fraction of the time necessary before the change s were made . Reading is nearly the same as it was, but writing is easier than it was before . What the computer is producin g is especially well-readable and it is so good that we intend to produce not only magazines but also books in this way . I wish to mention one thing about the contractions . I have mentioned before in the discussions that we have about 400 contractions in the lists ; 300 are taken from the old system and about 100 new contractions have been added . Fortunately, shortly before the first system was developed, a large count had been taken by Keding . He counted 2 million Germa n words from miscellaneous texts, counted the frequency of a great many of them, and listed those which occurred a t least 10 times . The first list of contractions was based on this count with the effect that the most frequently used word s have been contracted, which was very effective . Unfortunately, there is no new count, and when searching for ne w contractions the old lists (now nearly 100 years old) had to be used . The language, however, has changed only in some certain aspects and most of the frequency counts found 100 years ago are still fairly reliable . Selecting new contractions , we looked for the frequencies of them in the lists and for the abbreviation effect .