小儿尾侧麻醉文献计量学分析

A. Saltali, E. Aslanlar
{"title":"小儿尾侧麻醉文献计量学分析","authors":"A. Saltali, E. Aslanlar","doi":"10.21765/pprjournal.1228593","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Abstract \nBackground: Bibliometric analysis studies are studies that examine the literature on a subject numerically and holistically, and have recently attracted a lot of attention in the field of medicine. The number of articles about pediatric caudal anesthesia has increased gradually over the past few decades. However, there is no bibliometric analysis study on pediatric caudal anesthesia in the literature. This study aimed to present a bibliometric analysis of articles published in the Web of Science (WoS) Core database related to pediatric caudal anesthesia. \nMethod: We used the search engine of WoS and included all types of contributions (original articles, reviews, letters, etc.) in the bibliometric analysis. The keywords used to access articles are ‘’pediatric, caudal, anesthesia, analgesia, and block’’ words. For the analyses, VOSViewer 1.6.13. version was used. \nResults: The most cited publications on pediatric caudal anesthesia were in the following journals: Pediatric Anesthesia (84 articles, 1892 citations), Anesthesia and Analgesia (26 articles, 884 citations) and Anesthesiology (7 articles, 537 citations). The countries that publish and receive the most citations about pediatric caudal anesthesia starting from the highest are the USA, France, Sweden, Turkey, Canada. \nConclusion: The following parameters were the foci of a thorough analysis of articles on pediatric caudal anesthesia: publication date, number of citations, journal name, theme, and country. It is noteworthy that pediatric caudal anesthesia currently plays a crucial role in pediatric anesthesia research. However, there is still a need for new studies from different countries on different cases in the literature on pediatric caudal anesthesia.","PeriodicalId":293877,"journal":{"name":"Pediatric Practice and Research","volume":"58 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-03-29","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Bibliometric analysis on pediatric caudal anesthesia\",\"authors\":\"A. Saltali, E. Aslanlar\",\"doi\":\"10.21765/pprjournal.1228593\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Abstract \\nBackground: Bibliometric analysis studies are studies that examine the literature on a subject numerically and holistically, and have recently attracted a lot of attention in the field of medicine. The number of articles about pediatric caudal anesthesia has increased gradually over the past few decades. However, there is no bibliometric analysis study on pediatric caudal anesthesia in the literature. This study aimed to present a bibliometric analysis of articles published in the Web of Science (WoS) Core database related to pediatric caudal anesthesia. \\nMethod: We used the search engine of WoS and included all types of contributions (original articles, reviews, letters, etc.) in the bibliometric analysis. The keywords used to access articles are ‘’pediatric, caudal, anesthesia, analgesia, and block’’ words. For the analyses, VOSViewer 1.6.13. version was used. \\nResults: The most cited publications on pediatric caudal anesthesia were in the following journals: Pediatric Anesthesia (84 articles, 1892 citations), Anesthesia and Analgesia (26 articles, 884 citations) and Anesthesiology (7 articles, 537 citations). The countries that publish and receive the most citations about pediatric caudal anesthesia starting from the highest are the USA, France, Sweden, Turkey, Canada. \\nConclusion: The following parameters were the foci of a thorough analysis of articles on pediatric caudal anesthesia: publication date, number of citations, journal name, theme, and country. It is noteworthy that pediatric caudal anesthesia currently plays a crucial role in pediatric anesthesia research. However, there is still a need for new studies from different countries on different cases in the literature on pediatric caudal anesthesia.\",\"PeriodicalId\":293877,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Pediatric Practice and Research\",\"volume\":\"58 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-03-29\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"1\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Pediatric Practice and Research\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.21765/pprjournal.1228593\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Pediatric Practice and Research","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.21765/pprjournal.1228593","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

摘要

摘要背景:文献计量分析研究是对某一主题的文献进行数字和整体检验的研究,近年来在医学领域引起了广泛的关注。在过去的几十年里,关于小儿尾侧麻醉的文章数量逐渐增加。然而,目前还没有文献计量学分析研究小儿尾侧麻醉。本研究旨在对发表在Web of Science (WoS) Core数据库中与儿科尾侧麻醉相关的文章进行文献计量学分析。方法:我们使用WoS的搜索引擎,将所有类型的投稿(原创文章、综述、信函等)纳入文献计量学分析。用于访问文章的关键词是“儿科、尾侧、麻醉、镇痛和阻塞”。使用VOSViewer 1.6.13进行分析。使用版本。结果:小儿尾侧麻醉被引频次最多的期刊为:小儿麻醉(84篇,1892次)、麻醉与镇痛(26篇,884次)和麻醉学(7篇,537次)。发表和接受儿科尾侧麻醉引用最多的国家是美国、法国、瑞典、土耳其和加拿大。结论:以下参数是对儿童尾侧麻醉相关文章进行全面分析的重点:发表日期、引用次数、期刊名称、主题和国家。值得注意的是,目前小儿尾侧麻醉在小儿麻醉研究中占有至关重要的地位。然而,关于小儿尾侧麻醉的文献仍需要不同国家不同病例的新研究。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Bibliometric analysis on pediatric caudal anesthesia
Abstract Background: Bibliometric analysis studies are studies that examine the literature on a subject numerically and holistically, and have recently attracted a lot of attention in the field of medicine. The number of articles about pediatric caudal anesthesia has increased gradually over the past few decades. However, there is no bibliometric analysis study on pediatric caudal anesthesia in the literature. This study aimed to present a bibliometric analysis of articles published in the Web of Science (WoS) Core database related to pediatric caudal anesthesia. Method: We used the search engine of WoS and included all types of contributions (original articles, reviews, letters, etc.) in the bibliometric analysis. The keywords used to access articles are ‘’pediatric, caudal, anesthesia, analgesia, and block’’ words. For the analyses, VOSViewer 1.6.13. version was used. Results: The most cited publications on pediatric caudal anesthesia were in the following journals: Pediatric Anesthesia (84 articles, 1892 citations), Anesthesia and Analgesia (26 articles, 884 citations) and Anesthesiology (7 articles, 537 citations). The countries that publish and receive the most citations about pediatric caudal anesthesia starting from the highest are the USA, France, Sweden, Turkey, Canada. Conclusion: The following parameters were the foci of a thorough analysis of articles on pediatric caudal anesthesia: publication date, number of citations, journal name, theme, and country. It is noteworthy that pediatric caudal anesthesia currently plays a crucial role in pediatric anesthesia research. However, there is still a need for new studies from different countries on different cases in the literature on pediatric caudal anesthesia.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信