输电网成本分摊方法的比较研究

S. Karthikeyan, B. Saravanan, A. Jain, I. Ranu, I. Raglend, D. Kothari
{"title":"输电网成本分摊方法的比较研究","authors":"S. Karthikeyan, B. Saravanan, A. Jain, I. Ranu, I. Raglend, D. Kothari","doi":"10.1109/ICPEC.2013.6527640","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"In the deregulated electricity market, it has become very important to determine the complete information about the participants who are utilizing the transmission network. Transmission line usage computation requires information of generator to load contributions and the path used by various generators to meet loads and losses. In the present restructured electricity market, it is necessary to develop appropriate pricing techniques that can provide the useful economic information to market participants. In this paper, the three existing techniques namely Zbus method, Zbusavg method and Relative Electrical Distance (RED) method for the network cost allocation is compared. It has been successfully applied on an IEEE 24 bus-Reliability Test System (RTS) and the results obtained are compared. The results obtained are quite encouraging and useful for the deregulated electricity market related issues. The simulation is carried out using MATLAB 7.8.0 (R 2009a).","PeriodicalId":176900,"journal":{"name":"2013 International Conference on Power, Energy and Control (ICPEC)","volume":"47 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2013-06-13","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"7","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"A comparative study on transmission network cost allocation methodologies\",\"authors\":\"S. Karthikeyan, B. Saravanan, A. Jain, I. Ranu, I. Raglend, D. Kothari\",\"doi\":\"10.1109/ICPEC.2013.6527640\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"In the deregulated electricity market, it has become very important to determine the complete information about the participants who are utilizing the transmission network. Transmission line usage computation requires information of generator to load contributions and the path used by various generators to meet loads and losses. In the present restructured electricity market, it is necessary to develop appropriate pricing techniques that can provide the useful economic information to market participants. In this paper, the three existing techniques namely Zbus method, Zbusavg method and Relative Electrical Distance (RED) method for the network cost allocation is compared. It has been successfully applied on an IEEE 24 bus-Reliability Test System (RTS) and the results obtained are compared. The results obtained are quite encouraging and useful for the deregulated electricity market related issues. The simulation is carried out using MATLAB 7.8.0 (R 2009a).\",\"PeriodicalId\":176900,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"2013 International Conference on Power, Energy and Control (ICPEC)\",\"volume\":\"47 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2013-06-13\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"7\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"2013 International Conference on Power, Energy and Control (ICPEC)\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1109/ICPEC.2013.6527640\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"2013 International Conference on Power, Energy and Control (ICPEC)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/ICPEC.2013.6527640","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 7

摘要

在解除管制的电力市场中,确定输电网络参与者的完整信息变得非常重要。传输线利用率计算需要发电机对负荷贡献的信息以及各发电机满足负荷和损耗的路径信息。在当前重组的电力市场中,有必要开发适当的定价技术,为市场参与者提供有用的经济信息。本文对现有的三种网络费用分摊方法即Zbus法、Zbusavg法和相对电距法进行了比较。该方法已成功应用于IEEE 24总线可靠性测试系统(RTS),并对测试结果进行了比较。所得结果对解除电力市场管制的相关问题具有鼓舞作用和借鉴意义。仿真采用MATLAB 7.8.0 (r2009a)进行。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
A comparative study on transmission network cost allocation methodologies
In the deregulated electricity market, it has become very important to determine the complete information about the participants who are utilizing the transmission network. Transmission line usage computation requires information of generator to load contributions and the path used by various generators to meet loads and losses. In the present restructured electricity market, it is necessary to develop appropriate pricing techniques that can provide the useful economic information to market participants. In this paper, the three existing techniques namely Zbus method, Zbusavg method and Relative Electrical Distance (RED) method for the network cost allocation is compared. It has been successfully applied on an IEEE 24 bus-Reliability Test System (RTS) and the results obtained are compared. The results obtained are quite encouraging and useful for the deregulated electricity market related issues. The simulation is carried out using MATLAB 7.8.0 (R 2009a).
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信