用外推偏差校正最小颠簸校准

Chanyoung Park, N. Kim, R. Haftka
{"title":"用外推偏差校正最小颠簸校准","authors":"Chanyoung Park, N. Kim, R. Haftka","doi":"10.1115/DETC2018-86163","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Bias correction is important for model calibration to obtain unbiased calibration parameter estimates and make accurate prediction. However, calibration often relies on insufficient samples, and so bias correction often mostly depends on extrapolation. For example, bias correction with twelve samples in nine-dimensional box generated by Latin Hypercube Sampling (LHS) has less than 0.1% interpolation domain in the box. Since bias correction is coupled with calibration parameter estimation, calibration with extrapolative bias correction can lead a large error in the calibrated parameters. This paper proposes an idea of calibration with minimum bumpiness correction. The bumpiness of bias correction is a good measure of assessing the potential risk of a large error in the correction. By minimizing bumpiness, the risk of extrapolation can be reduced while the accuracy of parameter estimates can be achieved. It was found that this calibration method gave more accurate results than Bayesian calibration for an analytical example. It was also found that there are common denominators between the proposed method and the Bayesian calibration with bias correction.","PeriodicalId":138856,"journal":{"name":"Volume 2A: 44th Design Automation Conference","volume":"17 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2018-08-26","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Least Bumpiness Calibration With Extrapolative Bias Correction\",\"authors\":\"Chanyoung Park, N. Kim, R. Haftka\",\"doi\":\"10.1115/DETC2018-86163\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Bias correction is important for model calibration to obtain unbiased calibration parameter estimates and make accurate prediction. However, calibration often relies on insufficient samples, and so bias correction often mostly depends on extrapolation. For example, bias correction with twelve samples in nine-dimensional box generated by Latin Hypercube Sampling (LHS) has less than 0.1% interpolation domain in the box. Since bias correction is coupled with calibration parameter estimation, calibration with extrapolative bias correction can lead a large error in the calibrated parameters. This paper proposes an idea of calibration with minimum bumpiness correction. The bumpiness of bias correction is a good measure of assessing the potential risk of a large error in the correction. By minimizing bumpiness, the risk of extrapolation can be reduced while the accuracy of parameter estimates can be achieved. It was found that this calibration method gave more accurate results than Bayesian calibration for an analytical example. It was also found that there are common denominators between the proposed method and the Bayesian calibration with bias correction.\",\"PeriodicalId\":138856,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Volume 2A: 44th Design Automation Conference\",\"volume\":\"17 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2018-08-26\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Volume 2A: 44th Design Automation Conference\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1115/DETC2018-86163\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Volume 2A: 44th Design Automation Conference","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1115/DETC2018-86163","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

为了得到无偏的定标参数估计值和做出准确的预测,偏置校正是模型定标的重要环节。然而,校准通常依赖于不足的样本,因此偏差校正通常主要依赖于外推。例如,拉丁超立方体采样(Latin Hypercube Sampling, LHS)生成的9维盒子中12个样本的偏置校正在盒子内的插值域小于0.1%。由于偏差校正与校准参数估计是耦合的,因此外推偏差校正会导致校准参数误差较大。本文提出了一种最小颠簸校正的标定思想。偏差修正的颠簸性是评估修正中较大误差的潜在风险的好方法。通过最小化起伏,可以降低外推的风险,同时可以实现参数估计的准确性。结果表明,该方法的校正结果比贝叶斯校正结果更准确。研究还发现,该方法与带偏差校正的贝叶斯校正方法存在共同之处。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Least Bumpiness Calibration With Extrapolative Bias Correction
Bias correction is important for model calibration to obtain unbiased calibration parameter estimates and make accurate prediction. However, calibration often relies on insufficient samples, and so bias correction often mostly depends on extrapolation. For example, bias correction with twelve samples in nine-dimensional box generated by Latin Hypercube Sampling (LHS) has less than 0.1% interpolation domain in the box. Since bias correction is coupled with calibration parameter estimation, calibration with extrapolative bias correction can lead a large error in the calibrated parameters. This paper proposes an idea of calibration with minimum bumpiness correction. The bumpiness of bias correction is a good measure of assessing the potential risk of a large error in the correction. By minimizing bumpiness, the risk of extrapolation can be reduced while the accuracy of parameter estimates can be achieved. It was found that this calibration method gave more accurate results than Bayesian calibration for an analytical example. It was also found that there are common denominators between the proposed method and the Bayesian calibration with bias correction.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信