作为罗马共和历史学家著作的标题的是Historia, annales, res gestae

O. V. Sidorovich
{"title":"作为罗马共和历史学家著作的标题的是Historia, annales, res gestae","authors":"O. V. Sidorovich","doi":"10.28995/2686-7249-2021-10-152-160","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Ancient historians as a rule didn’t entitle their own works. Those titles appear over time as a result of the work of grammarians or are found as such in the works of authors of later times. First of all that practice could be applied to the works that were written in Greek and native language by early Roman historians. On the basis of the study in the possible titles of those works – historia, annalles, res gestae – the issue of their genre is raised, judging by the content of the terms that denoted those works. Their terminological analysis led to the following conclusions: in the process of the formation of the annalistic narration as a form of account about the past, the “annals” began to be distinguished from the “history” as a work in which events contemporary to the author were represented. On the contrary the content of the term res gestae was close to what the Greeks called historia.","PeriodicalId":124543,"journal":{"name":"RSUH/RGGU Bulletin. \"Literary Theory. Linguistics. Cultural Studies\" Series","volume":"9 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"HISTORIA, ANNALES, RES GESTAE AS THE TITLES FOR THE WRITINGS OF ROMAN REPUBLICAN HISTORIANS\",\"authors\":\"O. V. Sidorovich\",\"doi\":\"10.28995/2686-7249-2021-10-152-160\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Ancient historians as a rule didn’t entitle their own works. Those titles appear over time as a result of the work of grammarians or are found as such in the works of authors of later times. First of all that practice could be applied to the works that were written in Greek and native language by early Roman historians. On the basis of the study in the possible titles of those works – historia, annalles, res gestae – the issue of their genre is raised, judging by the content of the terms that denoted those works. Their terminological analysis led to the following conclusions: in the process of the formation of the annalistic narration as a form of account about the past, the “annals” began to be distinguished from the “history” as a work in which events contemporary to the author were represented. On the contrary the content of the term res gestae was close to what the Greeks called historia.\",\"PeriodicalId\":124543,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"RSUH/RGGU Bulletin. \\\"Literary Theory. Linguistics. Cultural Studies\\\" Series\",\"volume\":\"9 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2021-10-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"RSUH/RGGU Bulletin. \\\"Literary Theory. Linguistics. Cultural Studies\\\" Series\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.28995/2686-7249-2021-10-152-160\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"RSUH/RGGU Bulletin. \"Literary Theory. Linguistics. Cultural Studies\" Series","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.28995/2686-7249-2021-10-152-160","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

古代历史学家通常不会给自己的著作起名。随着时间的推移,这些标题作为语法学家工作的结果出现,或者在后来的作者的作品中发现。首先,这种做法可以应用于早期罗马历史学家用希腊语和母语写的作品。在对这些作品可能的标题——历史、编年史、编年史——进行研究的基础上,提出了它们的体裁问题,根据这些作品所代表的术语的内容来判断。他们的术语分析得出以下结论:在编年史叙事作为一种叙述过去的形式的形成过程中,“编年史”开始与“历史”区分开来,因为“历史”是一种代表作者同时代事件的作品。相反,res gestae一词的内容与希腊人所说的historia很接近。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
HISTORIA, ANNALES, RES GESTAE AS THE TITLES FOR THE WRITINGS OF ROMAN REPUBLICAN HISTORIANS
Ancient historians as a rule didn’t entitle their own works. Those titles appear over time as a result of the work of grammarians or are found as such in the works of authors of later times. First of all that practice could be applied to the works that were written in Greek and native language by early Roman historians. On the basis of the study in the possible titles of those works – historia, annalles, res gestae – the issue of their genre is raised, judging by the content of the terms that denoted those works. Their terminological analysis led to the following conclusions: in the process of the formation of the annalistic narration as a form of account about the past, the “annals” began to be distinguished from the “history” as a work in which events contemporary to the author were represented. On the contrary the content of the term res gestae was close to what the Greeks called historia.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信