恢复鲑鱼生态系统

D. Bottom
{"title":"恢复鲑鱼生态系统","authors":"D. Bottom","doi":"10.3368/er.13.2.162","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"vast areas, Sometimes it seems we are bound to repeat history even when we are well aware of it. Such has been the history of conservation in America. Even after more than a century of documented experience, we continue to lose many of our native species, communities, and ecosystems. The collapse of native salmon stocks in the Pacific Northwest is one of the most recent examples. Despite the well-publicized loss of Atlantic salmon (Salmo salar) from most of New England in the nineteenth century, many populations of Pacific salmon (Oncorhynchus spp.) today face extinction for most of the same reasons. Now, even as the Northwest begins the enormous task of restoration, we are also reminded that repeated efforts to recover Atlantic salmon have met with little success. For all these reasons, the task of Northwestern restorationists is more than just the recovery of salmon. It is a fundamental reshaping of the traditional tenets of resource conservation. When several hundred natural resource professionals met last fall in Eugene, Oregon to discuss the latest ideas about restoring Pacific salmon, I could not help but recall accounts I had read of similar meetings more than a century ago. On June 13, 1872, state fish commissioners and fish culturists gathered in Boston to discuss plans for a new federal hatchery program to restock the depleted waters of New England and to introduce the most popular fish species across America (United States Commission of Fish and Fisheries, 1874). Then, as now, salmon was the focus of attention. Then, as now, salmon depletion was attributed to these causes: dams, water pollution, overfishing, and degradation of stream habitat resulting from the clearing of forests and the cultivation of agricultural lands (Marsh, 1857). Of course, in the 1870s the possibilities of a newly developed hatchery technology seemed limitless; the genetic and ecological risks of releasing large numbers of hatchery fish were simply unknown, and in any case, surely would have been unpersuasive in the giddy atmosphere of America’s gilded age. What now seems sadly ironic--that many once viewed the Pacific coast as a vast storehouse to replenish exhausted supplies of Atlantic salmon--then seemed only logical. Fish culturist Livingston Stone, who in 1872 established the U.S. Fish Commission’s first Pacific salmon hatchery on California’s McCloud River, typified the notion that restoration of Atlantic salmon was a simple economy of scale:","PeriodicalId":105419,"journal":{"name":"Restoration & Management Notes","volume":"42 6 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1995-12-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"9","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Restoring Salmon Ecosystems\",\"authors\":\"D. Bottom\",\"doi\":\"10.3368/er.13.2.162\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"vast areas, Sometimes it seems we are bound to repeat history even when we are well aware of it. Such has been the history of conservation in America. Even after more than a century of documented experience, we continue to lose many of our native species, communities, and ecosystems. The collapse of native salmon stocks in the Pacific Northwest is one of the most recent examples. Despite the well-publicized loss of Atlantic salmon (Salmo salar) from most of New England in the nineteenth century, many populations of Pacific salmon (Oncorhynchus spp.) today face extinction for most of the same reasons. Now, even as the Northwest begins the enormous task of restoration, we are also reminded that repeated efforts to recover Atlantic salmon have met with little success. For all these reasons, the task of Northwestern restorationists is more than just the recovery of salmon. It is a fundamental reshaping of the traditional tenets of resource conservation. When several hundred natural resource professionals met last fall in Eugene, Oregon to discuss the latest ideas about restoring Pacific salmon, I could not help but recall accounts I had read of similar meetings more than a century ago. On June 13, 1872, state fish commissioners and fish culturists gathered in Boston to discuss plans for a new federal hatchery program to restock the depleted waters of New England and to introduce the most popular fish species across America (United States Commission of Fish and Fisheries, 1874). Then, as now, salmon was the focus of attention. Then, as now, salmon depletion was attributed to these causes: dams, water pollution, overfishing, and degradation of stream habitat resulting from the clearing of forests and the cultivation of agricultural lands (Marsh, 1857). Of course, in the 1870s the possibilities of a newly developed hatchery technology seemed limitless; the genetic and ecological risks of releasing large numbers of hatchery fish were simply unknown, and in any case, surely would have been unpersuasive in the giddy atmosphere of America’s gilded age. What now seems sadly ironic--that many once viewed the Pacific coast as a vast storehouse to replenish exhausted supplies of Atlantic salmon--then seemed only logical. Fish culturist Livingston Stone, who in 1872 established the U.S. Fish Commission’s first Pacific salmon hatchery on California’s McCloud River, typified the notion that restoration of Atlantic salmon was a simple economy of scale:\",\"PeriodicalId\":105419,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Restoration & Management Notes\",\"volume\":\"42 6 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"1995-12-21\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"9\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Restoration & Management Notes\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.3368/er.13.2.162\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Restoration & Management Notes","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3368/er.13.2.162","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 9

摘要

有时,即使我们很清楚,我们似乎也注定要重复历史。这就是美国自然保护的历史。即使经过一个多世纪的文献记录,我们仍在继续失去许多本土物种、群落和生态系统。太平洋西北地区本地鲑鱼种群的锐减就是最近的一个例子。尽管19世纪大西洋鲑鱼(Salmo salar)在新英格兰大部分地区的灭绝广为报道,但今天许多太平洋鲑鱼(Oncorhynchus spp.)种群由于大部分相同的原因面临灭绝。现在,即使西北地区开始了巨大的恢复任务,我们也被提醒,恢复大西洋鲑鱼的多次努力收效甚微。由于所有这些原因,西北恢复主义者的任务不仅仅是恢复鲑鱼。这是对传统资源保护原则的根本重塑。去年秋天,当数百名自然资源专业人士在俄勒冈州尤金开会,讨论恢复太平洋鲑鱼的最新想法时,我不禁回想起一个多世纪前我读到过的类似会议。1872年6月13日,各州渔业专员和养鱼者聚集在波士顿,讨论一项新的联邦孵化场计划,以补充新英格兰枯竭的水域,并引入美国最受欢迎的鱼类(美国鱼类和渔业委员会,1874)。当时和现在一样,鲑鱼是人们关注的焦点。当时和现在一样,鲑鱼的枯竭被归结为以下原因:水坝、水污染、过度捕捞,以及由于砍伐森林和开垦农田而导致的溪流栖息地退化(Marsh, 1857)。当然,在19世纪70年代,一项新开发的孵卵技术的可能性似乎是无限的;释放大量孵化场鱼类的遗传和生态风险根本是未知的,而且无论如何,在美国镀金时代令人眼花缭乱的气氛中,肯定是没有说服力的。许多人曾经把太平洋沿岸视为一个巨大的仓库,用来补充枯竭的大西洋鲑鱼,这在现在看来是可悲的讽刺,但在当时似乎是合乎逻辑的。养鱼家利文斯顿·斯通于1872年在加利福尼亚的麦克克劳德河建立了美国鱼类委员会的第一个太平洋鲑鱼孵卵场,他代表了大西洋鲑鱼的恢复是一个简单的规模经济的概念:
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Restoring Salmon Ecosystems
vast areas, Sometimes it seems we are bound to repeat history even when we are well aware of it. Such has been the history of conservation in America. Even after more than a century of documented experience, we continue to lose many of our native species, communities, and ecosystems. The collapse of native salmon stocks in the Pacific Northwest is one of the most recent examples. Despite the well-publicized loss of Atlantic salmon (Salmo salar) from most of New England in the nineteenth century, many populations of Pacific salmon (Oncorhynchus spp.) today face extinction for most of the same reasons. Now, even as the Northwest begins the enormous task of restoration, we are also reminded that repeated efforts to recover Atlantic salmon have met with little success. For all these reasons, the task of Northwestern restorationists is more than just the recovery of salmon. It is a fundamental reshaping of the traditional tenets of resource conservation. When several hundred natural resource professionals met last fall in Eugene, Oregon to discuss the latest ideas about restoring Pacific salmon, I could not help but recall accounts I had read of similar meetings more than a century ago. On June 13, 1872, state fish commissioners and fish culturists gathered in Boston to discuss plans for a new federal hatchery program to restock the depleted waters of New England and to introduce the most popular fish species across America (United States Commission of Fish and Fisheries, 1874). Then, as now, salmon was the focus of attention. Then, as now, salmon depletion was attributed to these causes: dams, water pollution, overfishing, and degradation of stream habitat resulting from the clearing of forests and the cultivation of agricultural lands (Marsh, 1857). Of course, in the 1870s the possibilities of a newly developed hatchery technology seemed limitless; the genetic and ecological risks of releasing large numbers of hatchery fish were simply unknown, and in any case, surely would have been unpersuasive in the giddy atmosphere of America’s gilded age. What now seems sadly ironic--that many once viewed the Pacific coast as a vast storehouse to replenish exhausted supplies of Atlantic salmon--then seemed only logical. Fish culturist Livingston Stone, who in 1872 established the U.S. Fish Commission’s first Pacific salmon hatchery on California’s McCloud River, typified the notion that restoration of Atlantic salmon was a simple economy of scale:
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信