我反对抵制以色列学者的十个理由(以及为什么你也应该这么做!)

Robert Fine
{"title":"我反对抵制以色列学者的十个理由(以及为什么你也应该这么做!)","authors":"Robert Fine","doi":"10.26613/JCA/2.1.25","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This is not the first time I have been embroiled in a boycott debate. In the 1980s, I was involved in solidarity work with the fledgling indepen- dent trade unions in South Africa. They were a living expression of non-racial democracy across so-called national lines. Solidarity included establishing direct links between South African and British unions at official and rank–and-file levels. As a result of our solidarity activities, we were pilloried by leading figures in anti-apartheid, the ANC, and the South African Communist Party for breaking the boycott! When we invited a South African academic, a leading advocate of the new unions and anti-apartheid scholar, to speak at our Comparative Labour Studies pro- gram at Warwick University, a demonstration was organized by a couple of SACP stalwarts to prevent him from speaking. When we wrote a trade union solidarity pamphlet, we were told that unions could only be legal in South Africa if they collaborated with the regime and that we were in effect collaborationists. Beneath the argument about boycott what was really going on was a political battle  between a progressive socialist politics and quite reactionary nationalist politics. It is a battle that has not stopped and is rising to the surface in contemporary South Africa. I grant there is no direct analogy between the boycott of apartheid South Africa and that of Israeli academic insti- tutions, but I contend that a similar political battle is taking place—a battle for our future political life.","PeriodicalId":283546,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Contemporary Antisemitism","volume":"5 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Ten Reasons Why I Oppose Boycotts Against Israeli Academics (And Why You Should Too!)\",\"authors\":\"Robert Fine\",\"doi\":\"10.26613/JCA/2.1.25\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"This is not the first time I have been embroiled in a boycott debate. In the 1980s, I was involved in solidarity work with the fledgling indepen- dent trade unions in South Africa. They were a living expression of non-racial democracy across so-called national lines. Solidarity included establishing direct links between South African and British unions at official and rank–and-file levels. As a result of our solidarity activities, we were pilloried by leading figures in anti-apartheid, the ANC, and the South African Communist Party for breaking the boycott! When we invited a South African academic, a leading advocate of the new unions and anti-apartheid scholar, to speak at our Comparative Labour Studies pro- gram at Warwick University, a demonstration was organized by a couple of SACP stalwarts to prevent him from speaking. When we wrote a trade union solidarity pamphlet, we were told that unions could only be legal in South Africa if they collaborated with the regime and that we were in effect collaborationists. Beneath the argument about boycott what was really going on was a political battle  between a progressive socialist politics and quite reactionary nationalist politics. It is a battle that has not stopped and is rising to the surface in contemporary South Africa. I grant there is no direct analogy between the boycott of apartheid South Africa and that of Israeli academic insti- tutions, but I contend that a similar political battle is taking place—a battle for our future political life.\",\"PeriodicalId\":283546,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Contemporary Antisemitism\",\"volume\":\"5 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2019-03-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Contemporary Antisemitism\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.26613/JCA/2.1.25\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Contemporary Antisemitism","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.26613/JCA/2.1.25","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

这不是我第一次卷入抵制辩论。在20世纪80年代,我参与了南非羽翼未丰的独立工会的团结工作。他们是跨越所谓国家界线的非种族民主的生动表现。团结包括在南非和英国的官方和基层工会之间建立直接联系。由于我们的团结活动,我们被反种族隔离、非国大和南非共产党的领导人物嘲笑,因为我们打破了抵制!当我们邀请一位南非学者,一位新工会的主要倡导者和反种族隔离学者,在华威大学的比较劳工研究项目上演讲时,几个南非共产党的忠实拥护者组织了一场示威,阻止他发言。当我们撰写工会团结小册子时,我们被告知,工会只有在与政府合作的情况下才能在南非合法,而我们实际上是合作者。在抵制的争论之下,真正发生的是一场政治斗争,在进步的社会主义政治和相当反动的民族主义政治之间。这是一场没有停止并正在当代南非浮出水面的战斗。我承认,对种族隔离的南非的抵制与对以色列学术机构的抵制之间没有直接的相似之处,但我认为,一场类似的政治斗争正在发生——一场为我们未来政治生活而进行的斗争。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Ten Reasons Why I Oppose Boycotts Against Israeli Academics (And Why You Should Too!)
This is not the first time I have been embroiled in a boycott debate. In the 1980s, I was involved in solidarity work with the fledgling indepen- dent trade unions in South Africa. They were a living expression of non-racial democracy across so-called national lines. Solidarity included establishing direct links between South African and British unions at official and rank–and-file levels. As a result of our solidarity activities, we were pilloried by leading figures in anti-apartheid, the ANC, and the South African Communist Party for breaking the boycott! When we invited a South African academic, a leading advocate of the new unions and anti-apartheid scholar, to speak at our Comparative Labour Studies pro- gram at Warwick University, a demonstration was organized by a couple of SACP stalwarts to prevent him from speaking. When we wrote a trade union solidarity pamphlet, we were told that unions could only be legal in South Africa if they collaborated with the regime and that we were in effect collaborationists. Beneath the argument about boycott what was really going on was a political battle  between a progressive socialist politics and quite reactionary nationalist politics. It is a battle that has not stopped and is rising to the surface in contemporary South Africa. I grant there is no direct analogy between the boycott of apartheid South Africa and that of Israeli academic insti- tutions, but I contend that a similar political battle is taking place—a battle for our future political life.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信