非洲与人权:过去、现在和未来

O. Agbede
{"title":"非洲与人权:过去、现在和未来","authors":"O. Agbede","doi":"10.2139/ssrn.3612418","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The root of most Human Rights discussions in Africa stems from the input of foreigners, either Europeans, the English. This tracing of everything human right to the whites gives the impression that they introduced the better morality, better religion, better idea of right as distinct from wrong and better idea of human rights into our “barbaric practice and tradition”. The writer as a prelude to our discussion would be examining the concept \"Africa\" and “human right”, going further to refute the erroneous assertion as evidenced supra that human rights is a relatively new concept to Africa, concluding the discussion with a subtle outlook of the African Charter.","PeriodicalId":120850,"journal":{"name":"African Law eJournal","volume":"63 6","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2020-05-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Africa and Human Rights: Past, Present and Future\",\"authors\":\"O. Agbede\",\"doi\":\"10.2139/ssrn.3612418\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"The root of most Human Rights discussions in Africa stems from the input of foreigners, either Europeans, the English. This tracing of everything human right to the whites gives the impression that they introduced the better morality, better religion, better idea of right as distinct from wrong and better idea of human rights into our “barbaric practice and tradition”. The writer as a prelude to our discussion would be examining the concept \\\"Africa\\\" and “human right”, going further to refute the erroneous assertion as evidenced supra that human rights is a relatively new concept to Africa, concluding the discussion with a subtle outlook of the African Charter.\",\"PeriodicalId\":120850,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"African Law eJournal\",\"volume\":\"63 6\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2020-05-20\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"African Law eJournal\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3612418\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"African Law eJournal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3612418","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

在非洲,大多数人权讨论的根源都来自外国人的介入,无论是欧洲人还是英国人。这种把一切人权都追溯到白人身上的做法给人的印象是,他们把更好的道德、更好的宗教、更好的区分是非的正确观念和更好的人权观念引入了我们的“野蛮实践和传统”。作为我们讨论的前奏,作者将审查“非洲”和“人权”的概念,进一步驳斥上文所证明的错误主张,即人权对非洲来说是一个相对较新的概念,并以对《非洲宪章》的微妙看法结束讨论。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Africa and Human Rights: Past, Present and Future
The root of most Human Rights discussions in Africa stems from the input of foreigners, either Europeans, the English. This tracing of everything human right to the whites gives the impression that they introduced the better morality, better religion, better idea of right as distinct from wrong and better idea of human rights into our “barbaric practice and tradition”. The writer as a prelude to our discussion would be examining the concept "Africa" and “human right”, going further to refute the erroneous assertion as evidenced supra that human rights is a relatively new concept to Africa, concluding the discussion with a subtle outlook of the African Charter.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信