{"title":"配对公司债券交易","authors":"Eric Zitzewitz","doi":"10.2139/ssrn.1648994","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Using a newly introduced TRACE variable that identifies the side(s) taken by dealers in each trade, I find that 37 percent of dealer-client trades are accompanied by an inter-dealer trade, usually for the exact same quantity and often executed at the exact second as the client trade. All but 0.4 percent of these trade pairs would involve a non-negative profit for a dealer who was involved in both trades. Pairing is much more common for small trades - 46 percent of trades under $100,000 are paired, but only 4.5 percent of trades of $500,000 and above. Controlling for trade size, pairing is less common for trades by institutional clients. Paired trades involve higher trading costs, which are split roughly 50-50 between the pairing dealer and the dealer ultimately taking the other side. Taken together, the evidence suggests that pairing is a symptom of clients being unable to search over the entire market, producing nearly risk-free trading profits for dealers with client relationships or contractual rights to handle order flow.","PeriodicalId":285784,"journal":{"name":"ERN: Economics of Contract: Theory (Topic)","volume":"113 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2010-07-26","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"15","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Paired Corporate Bond Trades\",\"authors\":\"Eric Zitzewitz\",\"doi\":\"10.2139/ssrn.1648994\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Using a newly introduced TRACE variable that identifies the side(s) taken by dealers in each trade, I find that 37 percent of dealer-client trades are accompanied by an inter-dealer trade, usually for the exact same quantity and often executed at the exact second as the client trade. All but 0.4 percent of these trade pairs would involve a non-negative profit for a dealer who was involved in both trades. Pairing is much more common for small trades - 46 percent of trades under $100,000 are paired, but only 4.5 percent of trades of $500,000 and above. Controlling for trade size, pairing is less common for trades by institutional clients. Paired trades involve higher trading costs, which are split roughly 50-50 between the pairing dealer and the dealer ultimately taking the other side. Taken together, the evidence suggests that pairing is a symptom of clients being unable to search over the entire market, producing nearly risk-free trading profits for dealers with client relationships or contractual rights to handle order flow.\",\"PeriodicalId\":285784,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"ERN: Economics of Contract: Theory (Topic)\",\"volume\":\"113 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2010-07-26\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"15\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"ERN: Economics of Contract: Theory (Topic)\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.1648994\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"ERN: Economics of Contract: Theory (Topic)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.1648994","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
Using a newly introduced TRACE variable that identifies the side(s) taken by dealers in each trade, I find that 37 percent of dealer-client trades are accompanied by an inter-dealer trade, usually for the exact same quantity and often executed at the exact second as the client trade. All but 0.4 percent of these trade pairs would involve a non-negative profit for a dealer who was involved in both trades. Pairing is much more common for small trades - 46 percent of trades under $100,000 are paired, but only 4.5 percent of trades of $500,000 and above. Controlling for trade size, pairing is less common for trades by institutional clients. Paired trades involve higher trading costs, which are split roughly 50-50 between the pairing dealer and the dealer ultimately taking the other side. Taken together, the evidence suggests that pairing is a symptom of clients being unable to search over the entire market, producing nearly risk-free trading profits for dealers with client relationships or contractual rights to handle order flow.