孟加拉国一家三级医院新生儿败血症的细菌学特征和药物敏感性变化趋势

Maksudur Rahman, B. Yasmeen, N. Jahan, M. Hoque, S. Halder, A. Halder, Nondini Rahman Nupur, I. Zerin, Fatema Akter Rini
{"title":"孟加拉国一家三级医院新生儿败血症的细菌学特征和药物敏感性变化趋势","authors":"Maksudur Rahman, B. Yasmeen, N. Jahan, M. Hoque, S. Halder, A. Halder, Nondini Rahman Nupur, I. Zerin, Fatema Akter Rini","doi":"10.3329/nimcj.v11i1.50738","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Background : In Bangladesh about 67% of under-five mortality is neonatal mortality. One of three major causes of neonatal morbidity and mortality is septicemia. Recently there is increasing incidence of multidrug resistant neonatal organisms which is alarming. \nObjective : The aim of this study was to see the bacteriological profile and drug sensitivity pattern of neonatal septicemia. \nMethods : This prospective observational study was done in Dhaka Shishu (children) Hospital over one-year period from June 2018 to May 2019. The admitted neonates were suspected as neonatal septicemia considering the risk factors, clinical profile and investigations (CBC, CRP etc.). Blood from all suspected neonatal septicemia cases were sent for culture and drugs sensitivity along with others necessary investigations. Then data was analyzed with SPSS version-20. \nResults : Among the suspected cases only 111(10%) patients were culture positive. Preterm were 77(69%) and term 34(31%). One hundred six cases (95%) had sepsis with gram negative organisms and 5(5%) had sepsis with gram positive organisms with more predominant of Klebsiella (76,68%) followed by Acinetobacter (16,14%), Pseudomonas (6,5%), Escherichia coli (3,3%). Majority 80 (72%) cases had Early onset neonatal sepsis (EONS). Klebsiella (57, 51%) was more common organism followed by Acinetobacter (11,10 %) causing EONS and in late onset neonatal sepsis (LONS), similar type of causative organism were found. Ampicillin, Gentamicin and Ceftazidime were mostly resistance to gram negative organisms - 104(94%), 99(89%) and 93(84%) respectively. Besides these, Amikacin (104,94%), Imipenem (85, 77%) and Ciprofloxacin (73, 66%) were more resistance. Klebsiella in 17 cases and Acinetobacter in 4 cases were resistant to all commonly used antibiotics. \nConclusion : Klebsiella followed by Acinetobacter and Pseudomonas are now common pathogens of neonatal septicemia found in this study. Ampicillin, Gentamicin and Ceftazidime are more resistant to most of the organisms causing neonatal sepsis. Imipenem is alarmingly resistant. In 19% cases, the organisms are resistance to all commonly used antibiotics. \nNorthern International Medical College Journal Vol. 11 No. 1 July 2019, Page 427-431","PeriodicalId":389586,"journal":{"name":"Northern International Medical College Journal","volume":"5 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2020-12-13","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Recent Trend of Bacteriological Profile and Drug Sensitivity Pattern of Neonatal Septicemia in A Tertiary Care Hospital in Bangladesh\",\"authors\":\"Maksudur Rahman, B. Yasmeen, N. Jahan, M. Hoque, S. Halder, A. Halder, Nondini Rahman Nupur, I. Zerin, Fatema Akter Rini\",\"doi\":\"10.3329/nimcj.v11i1.50738\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Background : In Bangladesh about 67% of under-five mortality is neonatal mortality. One of three major causes of neonatal morbidity and mortality is septicemia. Recently there is increasing incidence of multidrug resistant neonatal organisms which is alarming. \\nObjective : The aim of this study was to see the bacteriological profile and drug sensitivity pattern of neonatal septicemia. \\nMethods : This prospective observational study was done in Dhaka Shishu (children) Hospital over one-year period from June 2018 to May 2019. The admitted neonates were suspected as neonatal septicemia considering the risk factors, clinical profile and investigations (CBC, CRP etc.). Blood from all suspected neonatal septicemia cases were sent for culture and drugs sensitivity along with others necessary investigations. Then data was analyzed with SPSS version-20. \\nResults : Among the suspected cases only 111(10%) patients were culture positive. Preterm were 77(69%) and term 34(31%). One hundred six cases (95%) had sepsis with gram negative organisms and 5(5%) had sepsis with gram positive organisms with more predominant of Klebsiella (76,68%) followed by Acinetobacter (16,14%), Pseudomonas (6,5%), Escherichia coli (3,3%). Majority 80 (72%) cases had Early onset neonatal sepsis (EONS). Klebsiella (57, 51%) was more common organism followed by Acinetobacter (11,10 %) causing EONS and in late onset neonatal sepsis (LONS), similar type of causative organism were found. Ampicillin, Gentamicin and Ceftazidime were mostly resistance to gram negative organisms - 104(94%), 99(89%) and 93(84%) respectively. Besides these, Amikacin (104,94%), Imipenem (85, 77%) and Ciprofloxacin (73, 66%) were more resistance. Klebsiella in 17 cases and Acinetobacter in 4 cases were resistant to all commonly used antibiotics. \\nConclusion : Klebsiella followed by Acinetobacter and Pseudomonas are now common pathogens of neonatal septicemia found in this study. Ampicillin, Gentamicin and Ceftazidime are more resistant to most of the organisms causing neonatal sepsis. Imipenem is alarmingly resistant. In 19% cases, the organisms are resistance to all commonly used antibiotics. \\nNorthern International Medical College Journal Vol. 11 No. 1 July 2019, Page 427-431\",\"PeriodicalId\":389586,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Northern International Medical College Journal\",\"volume\":\"5 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2020-12-13\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Northern International Medical College Journal\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.3329/nimcj.v11i1.50738\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Northern International Medical College Journal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3329/nimcj.v11i1.50738","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:在孟加拉国,约67%的五岁以下儿童死亡率是新生儿死亡率。新生儿发病和死亡的三个主要原因之一是败血症。近年来,耐多药新生儿微生物的发病率不断上升,令人担忧。目的:了解新生儿败血症的细菌学特征和药敏模式。方法:本前瞻性观察研究于2018年6月至2019年5月在达卡Shishu(儿童)医院进行,为期一年。考虑危险因素、临床特点及检查结果(CBC、CRP等),怀疑新生儿败血症。所有疑似新生儿败血症病例的血液都被送去进行培养和药物敏感性以及其他必要的调查。然后用SPSS version-20对数据进行分析。结果:疑似病例中培养阳性111例(10%)。早产77例(69%),足月34例(31%)。革兰氏阴性菌脓毒症106例(95%),革兰氏阳性菌脓毒症5例(5%),以克雷伯菌(76,68%)居多,其次为不动杆菌(16.14%)、假单胞菌(6,5%)、大肠杆菌(3,3%)。大多数80例(72%)为早发性新生儿脓毒症(EONS)。导致EONS的病原菌以克雷伯菌(57,51%)居多,其次是不动杆菌(11.10%),而在迟发性新生儿败血症(LONS)中,也发现了类似类型的病原菌。对革兰氏阴性菌耐药最多的是氨苄西林、庆大霉素和头孢他啶,分别为104(94%)、99(89%)和93(84%)。此外,阿米卡星(104,94%)、亚胺培南(85,77%)和环丙沙星(73,66%)耐药率较高。克雷伯菌17例,不动杆菌4例,对所有常用抗生素均耐药。结论:克雷伯菌、不动杆菌和假单胞菌是本研究中新生儿败血症的常见致病菌。氨苄西林、庆大霉素和头孢他啶对大多数引起新生儿败血症的微生物具有更强的耐药性。亚胺培南具有惊人的耐药性。在19%的病例中,这些微生物对所有常用抗生素都具有耐药性。《北方国际医学院学报》2019年7月1日,第427-431页
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Recent Trend of Bacteriological Profile and Drug Sensitivity Pattern of Neonatal Septicemia in A Tertiary Care Hospital in Bangladesh
Background : In Bangladesh about 67% of under-five mortality is neonatal mortality. One of three major causes of neonatal morbidity and mortality is septicemia. Recently there is increasing incidence of multidrug resistant neonatal organisms which is alarming. Objective : The aim of this study was to see the bacteriological profile and drug sensitivity pattern of neonatal septicemia. Methods : This prospective observational study was done in Dhaka Shishu (children) Hospital over one-year period from June 2018 to May 2019. The admitted neonates were suspected as neonatal septicemia considering the risk factors, clinical profile and investigations (CBC, CRP etc.). Blood from all suspected neonatal septicemia cases were sent for culture and drugs sensitivity along with others necessary investigations. Then data was analyzed with SPSS version-20. Results : Among the suspected cases only 111(10%) patients were culture positive. Preterm were 77(69%) and term 34(31%). One hundred six cases (95%) had sepsis with gram negative organisms and 5(5%) had sepsis with gram positive organisms with more predominant of Klebsiella (76,68%) followed by Acinetobacter (16,14%), Pseudomonas (6,5%), Escherichia coli (3,3%). Majority 80 (72%) cases had Early onset neonatal sepsis (EONS). Klebsiella (57, 51%) was more common organism followed by Acinetobacter (11,10 %) causing EONS and in late onset neonatal sepsis (LONS), similar type of causative organism were found. Ampicillin, Gentamicin and Ceftazidime were mostly resistance to gram negative organisms - 104(94%), 99(89%) and 93(84%) respectively. Besides these, Amikacin (104,94%), Imipenem (85, 77%) and Ciprofloxacin (73, 66%) were more resistance. Klebsiella in 17 cases and Acinetobacter in 4 cases were resistant to all commonly used antibiotics. Conclusion : Klebsiella followed by Acinetobacter and Pseudomonas are now common pathogens of neonatal septicemia found in this study. Ampicillin, Gentamicin and Ceftazidime are more resistant to most of the organisms causing neonatal sepsis. Imipenem is alarmingly resistant. In 19% cases, the organisms are resistance to all commonly used antibiotics. Northern International Medical College Journal Vol. 11 No. 1 July 2019, Page 427-431
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信