使用不同的皮质表面分析方案的大脑认知关系的可重复性

K. Martínez, Anand A. Joshi, S. Madsen, Shantanu H. Joshi, S. Karama, F. J. Román, Julio Villalón, M. Burgaleta, P. Thompson, R. Colom
{"title":"使用不同的皮质表面分析方案的大脑认知关系的可重复性","authors":"K. Martínez, Anand A. Joshi, S. Madsen, Shantanu H. Joshi, S. Karama, F. J. Román, Julio Villalón, M. Burgaleta, P. Thompson, R. Colom","doi":"10.1109/ISBI.2014.6868046","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Neuroimaging techniques are now widely used to understand relationships between brain features and cognitive performance. Nevertheless, studies do not always implicate the same anatomical neural networks in intellectual function. Here we used T1-weighted brain MRI scans obtained from a sample of 82 healthy young adults to study four potential sources of variability affecting the reproducibility of brain-cognition relationships: the neuroimaging protocol used, different measures of cortical gray matter, the nature of the cognitive measurement, and sample characteristics. We found that brain networks implicated in individual differences in cognition were not consistent when derived from different gray matter measures, or from different surface-based processing pipelines, even in equivalent samples of participants. Differences in the networks associated with cognition may reflect differences in the methods used to analyze them; in addition, different individuals may reach equivalent psychological goals through disparate brain networks.","PeriodicalId":440405,"journal":{"name":"2014 IEEE 11th International Symposium on Biomedical Imaging (ISBI)","volume":"16 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2014-07-31","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"2","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Reproducibility of brain-cognition relationships using different cortical surface-based analysis protocols\",\"authors\":\"K. Martínez, Anand A. Joshi, S. Madsen, Shantanu H. Joshi, S. Karama, F. J. Román, Julio Villalón, M. Burgaleta, P. Thompson, R. Colom\",\"doi\":\"10.1109/ISBI.2014.6868046\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Neuroimaging techniques are now widely used to understand relationships between brain features and cognitive performance. Nevertheless, studies do not always implicate the same anatomical neural networks in intellectual function. Here we used T1-weighted brain MRI scans obtained from a sample of 82 healthy young adults to study four potential sources of variability affecting the reproducibility of brain-cognition relationships: the neuroimaging protocol used, different measures of cortical gray matter, the nature of the cognitive measurement, and sample characteristics. We found that brain networks implicated in individual differences in cognition were not consistent when derived from different gray matter measures, or from different surface-based processing pipelines, even in equivalent samples of participants. Differences in the networks associated with cognition may reflect differences in the methods used to analyze them; in addition, different individuals may reach equivalent psychological goals through disparate brain networks.\",\"PeriodicalId\":440405,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"2014 IEEE 11th International Symposium on Biomedical Imaging (ISBI)\",\"volume\":\"16 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2014-07-31\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"2\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"2014 IEEE 11th International Symposium on Biomedical Imaging (ISBI)\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1109/ISBI.2014.6868046\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"2014 IEEE 11th International Symposium on Biomedical Imaging (ISBI)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/ISBI.2014.6868046","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

摘要

神经成像技术现在被广泛用于理解大脑特征和认知表现之间的关系。然而,研究并不总是暗示相同的解剖神经网络在智力功能。在这里,我们使用从82名健康年轻人样本中获得的t1加权脑MRI扫描来研究影响脑-认知关系可重复性的变异性的四个潜在来源:所使用的神经成像方案、不同的皮层灰质测量、认知测量的性质和样本特征。我们发现,即使在相同的参与者样本中,当来自不同的灰质测量或不同的表面处理管道时,涉及认知个体差异的大脑网络也不一致。与认知相关的网络的差异可能反映了分析它们的方法的差异;此外,不同的个体可能通过不同的大脑网络达到相同的心理目标。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Reproducibility of brain-cognition relationships using different cortical surface-based analysis protocols
Neuroimaging techniques are now widely used to understand relationships between brain features and cognitive performance. Nevertheless, studies do not always implicate the same anatomical neural networks in intellectual function. Here we used T1-weighted brain MRI scans obtained from a sample of 82 healthy young adults to study four potential sources of variability affecting the reproducibility of brain-cognition relationships: the neuroimaging protocol used, different measures of cortical gray matter, the nature of the cognitive measurement, and sample characteristics. We found that brain networks implicated in individual differences in cognition were not consistent when derived from different gray matter measures, or from different surface-based processing pipelines, even in equivalent samples of participants. Differences in the networks associated with cognition may reflect differences in the methods used to analyze them; in addition, different individuals may reach equivalent psychological goals through disparate brain networks.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信