护理工作中的“个性”研究

Kimiko Yamamoto, Miwako Hirakawa, Chigusa Omori, Tomoko Sato, M. Amano, Yukiko Sato, Junko Ota, Saori Matsuzaki, Yoshiyuki Inoue, Takahito Takeuchi
{"title":"护理工作中的“个性”研究","authors":"Kimiko Yamamoto, Miwako Hirakawa, Chigusa Omori, Tomoko Sato, M. Amano, Yukiko Sato, Junko Ota, Saori Matsuzaki, Yoshiyuki Inoue, Takahito Takeuchi","doi":"10.14391/AJHS.15.52","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The objective of this research is to clarify how nursing care staff perceive the user’s “individuality” based on their shared view in nursing care practices. The survey with paper questionnaire was conducted among 114 nursing care staff who worked at a care giving facility. As a result, 95 (83.3%) commented they had an experience of using the word, “individuality,” 22 (19.3%) commented they provided nursing care with “individuality” all the time, and 68 (59.6%) commented sometimes. In addition, we conducted the self-assessment and others-assessment personality test (BigFive short version) among 12 users who were engaged with all 9 nursing care staff in the same team, and then analyzed with Friedman test. As a result, it was clear that nursing care staff had different user perception on four factors, extroversion, openness, sincerity, and harmonicity, whereas they had a common perception on one factor, emotional unstableness. This indicates that it has high potential of providing consistent emotional care; however, it is also considered that they tend to provide care focusing on emotion.","PeriodicalId":370734,"journal":{"name":"Asian journal of human services","volume":"35 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1900-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Study of “Individuality” on Nursing Care Job\",\"authors\":\"Kimiko Yamamoto, Miwako Hirakawa, Chigusa Omori, Tomoko Sato, M. Amano, Yukiko Sato, Junko Ota, Saori Matsuzaki, Yoshiyuki Inoue, Takahito Takeuchi\",\"doi\":\"10.14391/AJHS.15.52\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"The objective of this research is to clarify how nursing care staff perceive the user’s “individuality” based on their shared view in nursing care practices. The survey with paper questionnaire was conducted among 114 nursing care staff who worked at a care giving facility. As a result, 95 (83.3%) commented they had an experience of using the word, “individuality,” 22 (19.3%) commented they provided nursing care with “individuality” all the time, and 68 (59.6%) commented sometimes. In addition, we conducted the self-assessment and others-assessment personality test (BigFive short version) among 12 users who were engaged with all 9 nursing care staff in the same team, and then analyzed with Friedman test. As a result, it was clear that nursing care staff had different user perception on four factors, extroversion, openness, sincerity, and harmonicity, whereas they had a common perception on one factor, emotional unstableness. This indicates that it has high potential of providing consistent emotional care; however, it is also considered that they tend to provide care focusing on emotion.\",\"PeriodicalId\":370734,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Asian journal of human services\",\"volume\":\"35 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"1900-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Asian journal of human services\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.14391/AJHS.15.52\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Asian journal of human services","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.14391/AJHS.15.52","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

本研究的目的是阐明护理人员如何基于他们在护理实践中的共同观点来感知用户的“个性”。采用纸质问卷对114名在某养老机构工作的护理人员进行调查。结果显示,95人(83.3%)表示有过使用“个性”一词的经历,22人(19.3%)表示一直提供“个性”护理,68人(59.6%)表示有时提供“个性”护理。此外,我们对12名用户进行了自我评估和他人评估人格测试(BigFive短版),这些用户与同一团队的所有9名护理人员都有接触,然后使用Friedman测试进行分析。结果表明,护理人员在外向性、开放性、真诚性和和谐性四个因素上存在不同的用户感知,而在情绪不稳定性这一个因素上存在共同的感知。这表明它具有提供持续情感关怀的高潜力;然而,也有人认为他们倾向于提供关注情感的护理。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Study of “Individuality” on Nursing Care Job
The objective of this research is to clarify how nursing care staff perceive the user’s “individuality” based on their shared view in nursing care practices. The survey with paper questionnaire was conducted among 114 nursing care staff who worked at a care giving facility. As a result, 95 (83.3%) commented they had an experience of using the word, “individuality,” 22 (19.3%) commented they provided nursing care with “individuality” all the time, and 68 (59.6%) commented sometimes. In addition, we conducted the self-assessment and others-assessment personality test (BigFive short version) among 12 users who were engaged with all 9 nursing care staff in the same team, and then analyzed with Friedman test. As a result, it was clear that nursing care staff had different user perception on four factors, extroversion, openness, sincerity, and harmonicity, whereas they had a common perception on one factor, emotional unstableness. This indicates that it has high potential of providing consistent emotional care; however, it is also considered that they tend to provide care focusing on emotion.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
0.30
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信