热红外辐射和热扩散模型的验证和验证

I. Danilina, A. Gillespie, Matthew Smith, L. Balick, E. Abbott
{"title":"热红外辐射和热扩散模型的验证和验证","authors":"I. Danilina, A. Gillespie, Matthew Smith, L. Balick, E. Abbott","doi":"10.1109/WHISPERS.2010.5594932","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"A radiosity model used for predicting effective hyperspectral emissivity spectra and radiant temperatures for rough surfaces has been developed. Here we compare the computer model results to analytic model results in order to verify that the computer model is working properly, and validate the model results by comparison to spectra measured in the field by an hyperspectral imaging spectrometer. We measured a cm-scale DEM of the test scene using a tripod-based LiDAR. The discrepancies between analytical and modeled values are less than 0.01%. Modeled emissivity spectra deviate from the measured by no more than 0.015 emissivity units.","PeriodicalId":193944,"journal":{"name":"2010 2nd Workshop on Hyperspectral Image and Signal Processing: Evolution in Remote Sensing","volume":"22 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2010-06-14","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Thermal infrared radiosity and heat diffusion model verification and validation\",\"authors\":\"I. Danilina, A. Gillespie, Matthew Smith, L. Balick, E. Abbott\",\"doi\":\"10.1109/WHISPERS.2010.5594932\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"A radiosity model used for predicting effective hyperspectral emissivity spectra and radiant temperatures for rough surfaces has been developed. Here we compare the computer model results to analytic model results in order to verify that the computer model is working properly, and validate the model results by comparison to spectra measured in the field by an hyperspectral imaging spectrometer. We measured a cm-scale DEM of the test scene using a tripod-based LiDAR. The discrepancies between analytical and modeled values are less than 0.01%. Modeled emissivity spectra deviate from the measured by no more than 0.015 emissivity units.\",\"PeriodicalId\":193944,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"2010 2nd Workshop on Hyperspectral Image and Signal Processing: Evolution in Remote Sensing\",\"volume\":\"22 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2010-06-14\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"1\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"2010 2nd Workshop on Hyperspectral Image and Signal Processing: Evolution in Remote Sensing\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1109/WHISPERS.2010.5594932\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"2010 2nd Workshop on Hyperspectral Image and Signal Processing: Evolution in Remote Sensing","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/WHISPERS.2010.5594932","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

摘要

建立了一种用于预测粗糙表面的有效高光谱发射率光谱和辐射温度的辐射度模型。在这里,我们将计算机模型的结果与解析模型的结果进行比较,以验证计算机模型是否正常工作,并将模型结果与高光谱成像光谱仪在现场测量的光谱进行比较,以验证模型结果。我们使用基于三脚架的激光雷达测量了测试场景的厘米尺度DEM。分析值与模型值之间的差异小于0.01%。模型发射率光谱与实测值的偏差不超过0.015个发射率单位。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Thermal infrared radiosity and heat diffusion model verification and validation
A radiosity model used for predicting effective hyperspectral emissivity spectra and radiant temperatures for rough surfaces has been developed. Here we compare the computer model results to analytic model results in order to verify that the computer model is working properly, and validate the model results by comparison to spectra measured in the field by an hyperspectral imaging spectrometer. We measured a cm-scale DEM of the test scene using a tripod-based LiDAR. The discrepancies between analytical and modeled values are less than 0.01%. Modeled emissivity spectra deviate from the measured by no more than 0.015 emissivity units.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信