人工与自动化方法测定成釉细胞瘤中Ki-67免疫表达的比较

R. Gónzalez-Gónzalez, N. Molina-Frechero, Ramón G Carreón-Burciaga, Sandra López-Verdín, Carlos Robles-Bonilla, V. Pereira-Prado, R. Bologna-Molina
{"title":"人工与自动化方法测定成釉细胞瘤中Ki-67免疫表达的比较","authors":"R. Gónzalez-Gónzalez, N. Molina-Frechero, Ramón G Carreón-Burciaga, Sandra López-Verdín, Carlos Robles-Bonilla, V. Pereira-Prado, R. Bologna-Molina","doi":"10.1155/2016/7486989","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Ameloblastoma is a common and unpredictable odontogenic tumor with high relapse rates. Several studies assessing the proliferative capacity of these neoplasms have been published, mainly using the protein Ki-67. Cell counts must be completed to determine the cell proliferation rate. Multiple methods have been developed for this purpose. The most widely used method is the labeling index, which has undergone changes over time to better facilitate cell counting. Here, we compared manual cell counting methods with automated cell counting (ImmunoRatio) to determine the relative effectiveness of these methods. The results suggest that ImmunoRatio, a free software tool, may be highly advantageous and provide results similar to manual cell counting methods when used with the appropriate calibration. However, ImmunoRatio has flaws that may affect the labeling index results. Therefore, this automated cell counting method must be supplemented with manual cell counting methods.","PeriodicalId":313227,"journal":{"name":"Analytical Cellular Pathology (Amsterdam)","volume":"88 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2016-10-24","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"8","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Comparison between Manual and Automated Methods for Ki-67 Immunoexpression Quantification in Ameloblastomas\",\"authors\":\"R. Gónzalez-Gónzalez, N. Molina-Frechero, Ramón G Carreón-Burciaga, Sandra López-Verdín, Carlos Robles-Bonilla, V. Pereira-Prado, R. Bologna-Molina\",\"doi\":\"10.1155/2016/7486989\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Ameloblastoma is a common and unpredictable odontogenic tumor with high relapse rates. Several studies assessing the proliferative capacity of these neoplasms have been published, mainly using the protein Ki-67. Cell counts must be completed to determine the cell proliferation rate. Multiple methods have been developed for this purpose. The most widely used method is the labeling index, which has undergone changes over time to better facilitate cell counting. Here, we compared manual cell counting methods with automated cell counting (ImmunoRatio) to determine the relative effectiveness of these methods. The results suggest that ImmunoRatio, a free software tool, may be highly advantageous and provide results similar to manual cell counting methods when used with the appropriate calibration. However, ImmunoRatio has flaws that may affect the labeling index results. Therefore, this automated cell counting method must be supplemented with manual cell counting methods.\",\"PeriodicalId\":313227,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Analytical Cellular Pathology (Amsterdam)\",\"volume\":\"88 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2016-10-24\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"8\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Analytical Cellular Pathology (Amsterdam)\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1155/2016/7486989\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Analytical Cellular Pathology (Amsterdam)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1155/2016/7486989","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 8

摘要

成釉细胞瘤是一种常见且难以预测的牙源性肿瘤,复发率高。一些评估这些肿瘤增殖能力的研究已经发表,主要使用蛋白Ki-67。细胞计数必须完成,以确定细胞增殖率。为此目的开发了多种方法。最广泛使用的方法是标记指数,随着时间的推移,它发生了变化,以更好地方便细胞计数。在这里,我们比较了人工细胞计数方法和自动细胞计数方法(ImmunoRatio),以确定这些方法的相对有效性。结果表明,当使用适当的校准时,免费软件工具ImmunoRatio可能具有很高的优势,并提供与手动细胞计数方法相似的结果。然而,ImmunoRatio存在缺陷,可能会影响标记指标的结果。因此,这种自动细胞计数方法必须辅以人工细胞计数方法。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Comparison between Manual and Automated Methods for Ki-67 Immunoexpression Quantification in Ameloblastomas
Ameloblastoma is a common and unpredictable odontogenic tumor with high relapse rates. Several studies assessing the proliferative capacity of these neoplasms have been published, mainly using the protein Ki-67. Cell counts must be completed to determine the cell proliferation rate. Multiple methods have been developed for this purpose. The most widely used method is the labeling index, which has undergone changes over time to better facilitate cell counting. Here, we compared manual cell counting methods with automated cell counting (ImmunoRatio) to determine the relative effectiveness of these methods. The results suggest that ImmunoRatio, a free software tool, may be highly advantageous and provide results similar to manual cell counting methods when used with the appropriate calibration. However, ImmunoRatio has flaws that may affect the labeling index results. Therefore, this automated cell counting method must be supplemented with manual cell counting methods.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信