考虑web服务安全策略兼容性

Tristan Lavarack, M. Coetzee
{"title":"考虑web服务安全策略兼容性","authors":"Tristan Lavarack, M. Coetzee","doi":"10.1109/ISSA.2010.5588269","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"For most organizations supporting business-to-business (B2B) web services interactions, security is a growing concern. Web services providers and consumers document their primary and alternative security policy requirements and capabilities in security policy files, defined by WS-Policy, WS-SecurityPolicy and WS-Security syntax. To secure message exchanges to the satisfaction of all parties, the security requirements of both web services providers and consumers need to be satisfied. This paper investigates how mutually agreed-upon security policies can be created. An analysis of the policy intersection algorithm highlights its deficiencies for finding mutually compatible policies. The interrelated effect that security policy assertion choices have on each other is identified as an important aspect not yet considered. Over and above security policy assertions, other influence on security policy choices, which may affect the security level supported by the organization, is identified. A proposal is made on how the assertions of two security policies should be considered, in order to create a secure, mutually agreed-upon security policy that will satisfy the requirements of both parties.","PeriodicalId":423118,"journal":{"name":"2010 Information Security for South Africa","volume":"299 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2010-09-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"10","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Considering web services security policy compatibility\",\"authors\":\"Tristan Lavarack, M. Coetzee\",\"doi\":\"10.1109/ISSA.2010.5588269\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"For most organizations supporting business-to-business (B2B) web services interactions, security is a growing concern. Web services providers and consumers document their primary and alternative security policy requirements and capabilities in security policy files, defined by WS-Policy, WS-SecurityPolicy and WS-Security syntax. To secure message exchanges to the satisfaction of all parties, the security requirements of both web services providers and consumers need to be satisfied. This paper investigates how mutually agreed-upon security policies can be created. An analysis of the policy intersection algorithm highlights its deficiencies for finding mutually compatible policies. The interrelated effect that security policy assertion choices have on each other is identified as an important aspect not yet considered. Over and above security policy assertions, other influence on security policy choices, which may affect the security level supported by the organization, is identified. A proposal is made on how the assertions of two security policies should be considered, in order to create a secure, mutually agreed-upon security policy that will satisfy the requirements of both parties.\",\"PeriodicalId\":423118,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"2010 Information Security for South Africa\",\"volume\":\"299 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2010-09-30\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"10\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"2010 Information Security for South Africa\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1109/ISSA.2010.5588269\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"2010 Information Security for South Africa","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/ISSA.2010.5588269","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 10

摘要

对于大多数支持企业对企业(B2B) web服务交互的组织来说,安全性日益受到关注。Web服务提供者和消费者在由WS-Policy、WS-SecurityPolicy和WS-Security语法定义的安全策略文件中记录其主要和可选的安全策略需求和功能。为了确保消息交换的安全性,使各方都满意,需要同时满足web服务提供者和使用者的安全性需求。本文研究如何创建相互同意的安全策略。通过对策略交集算法的分析,指出了该算法在寻找相互兼容策略方面的不足。安全策略断言选择之间相互关联的影响被认为是尚未考虑的一个重要方面。除了安全策略断言之外,还确定了对安全策略选择的其他影响,这些影响可能会影响组织支持的安全级别。建议如何考虑两个安全策略的断言,以便创建一个安全的、相互同意的安全策略,该策略将满足双方的需求。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Considering web services security policy compatibility
For most organizations supporting business-to-business (B2B) web services interactions, security is a growing concern. Web services providers and consumers document their primary and alternative security policy requirements and capabilities in security policy files, defined by WS-Policy, WS-SecurityPolicy and WS-Security syntax. To secure message exchanges to the satisfaction of all parties, the security requirements of both web services providers and consumers need to be satisfied. This paper investigates how mutually agreed-upon security policies can be created. An analysis of the policy intersection algorithm highlights its deficiencies for finding mutually compatible policies. The interrelated effect that security policy assertion choices have on each other is identified as an important aspect not yet considered. Over and above security policy assertions, other influence on security policy choices, which may affect the security level supported by the organization, is identified. A proposal is made on how the assertions of two security policies should be considered, in order to create a secure, mutually agreed-upon security policy that will satisfy the requirements of both parties.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信