低浓度布比卡因溶液阻断周围神经的时间取决于佐剂

М. М. Барса
{"title":"低浓度布比卡因溶液阻断周围神经的时间取决于佐剂","authors":"М. М. Барса","doi":"10.25284/2519-2078.3(92).2020.211431","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Background. In recent years, anesthesiology has shown a tendency to reduce the use of narcotic analgesics intra- and postoperatively. This is due to respiratory depression and as a result – hypoxia in the postoperative period. In addition, the use of narcotic analgesics does not allow the patient to mobilize in the early postoperative period, which in turn increases the risk of thromboembolic complications, especially in elderly patients and patients with obesity. However, withdrawal from a narcotic analgesic should not affect the patient’s postoperative comfort and pain-relief. The rapid progress in the development of regional methods of analgesia has significantly reduced the use of narcotic analgesics intra and post operatively and has provided sufficient pain relief for patients. Despite the results achieved, we continue to search for the perfect combination of local anesthetic and adjuvants to ensure long-lasting and safe analgesia. Objective. Suggest a new combination of local anesthetics and adjuvants, compare the duration of postoperative analgesia after peripheral nerve blocks with low concentration bupivacaine solution with dexamethasone and low concentration bupivacaine with dexamethasone and epinephrine. Explore the possibility of orthopedic surgery without using narcotic anesthetics. with solution of bupivacaine 0,375% and dexamethasone 0,02%; Group 2 – patients whose blockade was performed with a solution of bupivacaine 0,375% with dexamethasone 0,02% and epinephrine 0,00018%. The duration of the blockade was estimated by puncturing the skin with a needle. Pain intensity was assessed at the 6th, 12th, 24th and 36th hours after blockade using a VAS scale. The amount of narcotic anesthetic used in the postoperative period were also recorded. In addition, patients underwent electromyography of the innervation area of the blocked nerve before the surgery and 24 and 36 hours after surgery. Results. The duration of blockade in Group 2 was longer by 10 hours, the intensity of pain (VAS) was significantly higher after 24 hours (1.65 ± 1.35 in Group 2 and 5.3 ± 1.26 in Group 1). According to electromyography, 24 hours after the blockade conductance in Group 1 was restored by 95-100%, unlike Group 2, where conductivity was restored by only 47-59%. Conclusions. The proposed combination of local anesthetics and adjuvants provides both adequate anesthesia during surgery and prolonged post-operative analgesia.","PeriodicalId":355172,"journal":{"name":"Pain, Anaesthesia and Intensive Care","volume":"26 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2020-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"DURATION OF BLOCKADE OF PERIPHERAL NERVES WITH LOW CONCENTRATED BUPIVACAINE SOLUTION DEPENDING OF THE ADJUVANTS\",\"authors\":\"М. М. Барса\",\"doi\":\"10.25284/2519-2078.3(92).2020.211431\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Background. In recent years, anesthesiology has shown a tendency to reduce the use of narcotic analgesics intra- and postoperatively. This is due to respiratory depression and as a result – hypoxia in the postoperative period. In addition, the use of narcotic analgesics does not allow the patient to mobilize in the early postoperative period, which in turn increases the risk of thromboembolic complications, especially in elderly patients and patients with obesity. However, withdrawal from a narcotic analgesic should not affect the patient’s postoperative comfort and pain-relief. The rapid progress in the development of regional methods of analgesia has significantly reduced the use of narcotic analgesics intra and post operatively and has provided sufficient pain relief for patients. Despite the results achieved, we continue to search for the perfect combination of local anesthetic and adjuvants to ensure long-lasting and safe analgesia. Objective. Suggest a new combination of local anesthetics and adjuvants, compare the duration of postoperative analgesia after peripheral nerve blocks with low concentration bupivacaine solution with dexamethasone and low concentration bupivacaine with dexamethasone and epinephrine. Explore the possibility of orthopedic surgery without using narcotic anesthetics. with solution of bupivacaine 0,375% and dexamethasone 0,02%; Group 2 – patients whose blockade was performed with a solution of bupivacaine 0,375% with dexamethasone 0,02% and epinephrine 0,00018%. The duration of the blockade was estimated by puncturing the skin with a needle. Pain intensity was assessed at the 6th, 12th, 24th and 36th hours after blockade using a VAS scale. The amount of narcotic anesthetic used in the postoperative period were also recorded. In addition, patients underwent electromyography of the innervation area of the blocked nerve before the surgery and 24 and 36 hours after surgery. Results. The duration of blockade in Group 2 was longer by 10 hours, the intensity of pain (VAS) was significantly higher after 24 hours (1.65 ± 1.35 in Group 2 and 5.3 ± 1.26 in Group 1). According to electromyography, 24 hours after the blockade conductance in Group 1 was restored by 95-100%, unlike Group 2, where conductivity was restored by only 47-59%. Conclusions. The proposed combination of local anesthetics and adjuvants provides both adequate anesthesia during surgery and prolonged post-operative analgesia.\",\"PeriodicalId\":355172,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Pain, Anaesthesia and Intensive Care\",\"volume\":\"26 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2020-09-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"1\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Pain, Anaesthesia and Intensive Care\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.25284/2519-2078.3(92).2020.211431\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Pain, Anaesthesia and Intensive Care","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.25284/2519-2078.3(92).2020.211431","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

摘要

背景。近年来,麻醉学显示出在手术中和术后减少使用麻醉性镇痛药的趋势。这是由于呼吸抑制和术后缺氧造成的。此外,麻醉镇痛药的使用使患者在术后早期不能活动,这反过来又增加了血栓栓塞并发症的风险,尤其是老年患者和肥胖患者。然而,停用麻醉性镇痛药不应影响患者术后的舒适和疼痛缓解。局部镇痛方法的快速发展显著减少了术中、术后麻醉性镇痛药物的使用,为患者提供了充分的疼痛缓解。尽管取得了成果,我们仍在继续寻找局部麻醉剂和佐剂的完美组合,以确保持久和安全的镇痛。目标。建议一种新的局麻药与佐剂联合使用,比较低浓度布比卡因溶液与地塞米松、低浓度布比卡因与地塞米松、肾上腺素联合应用周围神经阻滞术后的镇痛时间。探讨骨科手术不使用麻醉麻醉药的可能性。布比卡因0.0375%,地塞米松0.02%;2组:布比卡因0.375%,地塞米松0.02%,肾上腺素0.00018%。封锁的持续时间是通过用针头刺穿皮肤来估计的。分别于阻断后第6、12、24、36小时采用VAS评分法评估疼痛强度。同时记录术后麻醉麻醉剂的用量。此外,患者在手术前和术后24、36小时对阻滞神经的神经支配区进行肌电图检查。结果。阻断组2的持续时间延长了10小时,24小时后疼痛强度(VAS)明显升高(2组为1.65±1.35,1组为5.3±1.26)。肌电图显示,阻断后24小时,1组的电导率恢复了95-100%,而2组的电导率仅恢复了47-59%。结论。局部麻醉剂和佐剂的联合使用既能在手术中提供足够的麻醉,又能延长术后镇痛时间。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
DURATION OF BLOCKADE OF PERIPHERAL NERVES WITH LOW CONCENTRATED BUPIVACAINE SOLUTION DEPENDING OF THE ADJUVANTS
Background. In recent years, anesthesiology has shown a tendency to reduce the use of narcotic analgesics intra- and postoperatively. This is due to respiratory depression and as a result – hypoxia in the postoperative period. In addition, the use of narcotic analgesics does not allow the patient to mobilize in the early postoperative period, which in turn increases the risk of thromboembolic complications, especially in elderly patients and patients with obesity. However, withdrawal from a narcotic analgesic should not affect the patient’s postoperative comfort and pain-relief. The rapid progress in the development of regional methods of analgesia has significantly reduced the use of narcotic analgesics intra and post operatively and has provided sufficient pain relief for patients. Despite the results achieved, we continue to search for the perfect combination of local anesthetic and adjuvants to ensure long-lasting and safe analgesia. Objective. Suggest a new combination of local anesthetics and adjuvants, compare the duration of postoperative analgesia after peripheral nerve blocks with low concentration bupivacaine solution with dexamethasone and low concentration bupivacaine with dexamethasone and epinephrine. Explore the possibility of orthopedic surgery without using narcotic anesthetics. with solution of bupivacaine 0,375% and dexamethasone 0,02%; Group 2 – patients whose blockade was performed with a solution of bupivacaine 0,375% with dexamethasone 0,02% and epinephrine 0,00018%. The duration of the blockade was estimated by puncturing the skin with a needle. Pain intensity was assessed at the 6th, 12th, 24th and 36th hours after blockade using a VAS scale. The amount of narcotic anesthetic used in the postoperative period were also recorded. In addition, patients underwent electromyography of the innervation area of the blocked nerve before the surgery and 24 and 36 hours after surgery. Results. The duration of blockade in Group 2 was longer by 10 hours, the intensity of pain (VAS) was significantly higher after 24 hours (1.65 ± 1.35 in Group 2 and 5.3 ± 1.26 in Group 1). According to electromyography, 24 hours after the blockade conductance in Group 1 was restored by 95-100%, unlike Group 2, where conductivity was restored by only 47-59%. Conclusions. The proposed combination of local anesthetics and adjuvants provides both adequate anesthesia during surgery and prolonged post-operative analgesia.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信