防止安全漏洞的对等代码审查:经验评估

Amiangshu Bosu, Jeffrey C. Carver
{"title":"防止安全漏洞的对等代码审查:经验评估","authors":"Amiangshu Bosu, Jeffrey C. Carver","doi":"10.1109/SERE-C.2013.22","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Peer code review, as an effective quality improvement practice, has also been considered important for reducing security vulnerabilities. There is a lack of empirical evidence to quantify and support this claim. Therefore, we propose a research plan to analyze mature open source projects to gather empirical evidence regarding the relationship between peer code review and security vulnerabilities. As a proof-of-concept, we analyzed the Chromium OS project and found that reviewers identified potential vulnerabilities in 32 review requests.","PeriodicalId":150535,"journal":{"name":"2013 IEEE Seventh International Conference on Software Security and Reliability Companion","volume":"4 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2013-06-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"20","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Peer Code Review to Prevent Security Vulnerabilities: An Empirical Evaluation\",\"authors\":\"Amiangshu Bosu, Jeffrey C. Carver\",\"doi\":\"10.1109/SERE-C.2013.22\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Peer code review, as an effective quality improvement practice, has also been considered important for reducing security vulnerabilities. There is a lack of empirical evidence to quantify and support this claim. Therefore, we propose a research plan to analyze mature open source projects to gather empirical evidence regarding the relationship between peer code review and security vulnerabilities. As a proof-of-concept, we analyzed the Chromium OS project and found that reviewers identified potential vulnerabilities in 32 review requests.\",\"PeriodicalId\":150535,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"2013 IEEE Seventh International Conference on Software Security and Reliability Companion\",\"volume\":\"4 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2013-06-18\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"20\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"2013 IEEE Seventh International Conference on Software Security and Reliability Companion\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1109/SERE-C.2013.22\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"2013 IEEE Seventh International Conference on Software Security and Reliability Companion","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/SERE-C.2013.22","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 20

摘要

对等代码审查,作为一种有效的质量改进实践,对于减少安全漏洞也被认为是重要的。缺乏经验证据来量化和支持这一说法。因此,我们提出了一个研究计划来分析成熟的开源项目,以收集关于同行代码审查与安全漏洞之间关系的经验证据。作为概念验证,我们分析了Chromium OS项目,发现审查人员在32个审查请求中发现了潜在的漏洞。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Peer Code Review to Prevent Security Vulnerabilities: An Empirical Evaluation
Peer code review, as an effective quality improvement practice, has also been considered important for reducing security vulnerabilities. There is a lack of empirical evidence to quantify and support this claim. Therefore, we propose a research plan to analyze mature open source projects to gather empirical evidence regarding the relationship between peer code review and security vulnerabilities. As a proof-of-concept, we analyzed the Chromium OS project and found that reviewers identified potential vulnerabilities in 32 review requests.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信