{"title":"防止安全漏洞的对等代码审查:经验评估","authors":"Amiangshu Bosu, Jeffrey C. Carver","doi":"10.1109/SERE-C.2013.22","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Peer code review, as an effective quality improvement practice, has also been considered important for reducing security vulnerabilities. There is a lack of empirical evidence to quantify and support this claim. Therefore, we propose a research plan to analyze mature open source projects to gather empirical evidence regarding the relationship between peer code review and security vulnerabilities. As a proof-of-concept, we analyzed the Chromium OS project and found that reviewers identified potential vulnerabilities in 32 review requests.","PeriodicalId":150535,"journal":{"name":"2013 IEEE Seventh International Conference on Software Security and Reliability Companion","volume":"4 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2013-06-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"20","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Peer Code Review to Prevent Security Vulnerabilities: An Empirical Evaluation\",\"authors\":\"Amiangshu Bosu, Jeffrey C. Carver\",\"doi\":\"10.1109/SERE-C.2013.22\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Peer code review, as an effective quality improvement practice, has also been considered important for reducing security vulnerabilities. There is a lack of empirical evidence to quantify and support this claim. Therefore, we propose a research plan to analyze mature open source projects to gather empirical evidence regarding the relationship between peer code review and security vulnerabilities. As a proof-of-concept, we analyzed the Chromium OS project and found that reviewers identified potential vulnerabilities in 32 review requests.\",\"PeriodicalId\":150535,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"2013 IEEE Seventh International Conference on Software Security and Reliability Companion\",\"volume\":\"4 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2013-06-18\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"20\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"2013 IEEE Seventh International Conference on Software Security and Reliability Companion\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1109/SERE-C.2013.22\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"2013 IEEE Seventh International Conference on Software Security and Reliability Companion","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/SERE-C.2013.22","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
Peer Code Review to Prevent Security Vulnerabilities: An Empirical Evaluation
Peer code review, as an effective quality improvement practice, has also been considered important for reducing security vulnerabilities. There is a lack of empirical evidence to quantify and support this claim. Therefore, we propose a research plan to analyze mature open source projects to gather empirical evidence regarding the relationship between peer code review and security vulnerabilities. As a proof-of-concept, we analyzed the Chromium OS project and found that reviewers identified potential vulnerabilities in 32 review requests.