HIV疾病前庭功能障碍筛查问题的诊断价值:一项初步研究

Peter L Nguy, Deanna Ware, Cameron Kelly, M. Plankey
{"title":"HIV疾病前庭功能障碍筛查问题的诊断价值:一项初步研究","authors":"Peter L Nguy, Deanna Ware, Cameron Kelly, M. Plankey","doi":"10.52504/001C.21372","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"**Introduction:** A number of vestibular function tests have been used to evaluate vestibular symptoms among people living with HIV (PLWH). However, these tests are inconsistent due to poor sensitivity and specificity. This study attempts to identify sensitive and specific vestibular symptoms that may be useful in selecting appropriate HIV-positive adults for clinical vestibular function tests.\n\n**Methods:** Participants were enrolled from the Baltimore-Washington, DC, site of the Multicenter AIDS Cohort Study and the Washington, DC, site of the Women's Interagency HIV Study. A total of 246 participants were evaluated using the Dix-Hallpike (DH) maneuver and the eyes closed, standing on foam (ECF) position in the Romberg test, and completed the Adult Balance and Dizziness Supplemental questionnaire of the 2008 National Health Interview Survey. The sensitivity and specificity were calculated using self-reported vestibular dysfunction from the questionnaire data compared with vestibular dysfunction determined by clinical testing.\n\n**Results:** Sixty participants (24.4%) reported vestibular dysfunction. The prevalence of abnormal tests was 40.8% for DH--any nystagmus, 1.5% for DH--classical nystagmus, 40.3% for DH--nonclassical nystagmus, 38.3% for gaze-evoked nystagmus, and 15.7% for Romberg ECF. Sensitivity of self-reported vestibular symptoms for all vestibular function tests reported ranged from 23.1% to 50.0%. These symptoms were moderately specific and ranged from 73.3% to 77.9%.\n\n**Conclusions:** Despite adequate specificity, the low sensitivity of self-reported symptoms of vestibular dysfunction were not useful to rule out a vestibular disorder in this sample of middle-aged PLWH. Therefore, clinical testing is needed to confirm the diagnosis of a vestibular disorder in the management of HIV disease.","PeriodicalId":340325,"journal":{"name":"Georgetown Medical Review","volume":"39 19","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-03-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Diagnostic Value of Screening Questions for Vestibular Dysfunction in HIV Disease: A Pilot Study\",\"authors\":\"Peter L Nguy, Deanna Ware, Cameron Kelly, M. Plankey\",\"doi\":\"10.52504/001C.21372\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"**Introduction:** A number of vestibular function tests have been used to evaluate vestibular symptoms among people living with HIV (PLWH). However, these tests are inconsistent due to poor sensitivity and specificity. This study attempts to identify sensitive and specific vestibular symptoms that may be useful in selecting appropriate HIV-positive adults for clinical vestibular function tests.\\n\\n**Methods:** Participants were enrolled from the Baltimore-Washington, DC, site of the Multicenter AIDS Cohort Study and the Washington, DC, site of the Women's Interagency HIV Study. A total of 246 participants were evaluated using the Dix-Hallpike (DH) maneuver and the eyes closed, standing on foam (ECF) position in the Romberg test, and completed the Adult Balance and Dizziness Supplemental questionnaire of the 2008 National Health Interview Survey. The sensitivity and specificity were calculated using self-reported vestibular dysfunction from the questionnaire data compared with vestibular dysfunction determined by clinical testing.\\n\\n**Results:** Sixty participants (24.4%) reported vestibular dysfunction. The prevalence of abnormal tests was 40.8% for DH--any nystagmus, 1.5% for DH--classical nystagmus, 40.3% for DH--nonclassical nystagmus, 38.3% for gaze-evoked nystagmus, and 15.7% for Romberg ECF. Sensitivity of self-reported vestibular symptoms for all vestibular function tests reported ranged from 23.1% to 50.0%. These symptoms were moderately specific and ranged from 73.3% to 77.9%.\\n\\n**Conclusions:** Despite adequate specificity, the low sensitivity of self-reported symptoms of vestibular dysfunction were not useful to rule out a vestibular disorder in this sample of middle-aged PLWH. Therefore, clinical testing is needed to confirm the diagnosis of a vestibular disorder in the management of HIV disease.\",\"PeriodicalId\":340325,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Georgetown Medical Review\",\"volume\":\"39 19\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2021-03-23\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Georgetown Medical Review\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.52504/001C.21372\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Georgetown Medical Review","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.52504/001C.21372","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

**简介:**一些前庭功能测试已被用于评估艾滋病毒感染者(PLWH)的前庭症状。然而,由于灵敏度和特异性差,这些测试不一致。本研究试图确定敏感和特异性的前庭症状,这可能有助于选择合适的hiv阳性成人进行临床前庭功能测试。**方法:**参与者从巴尔的摩-华盛顿特区多中心艾滋病队列研究和华盛顿特区妇女跨机构艾滋病毒研究中心招募。采用dick - hallpike (DH)手法和Romberg测试中的闭眼泡沫站立(ECF)体位对246名参与者进行评估,并填写2008年全国健康访谈调查成人平衡与头晕补充问卷。敏感度和特异度的计算采用问卷数据中自述的前庭功能障碍与临床检测确定的前庭功能障碍进行比较。**结果:60名参与者(24.4%)报告前庭功能障碍。DH-任何眼震的异常检查率为40.8%,DH-经典眼震为1.5%,DH-非经典眼震为40.3%,凝视诱发眼震为38.3%,Romberg ECF为15.7%。自述前庭症状对所有前庭功能测试报告的敏感性从23.1%到50.0%不等。这些症状具有中等特异性,范围为73.3%至77.9%。**结论:**尽管有足够的特异性,但自述前庭功能障碍症状的低敏感性不能用于排除该中年PLWH样本中的前庭功能障碍。因此,需要临床试验来确认HIV疾病管理中前庭功能障碍的诊断。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Diagnostic Value of Screening Questions for Vestibular Dysfunction in HIV Disease: A Pilot Study
**Introduction:** A number of vestibular function tests have been used to evaluate vestibular symptoms among people living with HIV (PLWH). However, these tests are inconsistent due to poor sensitivity and specificity. This study attempts to identify sensitive and specific vestibular symptoms that may be useful in selecting appropriate HIV-positive adults for clinical vestibular function tests. **Methods:** Participants were enrolled from the Baltimore-Washington, DC, site of the Multicenter AIDS Cohort Study and the Washington, DC, site of the Women's Interagency HIV Study. A total of 246 participants were evaluated using the Dix-Hallpike (DH) maneuver and the eyes closed, standing on foam (ECF) position in the Romberg test, and completed the Adult Balance and Dizziness Supplemental questionnaire of the 2008 National Health Interview Survey. The sensitivity and specificity were calculated using self-reported vestibular dysfunction from the questionnaire data compared with vestibular dysfunction determined by clinical testing. **Results:** Sixty participants (24.4%) reported vestibular dysfunction. The prevalence of abnormal tests was 40.8% for DH--any nystagmus, 1.5% for DH--classical nystagmus, 40.3% for DH--nonclassical nystagmus, 38.3% for gaze-evoked nystagmus, and 15.7% for Romberg ECF. Sensitivity of self-reported vestibular symptoms for all vestibular function tests reported ranged from 23.1% to 50.0%. These symptoms were moderately specific and ranged from 73.3% to 77.9%. **Conclusions:** Despite adequate specificity, the low sensitivity of self-reported symptoms of vestibular dysfunction were not useful to rule out a vestibular disorder in this sample of middle-aged PLWH. Therefore, clinical testing is needed to confirm the diagnosis of a vestibular disorder in the management of HIV disease.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信