为软件可测试性设计的精益方法

A. Alwardt, Nathan Mikeska, Richard J. Pandorf, Philip R. Tarpley
{"title":"为软件可测试性设计的精益方法","authors":"A. Alwardt, Nathan Mikeska, Richard J. Pandorf, Philip R. Tarpley","doi":"10.1109/AUTEST.2009.5314039","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"It is common practice for military hardware to be designed for testability; however, the testability of software is rarely considered. When software testability is addressed, the resultant design often does not readily support full coverage automated testing. Since software products must be tested to verify requirements are met, it only makes sense to consider software testability from day one of a project. Once the decision has been made to embrace the concept of designing testable software, there are best practices that enable a lean software development process. This paper will discuss 1) designing for software testability; 2) the automated software regression testing approach; 3) the correlation to Extreme Programming (XP); 4) Lean 123 costs and benefits; 5) an example of how to create an automated software regression test; and 6) the applicability of this approach to all software efforts.","PeriodicalId":187421,"journal":{"name":"2009 IEEE AUTOTESTCON","volume":"13 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2009-11-06","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"8","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"A lean approach to designing for software testability\",\"authors\":\"A. Alwardt, Nathan Mikeska, Richard J. Pandorf, Philip R. Tarpley\",\"doi\":\"10.1109/AUTEST.2009.5314039\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"It is common practice for military hardware to be designed for testability; however, the testability of software is rarely considered. When software testability is addressed, the resultant design often does not readily support full coverage automated testing. Since software products must be tested to verify requirements are met, it only makes sense to consider software testability from day one of a project. Once the decision has been made to embrace the concept of designing testable software, there are best practices that enable a lean software development process. This paper will discuss 1) designing for software testability; 2) the automated software regression testing approach; 3) the correlation to Extreme Programming (XP); 4) Lean 123 costs and benefits; 5) an example of how to create an automated software regression test; and 6) the applicability of this approach to all software efforts.\",\"PeriodicalId\":187421,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"2009 IEEE AUTOTESTCON\",\"volume\":\"13 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2009-11-06\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"8\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"2009 IEEE AUTOTESTCON\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1109/AUTEST.2009.5314039\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"2009 IEEE AUTOTESTCON","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/AUTEST.2009.5314039","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 8

摘要

通常的做法是军用硬件设计为可测试性;然而,软件的可测试性却很少被考虑。当解决了软件可测试性问题时,最终的设计通常不支持完全覆盖的自动化测试。由于必须对软件产品进行测试以验证需求是否得到满足,因此从项目的第一天开始考虑软件的可测试性才有意义。一旦决定采用设计可测试软件的概念,就会有一些最佳实践来支持精益软件开发过程。本文将讨论1)软件可测试性设计;2)自动化软件回归测试方法;3)与极限编程(XP)的相关性;4)精益123成本效益;5)如何创建一个自动化软件回归测试的例子;6)这种方法对所有软件工作的适用性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
A lean approach to designing for software testability
It is common practice for military hardware to be designed for testability; however, the testability of software is rarely considered. When software testability is addressed, the resultant design often does not readily support full coverage automated testing. Since software products must be tested to verify requirements are met, it only makes sense to consider software testability from day one of a project. Once the decision has been made to embrace the concept of designing testable software, there are best practices that enable a lean software development process. This paper will discuss 1) designing for software testability; 2) the automated software regression testing approach; 3) the correlation to Extreme Programming (XP); 4) Lean 123 costs and benefits; 5) an example of how to create an automated software regression test; and 6) the applicability of this approach to all software efforts.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信