容忍恶意崩溃的用餐哲学家

Mikhail Nesterenko, A. Arora
{"title":"容忍恶意崩溃的用餐哲学家","authors":"Mikhail Nesterenko, A. Arora","doi":"10.1109/ICDCS.2002.1022256","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"We present a solution to the problem of dining philosophers. Our solution tolerates malicious crashes. In a malicious crash the failed process behaves arbitrarily for a finite time and then ceases all operation undetectably to other processes. The tolerance of our solution is achieved by the combination of stabilization and crash failure locality. Stabilization allows our program to recover from an arbitrary state. Crash failure locality ensures that only a limited number of processes are affected by a process crash. The crash failure locality of our solution is optimal. Finally, we argue that the malicious crash fault model and its extensions are worthy of further study as they admit tolerances that are not achieved under stronger fault models and are unnecessary under weaker fault models.","PeriodicalId":186210,"journal":{"name":"Proceedings 22nd International Conference on Distributed Computing Systems","volume":"31 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2002-07-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"31","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Dining philosophers that tolerate malicious crashes\",\"authors\":\"Mikhail Nesterenko, A. Arora\",\"doi\":\"10.1109/ICDCS.2002.1022256\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"We present a solution to the problem of dining philosophers. Our solution tolerates malicious crashes. In a malicious crash the failed process behaves arbitrarily for a finite time and then ceases all operation undetectably to other processes. The tolerance of our solution is achieved by the combination of stabilization and crash failure locality. Stabilization allows our program to recover from an arbitrary state. Crash failure locality ensures that only a limited number of processes are affected by a process crash. The crash failure locality of our solution is optimal. Finally, we argue that the malicious crash fault model and its extensions are worthy of further study as they admit tolerances that are not achieved under stronger fault models and are unnecessary under weaker fault models.\",\"PeriodicalId\":186210,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Proceedings 22nd International Conference on Distributed Computing Systems\",\"volume\":\"31 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2002-07-02\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"31\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Proceedings 22nd International Conference on Distributed Computing Systems\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1109/ICDCS.2002.1022256\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Proceedings 22nd International Conference on Distributed Computing Systems","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/ICDCS.2002.1022256","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 31

摘要

我们提出了一个解决哲学家吃饭问题的办法。我们的解决方案允许恶意崩溃。在恶意崩溃中,失败的进程在有限的时间内表现出任意行为,然后在其他进程无法察觉的情况下停止所有操作。我们的解决方案的容忍度是通过稳定和碰撞失效局域性的结合来实现的。稳定允许我们的程序从任意状态恢复。崩溃故障局部性确保只有有限数量的进程受到进程崩溃的影响。我们的解决方案的崩溃故障局部是最优的。最后,我们认为恶意崩溃故障模型及其扩展是值得进一步研究的,因为它们承认在强故障模型下无法实现的容差,在弱故障模型下是不必要的。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Dining philosophers that tolerate malicious crashes
We present a solution to the problem of dining philosophers. Our solution tolerates malicious crashes. In a malicious crash the failed process behaves arbitrarily for a finite time and then ceases all operation undetectably to other processes. The tolerance of our solution is achieved by the combination of stabilization and crash failure locality. Stabilization allows our program to recover from an arbitrary state. Crash failure locality ensures that only a limited number of processes are affected by a process crash. The crash failure locality of our solution is optimal. Finally, we argue that the malicious crash fault model and its extensions are worthy of further study as they admit tolerances that are not achieved under stronger fault models and are unnecessary under weaker fault models.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信