Danielle Alves Brêtas, J. Vitor, Faria Nogueira, Michelle Vieira Carneiro, Renato Aparecido de Souza, Adriano Prado Simão
{"title":"胶带法评估下肢伸展差异的检验员内部可靠性分析","authors":"Danielle Alves Brêtas, J. Vitor, Faria Nogueira, Michelle Vieira Carneiro, Renato Aparecido de Souza, Adriano Prado Simão","doi":"10.3900/FPJ.8.5.335.S","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Introduction: The aim of this study was to analyze the intra-examiner reliability of the tape method (TM) measure to leg length discrepancy (LLD) on symptomatic and asymptomatic volunteers, and verify if the presence of deformities in low limbs (LL), history of fracture in LL and obesity influence the level of LLD. Materials and Methods: One trained examiner performed measurements of both lower limbs in two different occasions, with an interval of 48 hours between them. The sample consisted of 37 volunteers (28 women and 9 men) characterized as follows: history of fracture of lower limbs (n=5), presence of deformities of lower limbs (n=9), obese (n=9) and asymptomatic (n=14). The intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC), Pearson’s correlation (reliability of the measures) and t-test for independent samples (influence of symptoms on the level of LLD) were used. Results: While the volunteers had asymptomatic value of r=0.98, symptomatic volunteers were classified as small reliability. Furthermore, there was no difference in the level of severity of DCMI among the volunteers (p>0.05). Discussion: It was concluded that the TM measure to LLD is reliable for your application if include asymptomatic individuals.","PeriodicalId":164994,"journal":{"name":"Fitness & Performance Journal","volume":"334 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2009-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"análisis dE la fiabilidad intra-Examinador dEl método dE cinta para Evaluación dE la difErEncia dE ExtEnsión dE las ExtrEmidadEs infEriorEs\",\"authors\":\"Danielle Alves Brêtas, J. Vitor, Faria Nogueira, Michelle Vieira Carneiro, Renato Aparecido de Souza, Adriano Prado Simão\",\"doi\":\"10.3900/FPJ.8.5.335.S\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Introduction: The aim of this study was to analyze the intra-examiner reliability of the tape method (TM) measure to leg length discrepancy (LLD) on symptomatic and asymptomatic volunteers, and verify if the presence of deformities in low limbs (LL), history of fracture in LL and obesity influence the level of LLD. Materials and Methods: One trained examiner performed measurements of both lower limbs in two different occasions, with an interval of 48 hours between them. The sample consisted of 37 volunteers (28 women and 9 men) characterized as follows: history of fracture of lower limbs (n=5), presence of deformities of lower limbs (n=9), obese (n=9) and asymptomatic (n=14). The intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC), Pearson’s correlation (reliability of the measures) and t-test for independent samples (influence of symptoms on the level of LLD) were used. Results: While the volunteers had asymptomatic value of r=0.98, symptomatic volunteers were classified as small reliability. Furthermore, there was no difference in the level of severity of DCMI among the volunteers (p>0.05). Discussion: It was concluded that the TM measure to LLD is reliable for your application if include asymptomatic individuals.\",\"PeriodicalId\":164994,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Fitness & Performance Journal\",\"volume\":\"334 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2009-09-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Fitness & Performance Journal\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.3900/FPJ.8.5.335.S\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Fitness & Performance Journal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3900/FPJ.8.5.335.S","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
análisis dE la fiabilidad intra-Examinador dEl método dE cinta para Evaluación dE la difErEncia dE ExtEnsión dE las ExtrEmidadEs infEriorEs
Introduction: The aim of this study was to analyze the intra-examiner reliability of the tape method (TM) measure to leg length discrepancy (LLD) on symptomatic and asymptomatic volunteers, and verify if the presence of deformities in low limbs (LL), history of fracture in LL and obesity influence the level of LLD. Materials and Methods: One trained examiner performed measurements of both lower limbs in two different occasions, with an interval of 48 hours between them. The sample consisted of 37 volunteers (28 women and 9 men) characterized as follows: history of fracture of lower limbs (n=5), presence of deformities of lower limbs (n=9), obese (n=9) and asymptomatic (n=14). The intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC), Pearson’s correlation (reliability of the measures) and t-test for independent samples (influence of symptoms on the level of LLD) were used. Results: While the volunteers had asymptomatic value of r=0.98, symptomatic volunteers were classified as small reliability. Furthermore, there was no difference in the level of severity of DCMI among the volunteers (p>0.05). Discussion: It was concluded that the TM measure to LLD is reliable for your application if include asymptomatic individuals.