在多处理器系统中使用精确的可行性测试来分配实时任务

S. Sáez, Joan Vila i Carbó, A. Crespo
{"title":"在多处理器系统中使用精确的可行性测试来分配实时任务","authors":"S. Sáez, Joan Vila i Carbó, A. Crespo","doi":"10.1109/EMWRTS.1998.685068","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The paper introduces improvements in partitioning schemes for multiprocessor real time systems which allow higher processor utilization and enhanced schedulability by using exact feasibility tests to evaluate the schedulability limit of a processor. The paper analyzes how to combine these tests with existing bin packing algorithms for processor allocation and provides new variants which are exhaustively evaluated using two assumptions: variable and fixed number of processors. The problem of evaluating these algorithms is complex, since metrics are usually based on comparing the performance of a given algorithm to an optimal one, but determining optimals is often NP hard on multiprocessors. This problem has been overcome by defining lower or upper bounds on the performance of an optimal algorithm and then defining metrics with respect these bounds. The evaluation has shown that the algorithms exhibit extremely good behavior and they can be considered very close to the maximum achievable utilization. It is also shown that dynamic priority policies produce significantly better results than fixed priority policies when task sets require high processor utilizations.","PeriodicalId":318810,"journal":{"name":"Proceeding. 10th EUROMICRO Workshop on Real-Time Systems (Cat. No.98EX168)","volume":"29 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1998-06-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"39","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Using exact feasibility tests for allocating real-time tasks in multiprocessor systems\",\"authors\":\"S. Sáez, Joan Vila i Carbó, A. Crespo\",\"doi\":\"10.1109/EMWRTS.1998.685068\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"The paper introduces improvements in partitioning schemes for multiprocessor real time systems which allow higher processor utilization and enhanced schedulability by using exact feasibility tests to evaluate the schedulability limit of a processor. The paper analyzes how to combine these tests with existing bin packing algorithms for processor allocation and provides new variants which are exhaustively evaluated using two assumptions: variable and fixed number of processors. The problem of evaluating these algorithms is complex, since metrics are usually based on comparing the performance of a given algorithm to an optimal one, but determining optimals is often NP hard on multiprocessors. This problem has been overcome by defining lower or upper bounds on the performance of an optimal algorithm and then defining metrics with respect these bounds. The evaluation has shown that the algorithms exhibit extremely good behavior and they can be considered very close to the maximum achievable utilization. It is also shown that dynamic priority policies produce significantly better results than fixed priority policies when task sets require high processor utilizations.\",\"PeriodicalId\":318810,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Proceeding. 10th EUROMICRO Workshop on Real-Time Systems (Cat. No.98EX168)\",\"volume\":\"29 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"1998-06-17\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"39\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Proceeding. 10th EUROMICRO Workshop on Real-Time Systems (Cat. No.98EX168)\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1109/EMWRTS.1998.685068\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Proceeding. 10th EUROMICRO Workshop on Real-Time Systems (Cat. No.98EX168)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/EMWRTS.1998.685068","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 39

摘要

本文介绍了多处理器实时系统分区方案的改进,通过精确的可行性测试来评估处理器的可调度性极限,从而提高了处理器的利用率和可调度性。本文分析了如何将这些测试与现有的处理器分配装箱算法相结合,并提供了新的变体,这些变体使用变量和固定数量的处理器两个假设进行了详尽的评估。评估这些算法的问题很复杂,因为指标通常是基于将给定算法的性能与最优算法进行比较,但在多处理器上确定最优算法通常是NP困难的。通过定义最优算法性能的下界或上界,然后根据这些边界定义度量,可以克服这个问题。评估表明,算法表现出非常好的性能,可以认为它们非常接近可实现的最大利用率。研究还表明,当任务集需要较高的处理器利用率时,动态优先级策略产生的结果明显优于固定优先级策略。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Using exact feasibility tests for allocating real-time tasks in multiprocessor systems
The paper introduces improvements in partitioning schemes for multiprocessor real time systems which allow higher processor utilization and enhanced schedulability by using exact feasibility tests to evaluate the schedulability limit of a processor. The paper analyzes how to combine these tests with existing bin packing algorithms for processor allocation and provides new variants which are exhaustively evaluated using two assumptions: variable and fixed number of processors. The problem of evaluating these algorithms is complex, since metrics are usually based on comparing the performance of a given algorithm to an optimal one, but determining optimals is often NP hard on multiprocessors. This problem has been overcome by defining lower or upper bounds on the performance of an optimal algorithm and then defining metrics with respect these bounds. The evaluation has shown that the algorithms exhibit extremely good behavior and they can be considered very close to the maximum achievable utilization. It is also shown that dynamic priority policies produce significantly better results than fixed priority policies when task sets require high processor utilizations.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信