RFP还是不RFP:这是一个问题

Melinda Stowe
{"title":"RFP还是不RFP:这是一个问题","authors":"Melinda Stowe","doi":"10.1300/J111V26N03_04","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Abstract There are several methodologies tor selecting an integrated library system: sole source. Request l'or Information (RFI), and Request for Proposal (RFP). for example. Some libraries are moving away from the latter, arguing that it is time-consuming, takes too many staff resources, includes more detail than is needed, and results in a final outcome lhal is no different than if the system was selected in a more streamlined fashion. This article argues that the benefits of the RFP greatly outweigh other approaches. It also explores the University of Rochester's adoption of the RFP methodology and highlights successes with the model as well as aspects that could be strengthened.","PeriodicalId":127084,"journal":{"name":"Information Technology Planning","volume":"33 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1999-01-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"3","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"To RFP or Not to RFP: That is the Question\",\"authors\":\"Melinda Stowe\",\"doi\":\"10.1300/J111V26N03_04\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Abstract There are several methodologies tor selecting an integrated library system: sole source. Request l'or Information (RFI), and Request for Proposal (RFP). for example. Some libraries are moving away from the latter, arguing that it is time-consuming, takes too many staff resources, includes more detail than is needed, and results in a final outcome lhal is no different than if the system was selected in a more streamlined fashion. This article argues that the benefits of the RFP greatly outweigh other approaches. It also explores the University of Rochester's adoption of the RFP methodology and highlights successes with the model as well as aspects that could be strengthened.\",\"PeriodicalId\":127084,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Information Technology Planning\",\"volume\":\"33 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"1999-01-25\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"3\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Information Technology Planning\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1300/J111V26N03_04\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Information Technology Planning","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1300/J111V26N03_04","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 3

摘要

选择综合图书馆系统有几种方法:单一来源。请求信息(RFI)和请求建议(RFP)。为例。一些图书馆正在放弃后者,认为后者耗时,需要太多的人力资源,包含的细节比需要的更多,并且最终结果与以更精简的方式选择系统没有什么不同。本文认为RFP的好处远远超过其他方法。它还探讨了罗切斯特大学对RFP方法的采用,并强调了该模型的成功以及可以加强的方面。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
To RFP or Not to RFP: That is the Question
Abstract There are several methodologies tor selecting an integrated library system: sole source. Request l'or Information (RFI), and Request for Proposal (RFP). for example. Some libraries are moving away from the latter, arguing that it is time-consuming, takes too many staff resources, includes more detail than is needed, and results in a final outcome lhal is no different than if the system was selected in a more streamlined fashion. This article argues that the benefits of the RFP greatly outweigh other approaches. It also explores the University of Rochester's adoption of the RFP methodology and highlights successes with the model as well as aspects that could be strengthened.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信