什么使测试工作:软件开发团队的九个案例研究

Chistopher David Thomson, M. Holcombe, A. Simons
{"title":"什么使测试工作:软件开发团队的九个案例研究","authors":"Chistopher David Thomson, M. Holcombe, A. Simons","doi":"10.1109/TAICPART.2009.12","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Recently there has been a focus on test first and test driven development; several empirical studies have tried to assess the advantage that these methods give over testing after development. The results have been mixed. In this paper we investigate nine teams who tested during coding to examine the effect it had on the external quality of their code. Of the top three performing teams two used a documented testing strategy and the other an ad-hoc approach to testing. We conclude that their success appears to be related to a testing culture where the teams proactively test rather than carry out only what is required in a mechanical fashion.","PeriodicalId":339626,"journal":{"name":"2009 Testing: Academic and Industrial Conference - Practice and Research Techniques","volume":"140 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2009-09-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"3","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"What Makes Testing Work: Nine Case Studies of Software Development Teams\",\"authors\":\"Chistopher David Thomson, M. Holcombe, A. Simons\",\"doi\":\"10.1109/TAICPART.2009.12\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Recently there has been a focus on test first and test driven development; several empirical studies have tried to assess the advantage that these methods give over testing after development. The results have been mixed. In this paper we investigate nine teams who tested during coding to examine the effect it had on the external quality of their code. Of the top three performing teams two used a documented testing strategy and the other an ad-hoc approach to testing. We conclude that their success appears to be related to a testing culture where the teams proactively test rather than carry out only what is required in a mechanical fashion.\",\"PeriodicalId\":339626,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"2009 Testing: Academic and Industrial Conference - Practice and Research Techniques\",\"volume\":\"140 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2009-09-04\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"3\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"2009 Testing: Academic and Industrial Conference - Practice and Research Techniques\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1109/TAICPART.2009.12\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"2009 Testing: Academic and Industrial Conference - Practice and Research Techniques","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/TAICPART.2009.12","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 3

摘要

最近出现了测试优先和测试驱动开发的焦点;一些实证研究试图评估这些方法相对于开发后测试的优势。结果喜忧参半。在本文中,我们调查了九个在编码过程中进行测试的团队,以检查它对其代码的外部质量的影响。在表现最好的三个团队中,两个使用了文档化的测试策略,另一个使用了特别的测试方法。我们得出结论,他们的成功似乎与测试文化有关,在这种文化中,团队主动进行测试,而不是以机械的方式只执行所需的内容。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
What Makes Testing Work: Nine Case Studies of Software Development Teams
Recently there has been a focus on test first and test driven development; several empirical studies have tried to assess the advantage that these methods give over testing after development. The results have been mixed. In this paper we investigate nine teams who tested during coding to examine the effect it had on the external quality of their code. Of the top three performing teams two used a documented testing strategy and the other an ad-hoc approach to testing. We conclude that their success appears to be related to a testing culture where the teams proactively test rather than carry out only what is required in a mechanical fashion.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信