18F-FDG PET或PET- ct在多发性骨髓瘤中的诊断性能:系统回顾和meta分析

Xue Liu, Jia Liang, Jun-hong Li, Qi-Lian Ran, Liang-Sen Liu, Li Jiang, Jianxiong Long, Yue-Ming Jiang, Zhixiao Wei
{"title":"18F-FDG PET或PET- ct在多发性骨髓瘤中的诊断性能:系统回顾和meta分析","authors":"Xue Liu, Jia Liang, Jun-hong Li, Qi-Lian Ran, Liang-Sen Liu, Li Jiang, Jianxiong Long, Yue-Ming Jiang, Zhixiao Wei","doi":"10.4172/2155-9619.1000283","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Objectives: Conduct a systematic review and meta-analysis to assess the diagnostic performance of 18Ffluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography (18F-FDG PET) or PET-computed tomography (PET-CT) in multiple myeloma (MM). Methods: A comprehensive literature search about studies that published till July 2015 was performed. Methodological quality of each study was assessed. The meta-regression and subgroup analysis was applied to assess the heterogeneity of between-study. A meta-analysis was used to state sensitivity, specificity, diagnostic odds ratio (DOR), area under the curve (AUC), summary receiver operating characteristic (SROC) curve and Ca* indexes with statistical software. Results: Eleven studies met the inclusion criteria in this meta-analysis, which comprise a total of 492 patients. The pooled sensitivity and specificity of 18F-FDG PET or PET-CT in multiple myeloma were 0.870 (95% CI, 0.825-0.907), 0.937 (95% CI, 0.892-0.967), and the AUC and the Ca* index were 0.9332, 0.869, respectively. The pooled sensitivity and specificity of PET in multiple myeloma were 0.94495% CI, 0.887-0.977) and 0.990 (95% CI, 0.947-1.000), and the AUC and the Ca* index were 0.98, 0.95, respectively. The pooled sensitivity and specificity for PET-CT in multiple myeloma were 0.813 (95% CI, 0.743-0.870) and 0.875 (95% CI, 0.787-0.936), and the AUC and the Ca* index were 0.88, 0.82, respectively. The funnel plots suggested the publication bias may exist. Conclusions: The whole-body 18F-FDG PET or PET-CT were imaging methods with high accuracy in differential diagnosis of multiple myeloma patients.","PeriodicalId":302578,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Nuclear Medicine and Radiation Therapy","volume":"29 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2016-03-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"2","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Diagnostic Performance of 18F-FDG PET or PET-CT in Multiple Myeloma: ASystematic Review and Meta-analysis\",\"authors\":\"Xue Liu, Jia Liang, Jun-hong Li, Qi-Lian Ran, Liang-Sen Liu, Li Jiang, Jianxiong Long, Yue-Ming Jiang, Zhixiao Wei\",\"doi\":\"10.4172/2155-9619.1000283\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Objectives: Conduct a systematic review and meta-analysis to assess the diagnostic performance of 18Ffluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography (18F-FDG PET) or PET-computed tomography (PET-CT) in multiple myeloma (MM). Methods: A comprehensive literature search about studies that published till July 2015 was performed. Methodological quality of each study was assessed. The meta-regression and subgroup analysis was applied to assess the heterogeneity of between-study. A meta-analysis was used to state sensitivity, specificity, diagnostic odds ratio (DOR), area under the curve (AUC), summary receiver operating characteristic (SROC) curve and Ca* indexes with statistical software. Results: Eleven studies met the inclusion criteria in this meta-analysis, which comprise a total of 492 patients. The pooled sensitivity and specificity of 18F-FDG PET or PET-CT in multiple myeloma were 0.870 (95% CI, 0.825-0.907), 0.937 (95% CI, 0.892-0.967), and the AUC and the Ca* index were 0.9332, 0.869, respectively. The pooled sensitivity and specificity of PET in multiple myeloma were 0.94495% CI, 0.887-0.977) and 0.990 (95% CI, 0.947-1.000), and the AUC and the Ca* index were 0.98, 0.95, respectively. The pooled sensitivity and specificity for PET-CT in multiple myeloma were 0.813 (95% CI, 0.743-0.870) and 0.875 (95% CI, 0.787-0.936), and the AUC and the Ca* index were 0.88, 0.82, respectively. The funnel plots suggested the publication bias may exist. Conclusions: The whole-body 18F-FDG PET or PET-CT were imaging methods with high accuracy in differential diagnosis of multiple myeloma patients.\",\"PeriodicalId\":302578,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Nuclear Medicine and Radiation Therapy\",\"volume\":\"29 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2016-03-05\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"2\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Nuclear Medicine and Radiation Therapy\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.4172/2155-9619.1000283\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Nuclear Medicine and Radiation Therapy","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4172/2155-9619.1000283","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

摘要

目的:通过系统回顾和荟萃分析,评估18氟脱氧葡萄糖正电子发射断层扫描(18F-FDG PET)或PET计算机断层扫描(PET- ct)对多发性骨髓瘤(MM)的诊断效果。方法:对截至2015年7月已发表的文献进行综合检索。评估每项研究的方法学质量。采用meta回归和亚组分析评估研究间异质性。采用meta分析方法,应用统计软件对敏感性、特异性、诊断优势比(DOR)、曲线下面积(AUC)、总受试者工作特征(SROC)曲线及Ca*指标进行meta分析。结果:11项研究符合本荟萃分析的纳入标准,共包括492例患者。18F-FDG PET或PET- ct对多发性骨髓瘤的敏感性和特异性分别为0.870 (95% CI, 0.825-0.907)、0.937 (95% CI, 0.892-0.967), AUC和Ca*指数分别为0.9332、0.869。PET对多发性骨髓瘤的综合敏感性和特异性分别为0.94495% CI(0.887 ~ 0.977)和0.990 (95% CI, 0.947 ~ 1.000), AUC和Ca*指数分别为0.98、0.95。PET-CT对多发性骨髓瘤的敏感性和特异性分别为0.813 (95% CI, 0.743-0.870)和0.875 (95% CI, 0.787-0.936), AUC和Ca*指数分别为0.88、0.82。漏斗图显示可能存在发表偏倚。结论:全身18F-FDG PET或PET- ct是鉴别多发性骨髓瘤患者准确率较高的影像学方法。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Diagnostic Performance of 18F-FDG PET or PET-CT in Multiple Myeloma: ASystematic Review and Meta-analysis
Objectives: Conduct a systematic review and meta-analysis to assess the diagnostic performance of 18Ffluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography (18F-FDG PET) or PET-computed tomography (PET-CT) in multiple myeloma (MM). Methods: A comprehensive literature search about studies that published till July 2015 was performed. Methodological quality of each study was assessed. The meta-regression and subgroup analysis was applied to assess the heterogeneity of between-study. A meta-analysis was used to state sensitivity, specificity, diagnostic odds ratio (DOR), area under the curve (AUC), summary receiver operating characteristic (SROC) curve and Ca* indexes with statistical software. Results: Eleven studies met the inclusion criteria in this meta-analysis, which comprise a total of 492 patients. The pooled sensitivity and specificity of 18F-FDG PET or PET-CT in multiple myeloma were 0.870 (95% CI, 0.825-0.907), 0.937 (95% CI, 0.892-0.967), and the AUC and the Ca* index were 0.9332, 0.869, respectively. The pooled sensitivity and specificity of PET in multiple myeloma were 0.94495% CI, 0.887-0.977) and 0.990 (95% CI, 0.947-1.000), and the AUC and the Ca* index were 0.98, 0.95, respectively. The pooled sensitivity and specificity for PET-CT in multiple myeloma were 0.813 (95% CI, 0.743-0.870) and 0.875 (95% CI, 0.787-0.936), and the AUC and the Ca* index were 0.88, 0.82, respectively. The funnel plots suggested the publication bias may exist. Conclusions: The whole-body 18F-FDG PET or PET-CT were imaging methods with high accuracy in differential diagnosis of multiple myeloma patients.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信