{"title":"\"当一个人拒绝服从征服任务的命令就会被流放\"","authors":"Bénédicte Ledent","doi":"10.1163/9789004486423_014","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Caryl Phillips's later novels, from Higher Ground (1989) to Crossing the River (1993), have often been read in the context of what Paul Gilroy has called the Black Atlantic, as recreations of slave-trading in Africa, plantation life in the Americas, and exile in European metropolises. Described by one commentator as \"a vivid historian of slave experience,\" Phillips could even be called one of the major current chroniclers of this often silenced past, since \"behind all of [his fiction] looms the dark history of slavery and its consequences.\" For all its interest and relevance, however, this historicist approach has its own limitations. In the long run, it could indeed make us forget that Phillips's fiction, far from being exclusively concerned with elaborating a response to the wrongs of colonialism, among them slavery, aspires, like any self-respecting work of art, to express its own way of seeing the world: ie, its philosophy. Unsurprisingly, therefore, a few reviewers were mystified when in his latest novel, The Nature of Blood (1997), Phillips seemed to distance himself from what they regarded as his fictional territory, and dealt with the European roots of exclusion and tribalism, particularly the Jewish Holocaust (which, incidentally, he had already addressed in a collection of travel essays, The European Tribe [1987], and in the last section of Higher Ground). As if, by leaving the literary ghetto to which the sacred rules of authenticity would have confined him, Phillips had claimed a more direct say on the human condition at large, and had thereby committed literary trespass, an offence taken seriously by some mainstream critics. Such, at least, is the impression given in a review by Hilary Mantel, entitled \"Black is not Jewish,\" where she objects to what she views as Phillips's inadequate tackling of the Jewish Holocaust:","PeriodicalId":129090,"journal":{"name":"Missions of Interdependence","volume":"293 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2002-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"“One is exiled when one refuses to obey the commandments of Conquest Mission”\",\"authors\":\"Bénédicte Ledent\",\"doi\":\"10.1163/9789004486423_014\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Caryl Phillips's later novels, from Higher Ground (1989) to Crossing the River (1993), have often been read in the context of what Paul Gilroy has called the Black Atlantic, as recreations of slave-trading in Africa, plantation life in the Americas, and exile in European metropolises. Described by one commentator as \\\"a vivid historian of slave experience,\\\" Phillips could even be called one of the major current chroniclers of this often silenced past, since \\\"behind all of [his fiction] looms the dark history of slavery and its consequences.\\\" For all its interest and relevance, however, this historicist approach has its own limitations. In the long run, it could indeed make us forget that Phillips's fiction, far from being exclusively concerned with elaborating a response to the wrongs of colonialism, among them slavery, aspires, like any self-respecting work of art, to express its own way of seeing the world: ie, its philosophy. Unsurprisingly, therefore, a few reviewers were mystified when in his latest novel, The Nature of Blood (1997), Phillips seemed to distance himself from what they regarded as his fictional territory, and dealt with the European roots of exclusion and tribalism, particularly the Jewish Holocaust (which, incidentally, he had already addressed in a collection of travel essays, The European Tribe [1987], and in the last section of Higher Ground). As if, by leaving the literary ghetto to which the sacred rules of authenticity would have confined him, Phillips had claimed a more direct say on the human condition at large, and had thereby committed literary trespass, an offence taken seriously by some mainstream critics. Such, at least, is the impression given in a review by Hilary Mantel, entitled \\\"Black is not Jewish,\\\" where she objects to what she views as Phillips's inadequate tackling of the Jewish Holocaust:\",\"PeriodicalId\":129090,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Missions of Interdependence\",\"volume\":\"293 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2002-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"1\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Missions of Interdependence\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1163/9789004486423_014\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Missions of Interdependence","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1163/9789004486423_014","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1
摘要
卡里尔·菲利普斯(Caryl Phillips)的后期小说,从《高地》(1989)到《过河》(1993),经常被置于保罗·吉尔罗伊(Paul Gilroy)所称的“黑色大西洋”的背景下,作为对非洲奴隶贸易、美洲种植园生活和欧洲大都市流亡生活的再现。一位评论家将菲利普斯描述为“一位生动的奴隶经历历史学家”,他甚至可以被称为这段常常被沉默的过去的主要编年史家之一,因为“(他的所有小说)背后都隐藏着奴隶制及其后果的黑暗历史。”然而,尽管这种历史主义方法很有趣,也很有意义,但它也有其局限性。从长远来看,它确实会让我们忘记,菲利普斯的小说,远非仅仅关注于阐述对殖民主义(其中包括奴隶制)的错误的回应,而是像任何有自尊的艺术作品一样,渴望表达自己看待世界的方式:即它的哲学。因此,毫不奇怪,当菲利普斯在他的最新小说《血的本质》(1997)中似乎与他们所认为的虚构领域保持距离,并处理欧洲排外和部落主义的根源时,一些评论家感到困惑,特别是犹太人大屠杀(顺便说一下,他已经在旅行随笔集《欧洲部落》[1987]和《高地》的最后一部分中谈到了这一点)。仿佛,通过离开被真实性的神圣规则所限制的文学贫民区,菲利普斯对整个人类状况有了更直接的话语权,从而犯下了文学上的侵权行为,这是一些主流评论家严肃对待的罪行。至少,这是希拉里·曼特尔(Hilary Mantel)在一篇题为《黑人不是犹太人》(Black is not Jewish)的评论中给人的印象,她在文中反对菲利普斯对犹太人大屠杀处理不当:
“One is exiled when one refuses to obey the commandments of Conquest Mission”
Caryl Phillips's later novels, from Higher Ground (1989) to Crossing the River (1993), have often been read in the context of what Paul Gilroy has called the Black Atlantic, as recreations of slave-trading in Africa, plantation life in the Americas, and exile in European metropolises. Described by one commentator as "a vivid historian of slave experience," Phillips could even be called one of the major current chroniclers of this often silenced past, since "behind all of [his fiction] looms the dark history of slavery and its consequences." For all its interest and relevance, however, this historicist approach has its own limitations. In the long run, it could indeed make us forget that Phillips's fiction, far from being exclusively concerned with elaborating a response to the wrongs of colonialism, among them slavery, aspires, like any self-respecting work of art, to express its own way of seeing the world: ie, its philosophy. Unsurprisingly, therefore, a few reviewers were mystified when in his latest novel, The Nature of Blood (1997), Phillips seemed to distance himself from what they regarded as his fictional territory, and dealt with the European roots of exclusion and tribalism, particularly the Jewish Holocaust (which, incidentally, he had already addressed in a collection of travel essays, The European Tribe [1987], and in the last section of Higher Ground). As if, by leaving the literary ghetto to which the sacred rules of authenticity would have confined him, Phillips had claimed a more direct say on the human condition at large, and had thereby committed literary trespass, an offence taken seriously by some mainstream critics. Such, at least, is the impression given in a review by Hilary Mantel, entitled "Black is not Jewish," where she objects to what she views as Phillips's inadequate tackling of the Jewish Holocaust: