克服印尼数字经济跨国企业基础侵蚀和利润转移的法律制定

Russel Butarbutar
{"title":"克服印尼数字经济跨国企业基础侵蚀和利润转移的法律制定","authors":"Russel Butarbutar","doi":"10.22304/pjih.v9n3.a2","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This study discusses Indonesian legal strategies and formulations to handle tax avoidance originating from Base Erosion Profit Shifting (BEPS) carried out by the digital-economy multinational enterprise. It is a normative (doctrinal) study supported by non-doctrinal methods to reveal the truth based on the logic of legal scholarship. It also compared the practices to the tax provisions, legislation, and cases in India, the United Kingdom, Australia, and Malaysia. At least two theories underlie the study. The first is the legal theory of justice, certainty, and expediency from Gustav Radbruch. The second is the theory of international cooperation. The study found several points. First, multinational enterprise strategies avoid tax by means of Permanent Establishment techniques in low-tax jurisdictions, transfer pricing, and tax treaty shopping. Second, to tackle the multinational enterprise that conducts BEPS in the field of the digital economy, (1) all countries have developed and amended laws and regulations related to e-commerce taxation and the digital economy; and (2) all countries carry out international cooperation, both bilaterally and multilaterally through tax treaties, MLI, and CbC reporting.","PeriodicalId":404335,"journal":{"name":"PADJADJARAN Jurnal Ilmu Hukum (Journal of Law)","volume":"41 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1900-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Legal Formulation to Overcome Base-Erosion and Profit-Shifting Practices of Digital-Economy Multinational Enterprise in Indonesia\",\"authors\":\"Russel Butarbutar\",\"doi\":\"10.22304/pjih.v9n3.a2\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"This study discusses Indonesian legal strategies and formulations to handle tax avoidance originating from Base Erosion Profit Shifting (BEPS) carried out by the digital-economy multinational enterprise. It is a normative (doctrinal) study supported by non-doctrinal methods to reveal the truth based on the logic of legal scholarship. It also compared the practices to the tax provisions, legislation, and cases in India, the United Kingdom, Australia, and Malaysia. At least two theories underlie the study. The first is the legal theory of justice, certainty, and expediency from Gustav Radbruch. The second is the theory of international cooperation. The study found several points. First, multinational enterprise strategies avoid tax by means of Permanent Establishment techniques in low-tax jurisdictions, transfer pricing, and tax treaty shopping. Second, to tackle the multinational enterprise that conducts BEPS in the field of the digital economy, (1) all countries have developed and amended laws and regulations related to e-commerce taxation and the digital economy; and (2) all countries carry out international cooperation, both bilaterally and multilaterally through tax treaties, MLI, and CbC reporting.\",\"PeriodicalId\":404335,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"PADJADJARAN Jurnal Ilmu Hukum (Journal of Law)\",\"volume\":\"41 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"1900-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"PADJADJARAN Jurnal Ilmu Hukum (Journal of Law)\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.22304/pjih.v9n3.a2\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"PADJADJARAN Jurnal Ilmu Hukum (Journal of Law)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.22304/pjih.v9n3.a2","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

本研究探讨了印尼处理数字经济跨国企业因税基侵蚀利润转移(BEPS)而产生的避税的法律策略和制定。它是以法学的逻辑为基础,以非理论的方法为支撑,揭示真理的规范性(理论)研究。它还将这些做法与印度、英国、澳大利亚和马来西亚的税收规定、立法和案例进行了比较。至少有两种理论支撑着这项研究。首先是古斯塔夫·拉德布鲁赫关于正义、确定性和权宜之计的法律理论。二是国际合作理论。这项研究发现了几点。首先,跨国企业战略通过在低税收管辖区的常设机构技术、转让定价和税收协定购物来避税。第二,针对跨国企业在数字经济领域实施BEPS的问题,(1)各国都制定和修订了电子商务税收和数字经济相关的法律法规;(2)各国通过税收协定、MLI和CbC报告开展双边和多边的国际合作。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Legal Formulation to Overcome Base-Erosion and Profit-Shifting Practices of Digital-Economy Multinational Enterprise in Indonesia
This study discusses Indonesian legal strategies and formulations to handle tax avoidance originating from Base Erosion Profit Shifting (BEPS) carried out by the digital-economy multinational enterprise. It is a normative (doctrinal) study supported by non-doctrinal methods to reveal the truth based on the logic of legal scholarship. It also compared the practices to the tax provisions, legislation, and cases in India, the United Kingdom, Australia, and Malaysia. At least two theories underlie the study. The first is the legal theory of justice, certainty, and expediency from Gustav Radbruch. The second is the theory of international cooperation. The study found several points. First, multinational enterprise strategies avoid tax by means of Permanent Establishment techniques in low-tax jurisdictions, transfer pricing, and tax treaty shopping. Second, to tackle the multinational enterprise that conducts BEPS in the field of the digital economy, (1) all countries have developed and amended laws and regulations related to e-commerce taxation and the digital economy; and (2) all countries carry out international cooperation, both bilaterally and multilaterally through tax treaties, MLI, and CbC reporting.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信