柏拉图与怀特海的两极人格

Process Studies Pub Date : 2022-05-01 DOI:10.5406/21543682.51.1.07

D. Dombrowski

{"title":"柏拉图与怀特海的两极人格","authors":"D. Dombrowski","doi":"10.5406/21543682.51.1.07","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"\n It has often been noticed that Plato's metaphysical view of being is dipolar. The purpose of the present article is to detail what it means to say that being is dipolar in Plato. Further, I will explore the extent to which dipolarity in Whitehead is indebted to Plato and the extent to which Whitehead's dipolarity is different from Plato's. In this regard I will concentrate on Whitehead's recently published Harvard Lectures.","PeriodicalId":315123,"journal":{"name":"Process Studies","volume":"47 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-05-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The Dipolar Character of Being in Plato and Whitehead\",\"authors\":\"D. Dombrowski\",\"doi\":\"10.5406/21543682.51.1.07\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"\\n It has often been noticed that Plato's metaphysical view of being is dipolar. The purpose of the present article is to detail what it means to say that being is dipolar in Plato. Further, I will explore the extent to which dipolarity in Whitehead is indebted to Plato and the extent to which Whitehead's dipolarity is different from Plato's. In this regard I will concentrate on Whitehead's recently published Harvard Lectures.\",\"PeriodicalId\":315123,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Process Studies\",\"volume\":\"47 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-05-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"1\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Process Studies\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.5406/21543682.51.1.07\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Process Studies","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5406/21543682.51.1.07","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}

引用次数: 1

摘要

人们经常注意到，柏拉图的形而上学的存在观是偶极的。这篇文章的目的是详细说明柏拉图所说的存在是偶极的是什么意思。此外，我将探讨怀特海的双极性在多大程度上得益于柏拉图，以及怀特海的双极性在多大程度上不同于柏拉图。在这方面，我将重点介绍怀特海最近出版的《哈佛讲座》。

本文章由计算机程序翻译，如有差异，请以英文原文为准。

查看原文本刊更多论文

The Dipolar Character of Being in Plato and Whitehead

It has often been noticed that Plato's metaphysical view of being is dipolar. The purpose of the present article is to detail what it means to say that being is dipolar in Plato. Further, I will explore the extent to which dipolarity in Whitehead is indebted to Plato and the extent to which Whitehead's dipolarity is different from Plato's. In this regard I will concentrate on Whitehead's recently published Harvard Lectures.

求助全文

通过发布文献求助，成功后即可免费获取论文全文。去求助

来源期刊

Process Studies

自引率

0.00%

发文量