100mw聚光太阳能电站与光伏电站的对比分析

A. Awan
{"title":"100mw聚光太阳能电站与光伏电站的对比分析","authors":"A. Awan","doi":"10.1063/1.5115363","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Solar energy can be exploited to produce electrical energy by two main methods; one by using photovoltaic (PV) panels to directly convert the sun’s light into electrical energy and the other by using thermodynamic cycle with the help of concentrated solar power (CSP) approach to convert the heat of the sun into electricity. The objective of this research paper is to design, analyze and compare the performance of a 100 MW CSP and PV plants in the Gwadar city in the southwest coast of Baluchistan, Pakistan. Both technical and economic analyses are performed. The economic comparative analysis includes the levelised cost of energy (LCOE), net present value (NPV) and payback period while the technical comparison is based on electrical output and capacity factor. The annual electrical output of the CSP plant is 327804 MWh as compared to 227389.2 MWh from PV plant. The capacity factors of CSP and PV plant are 37.5 % and 26 % respectively. The LCOE, NPV and payback period of CSP plant are 15.02 ¢/kWh, -121,050,688 US$ and 18.5 years, respectively while LCOE, NPV and payback period of PV plant are 5.43 ¢/kWh, 134,040,640 US$ and 5.5 years respectively. The CSP plant has better technical performance as compared to PV plant but PV plant has better economic performance.Solar energy can be exploited to produce electrical energy by two main methods; one by using photovoltaic (PV) panels to directly convert the sun’s light into electrical energy and the other by using thermodynamic cycle with the help of concentrated solar power (CSP) approach to convert the heat of the sun into electricity. The objective of this research paper is to design, analyze and compare the performance of a 100 MW CSP and PV plants in the Gwadar city in the southwest coast of Baluchistan, Pakistan. Both technical and economic analyses are performed. The economic comparative analysis includes the levelised cost of energy (LCOE), net present value (NPV) and payback period while the technical comparison is based on electrical output and capacity factor. The annual electrical output of the CSP plant is 327804 MWh as compared to 227389.2 MWh from PV plant. The capacity factors of CSP and PV plant are 37.5 % and 26 % respectively. The LCOE, NPV and payback period of CSP plant are 15.02 ¢/kWh, -121,050,68...","PeriodicalId":294515,"journal":{"name":"5TH INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON ENERGY, ENVIRONMENT AND SUSTAINABLE DEVELOPMENT (EESD-2018)","volume":"17 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-07-11","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"4","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Comparative analysis of 100 MW concentrated solar power plant and photovoltaic plant\",\"authors\":\"A. Awan\",\"doi\":\"10.1063/1.5115363\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Solar energy can be exploited to produce electrical energy by two main methods; one by using photovoltaic (PV) panels to directly convert the sun’s light into electrical energy and the other by using thermodynamic cycle with the help of concentrated solar power (CSP) approach to convert the heat of the sun into electricity. The objective of this research paper is to design, analyze and compare the performance of a 100 MW CSP and PV plants in the Gwadar city in the southwest coast of Baluchistan, Pakistan. Both technical and economic analyses are performed. The economic comparative analysis includes the levelised cost of energy (LCOE), net present value (NPV) and payback period while the technical comparison is based on electrical output and capacity factor. The annual electrical output of the CSP plant is 327804 MWh as compared to 227389.2 MWh from PV plant. The capacity factors of CSP and PV plant are 37.5 % and 26 % respectively. The LCOE, NPV and payback period of CSP plant are 15.02 ¢/kWh, -121,050,688 US$ and 18.5 years, respectively while LCOE, NPV and payback period of PV plant are 5.43 ¢/kWh, 134,040,640 US$ and 5.5 years respectively. The CSP plant has better technical performance as compared to PV plant but PV plant has better economic performance.Solar energy can be exploited to produce electrical energy by two main methods; one by using photovoltaic (PV) panels to directly convert the sun’s light into electrical energy and the other by using thermodynamic cycle with the help of concentrated solar power (CSP) approach to convert the heat of the sun into electricity. The objective of this research paper is to design, analyze and compare the performance of a 100 MW CSP and PV plants in the Gwadar city in the southwest coast of Baluchistan, Pakistan. Both technical and economic analyses are performed. The economic comparative analysis includes the levelised cost of energy (LCOE), net present value (NPV) and payback period while the technical comparison is based on electrical output and capacity factor. The annual electrical output of the CSP plant is 327804 MWh as compared to 227389.2 MWh from PV plant. The capacity factors of CSP and PV plant are 37.5 % and 26 % respectively. The LCOE, NPV and payback period of CSP plant are 15.02 ¢/kWh, -121,050,68...\",\"PeriodicalId\":294515,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"5TH INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON ENERGY, ENVIRONMENT AND SUSTAINABLE DEVELOPMENT (EESD-2018)\",\"volume\":\"17 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2019-07-11\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"4\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"5TH INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON ENERGY, ENVIRONMENT AND SUSTAINABLE DEVELOPMENT (EESD-2018)\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1063/1.5115363\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"5TH INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON ENERGY, ENVIRONMENT AND SUSTAINABLE DEVELOPMENT (EESD-2018)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1063/1.5115363","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 4

摘要

利用太阳能产生电能主要有两种方法;一种是利用光伏(PV)板直接将太阳的光能转化为电能,另一种是利用热力循环借助聚光太阳能(CSP)的方式将太阳的热能转化为电能。本研究论文的目的是设计,分析和比较巴基斯坦俾路支省西南海岸瓜达尔市100兆瓦CSP和光伏电站的性能。进行了技术和经济分析。经济比较分析包括平准化能源成本(LCOE)、净现值(NPV)和投资回收期,而技术比较基于电力输出和容量系数。CSP电站的年发电量为327804兆瓦时,而光伏电站的年发电量为227389.2兆瓦时。光热发电和光伏发电的容量系数分别为37.5%和26%。光热电站的LCOE、净现值和投资回收期分别为15.02美分/千瓦时、-121,050,688美元和18.5年,光伏电站的LCOE、净现值和投资回收期分别为5.43美分/千瓦时、134,040,640美元和5.5年。与光伏电站相比,光热电站具有更好的技术性能,而光伏电站具有更好的经济性能。利用太阳能产生电能主要有两种方法;一种是利用光伏(PV)板直接将太阳的光能转化为电能,另一种是利用热力循环借助聚光太阳能(CSP)的方式将太阳的热能转化为电能。本研究论文的目的是设计,分析和比较巴基斯坦俾路支省西南海岸瓜达尔市100兆瓦CSP和光伏电站的性能。进行了技术和经济分析。经济比较分析包括平准化能源成本(LCOE)、净现值(NPV)和投资回收期,而技术比较基于电力输出和容量系数。CSP电站的年发电量为327804兆瓦时,而光伏电站的年发电量为227389.2兆瓦时。光热发电和光伏发电的容量系数分别为37.5%和26%。光热电站的LCOE、净现值和投资回收期分别为15.02美分/千瓦时、-121,050美分、68美分/千瓦时。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Comparative analysis of 100 MW concentrated solar power plant and photovoltaic plant
Solar energy can be exploited to produce electrical energy by two main methods; one by using photovoltaic (PV) panels to directly convert the sun’s light into electrical energy and the other by using thermodynamic cycle with the help of concentrated solar power (CSP) approach to convert the heat of the sun into electricity. The objective of this research paper is to design, analyze and compare the performance of a 100 MW CSP and PV plants in the Gwadar city in the southwest coast of Baluchistan, Pakistan. Both technical and economic analyses are performed. The economic comparative analysis includes the levelised cost of energy (LCOE), net present value (NPV) and payback period while the technical comparison is based on electrical output and capacity factor. The annual electrical output of the CSP plant is 327804 MWh as compared to 227389.2 MWh from PV plant. The capacity factors of CSP and PV plant are 37.5 % and 26 % respectively. The LCOE, NPV and payback period of CSP plant are 15.02 ¢/kWh, -121,050,688 US$ and 18.5 years, respectively while LCOE, NPV and payback period of PV plant are 5.43 ¢/kWh, 134,040,640 US$ and 5.5 years respectively. The CSP plant has better technical performance as compared to PV plant but PV plant has better economic performance.Solar energy can be exploited to produce electrical energy by two main methods; one by using photovoltaic (PV) panels to directly convert the sun’s light into electrical energy and the other by using thermodynamic cycle with the help of concentrated solar power (CSP) approach to convert the heat of the sun into electricity. The objective of this research paper is to design, analyze and compare the performance of a 100 MW CSP and PV plants in the Gwadar city in the southwest coast of Baluchistan, Pakistan. Both technical and economic analyses are performed. The economic comparative analysis includes the levelised cost of energy (LCOE), net present value (NPV) and payback period while the technical comparison is based on electrical output and capacity factor. The annual electrical output of the CSP plant is 327804 MWh as compared to 227389.2 MWh from PV plant. The capacity factors of CSP and PV plant are 37.5 % and 26 % respectively. The LCOE, NPV and payback period of CSP plant are 15.02 ¢/kWh, -121,050,68...
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信