南海争端仲裁庭裁决的环境法意义

I. Plakokefalos
{"title":"南海争端仲裁庭裁决的环境法意义","authors":"I. Plakokefalos","doi":"10.2139/SSRN.2880624","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Few disputes have attracted more controversy during the past few years than the South China Sea dispute. The new addition to the saga of the dispute is the award of an Arbitral Tribunal constituted under Annex VII of the United Nations Convention on the Law of the Sea on a case brought by the Philippines against the People’s Republic of China (PRC). The Philippines initiated proceedings against the PRC in early 2013 asking the Tribunal to decide on four categories of issues, as the Tribunal itself defined them. First, it asked for a decision on maritime rights and entitlements, second, on entitlements to maritime zones, third, on a number of actions taken up by the PRC in the South China Sea, and fourth, on the aggravation of the dispute on behalf of the PRC through a number of activities, including land reclamation and the construction of artificial islands. This chapter will not focus on the more publicized (and perhaps thornier) issues such as the PRC non-appearance in the proceedings, or the question of jurisdiction. It will rather focus on the environmental aspects of the award (covered by the third and fourth categories of complaints). The award contains extensive passages on issues of environmental protection worthy of analysis and contextualization. Therefore the aim of this chapter is twofold. On the one hand to analyse those environmental law aspects of the award as such. On the other hand, to place the environmental aspects of the award in the wider context of international environmental law (and in the context of the environmental issues in the South China Sea).","PeriodicalId":346805,"journal":{"name":"Natural Resources Law & Policy eJournal","volume":"26 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2016-12-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Environmental Law Aspects of the Arbitral Tribunal Award in the South China Sea Dispute\",\"authors\":\"I. Plakokefalos\",\"doi\":\"10.2139/SSRN.2880624\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Few disputes have attracted more controversy during the past few years than the South China Sea dispute. The new addition to the saga of the dispute is the award of an Arbitral Tribunal constituted under Annex VII of the United Nations Convention on the Law of the Sea on a case brought by the Philippines against the People’s Republic of China (PRC). The Philippines initiated proceedings against the PRC in early 2013 asking the Tribunal to decide on four categories of issues, as the Tribunal itself defined them. First, it asked for a decision on maritime rights and entitlements, second, on entitlements to maritime zones, third, on a number of actions taken up by the PRC in the South China Sea, and fourth, on the aggravation of the dispute on behalf of the PRC through a number of activities, including land reclamation and the construction of artificial islands. This chapter will not focus on the more publicized (and perhaps thornier) issues such as the PRC non-appearance in the proceedings, or the question of jurisdiction. It will rather focus on the environmental aspects of the award (covered by the third and fourth categories of complaints). The award contains extensive passages on issues of environmental protection worthy of analysis and contextualization. Therefore the aim of this chapter is twofold. On the one hand to analyse those environmental law aspects of the award as such. On the other hand, to place the environmental aspects of the award in the wider context of international environmental law (and in the context of the environmental issues in the South China Sea).\",\"PeriodicalId\":346805,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Natural Resources Law & Policy eJournal\",\"volume\":\"26 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2016-12-05\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"1\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Natural Resources Law & Policy eJournal\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.2139/SSRN.2880624\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Natural Resources Law & Policy eJournal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2139/SSRN.2880624","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

摘要

在过去几年中,没有什么争端比南中国海争端引起的争议更大。菲律宾对中华人民共和国提起的诉讼中,根据《联合国海洋法公约》附件七组成的一个仲裁法庭作出了裁决,这为这一争端的传奇增添了新的内容。菲律宾于2013年初对中国提起诉讼,要求仲裁庭就仲裁庭自己定义的四类问题作出裁决。第一,它要求就海洋权利和权利作出决定;第二,就海洋区域权利作出决定;第三,就中华人民共和国在南中国海采取的一些行动作出决定;第四,就中华人民共和国通过包括填海造地和建造人工岛屿在内的一系列活动加剧争端作出决定。本章将不关注更公开的(也许更棘手的)问题,如中华人民共和国不在诉讼程序中露面,或管辖权问题。它将侧重于奖励的环境方面(由第三和第四类投诉涵盖)。该奖项包含了大量值得分析和背景化的环境保护问题。因此,本章的目的是双重的。一方面分析那些环境法方面的奖项等。另一方面,将该裁决的环境方面置于国际环境法的更广泛背景下(以及在南中国海环境问题的背景下)。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Environmental Law Aspects of the Arbitral Tribunal Award in the South China Sea Dispute
Few disputes have attracted more controversy during the past few years than the South China Sea dispute. The new addition to the saga of the dispute is the award of an Arbitral Tribunal constituted under Annex VII of the United Nations Convention on the Law of the Sea on a case brought by the Philippines against the People’s Republic of China (PRC). The Philippines initiated proceedings against the PRC in early 2013 asking the Tribunal to decide on four categories of issues, as the Tribunal itself defined them. First, it asked for a decision on maritime rights and entitlements, second, on entitlements to maritime zones, third, on a number of actions taken up by the PRC in the South China Sea, and fourth, on the aggravation of the dispute on behalf of the PRC through a number of activities, including land reclamation and the construction of artificial islands. This chapter will not focus on the more publicized (and perhaps thornier) issues such as the PRC non-appearance in the proceedings, or the question of jurisdiction. It will rather focus on the environmental aspects of the award (covered by the third and fourth categories of complaints). The award contains extensive passages on issues of environmental protection worthy of analysis and contextualization. Therefore the aim of this chapter is twofold. On the one hand to analyse those environmental law aspects of the award as such. On the other hand, to place the environmental aspects of the award in the wider context of international environmental law (and in the context of the environmental issues in the South China Sea).
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信