对数字平台的监管是对澳大利亚失败的隐私法进行全经济改革的一部分(澳大利亚隐私基金会向澳大利亚政府提交的关于实施ACCC数字平台调查的最终报告)

G. Greenleaf, David Lindsay, B. Arnold, R. Clarke, K. Lane, Nigel Waters, Elizabeth Coombs
{"title":"对数字平台的监管是对澳大利亚失败的隐私法进行全经济改革的一部分(澳大利亚隐私基金会向澳大利亚政府提交的关于实施ACCC数字平台调查的最终报告)","authors":"G. Greenleaf, David Lindsay, B. Arnold, R. Clarke, K. Lane, Nigel Waters, Elizabeth Coombs","doi":"10.2139/ssrn.3443337","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This is the final submission to the Australian Government by the Australian Privacy Foundation (APF) on the final report of the Australian Consumer & Competition Commission (ACCC) Report on regulation of digital platforms.\r\n\r\nAPF welcomes the contribution made by the ACCC to improving the understanding of how the protection of privacy is central to addressing anti-competitive concerns and consumer protection in the data economy. APF's primary focus in this submission is on the consumer privacy aspects of the Inquiry, but with an eye to the issues of market power, and the trust that is fundamental for public administration in online environments. The APF strongly supports the ACCC's analysis and recommendations, across the board. ACCC’s analysis is consistent with a wide range of Australian and international official and private reports over the past three years, demonstrating that there is international recognition of a substantive problem that must be addressed. In particular, APF urges the Government’s adoption of the recommendations in Chapter 7 to achieve vital and substantial upgrades in Australia’s privacy protection, in order to address the major inroads into privacy because of the enormous growth in data surveillance by the private sector since 2000, the pressing need for a more powerful and much more effective Privacy Commissioner, and to achieve the privacy right of action previously recommended.\r\n\r\nFor reasons detailed in this Submission (and summarised at its end), APF expresses its strong support for the adoption by the Australian Government of all of the following Recommendations:\r\n\r\n16: Strengthen protections in the Privacy Act \r\n\r\n(a) Update ‘personal information’ definition \r\n\r\n(b) Strengthen notification requirements \r\n\r\n(c) Strengthen consent requirements and pro-consumer defaults \r\n\r\n(d) Enable the erasure of personal information \r\n\r\n(e) Introduce direct rights of action for individuals \r\n\r\n(f) Higher penalties for breach of the Privacy Act \r\n\r\n17: Broader reform of Australian privacy law, having regard to:\r\n\r\n1. Objectives\r\n\r\n2. Scope\r\n\r\n3. Higher standard of protections\r\n\r\n4. Inferred information\r\n\r\n5. De-identified information\r\n\r\n6. Overseas data flows\r\n\r\n7. Third-party certification\r\n\r\n18: OAIC privacy code for digital platforms, including but not limited to:\r\n\r\n1. Information requirements\r\n\r\n2. Consent requirements\r\n\r\n3. Opt-out controls\r\n\r\n4. Children’s data\r\n\r\n5. Information security\r\n\r\n6. Retention period\r\n\r\n7. Complaints-handling\r\n\r\n19: Statutory tort for serious invasions of privacy\r\n\r\n20: Prohibition against unfair contract terms \r\n\r\n21: Prohibition against certain unfair trading practices","PeriodicalId":308770,"journal":{"name":"LSN: Common Law Privacy Torts in Consumer Transactions (Sub-Topic)","volume":"45 11","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-09-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Regulation of Digital Platforms as Part of Economy-Wide Reforms to Australia's Failed Privacy Laws (Australian Privacy Foundation Submission to the Australian Government on Implementation of the ACCC's Digital Platforms Inquiry—Final Report)\",\"authors\":\"G. Greenleaf, David Lindsay, B. Arnold, R. Clarke, K. Lane, Nigel Waters, Elizabeth Coombs\",\"doi\":\"10.2139/ssrn.3443337\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"This is the final submission to the Australian Government by the Australian Privacy Foundation (APF) on the final report of the Australian Consumer & Competition Commission (ACCC) Report on regulation of digital platforms.\\r\\n\\r\\nAPF welcomes the contribution made by the ACCC to improving the understanding of how the protection of privacy is central to addressing anti-competitive concerns and consumer protection in the data economy. APF's primary focus in this submission is on the consumer privacy aspects of the Inquiry, but with an eye to the issues of market power, and the trust that is fundamental for public administration in online environments. The APF strongly supports the ACCC's analysis and recommendations, across the board. ACCC’s analysis is consistent with a wide range of Australian and international official and private reports over the past three years, demonstrating that there is international recognition of a substantive problem that must be addressed. In particular, APF urges the Government’s adoption of the recommendations in Chapter 7 to achieve vital and substantial upgrades in Australia’s privacy protection, in order to address the major inroads into privacy because of the enormous growth in data surveillance by the private sector since 2000, the pressing need for a more powerful and much more effective Privacy Commissioner, and to achieve the privacy right of action previously recommended.\\r\\n\\r\\nFor reasons detailed in this Submission (and summarised at its end), APF expresses its strong support for the adoption by the Australian Government of all of the following Recommendations:\\r\\n\\r\\n16: Strengthen protections in the Privacy Act \\r\\n\\r\\n(a) Update ‘personal information’ definition \\r\\n\\r\\n(b) Strengthen notification requirements \\r\\n\\r\\n(c) Strengthen consent requirements and pro-consumer defaults \\r\\n\\r\\n(d) Enable the erasure of personal information \\r\\n\\r\\n(e) Introduce direct rights of action for individuals \\r\\n\\r\\n(f) Higher penalties for breach of the Privacy Act \\r\\n\\r\\n17: Broader reform of Australian privacy law, having regard to:\\r\\n\\r\\n1. Objectives\\r\\n\\r\\n2. Scope\\r\\n\\r\\n3. Higher standard of protections\\r\\n\\r\\n4. Inferred information\\r\\n\\r\\n5. De-identified information\\r\\n\\r\\n6. Overseas data flows\\r\\n\\r\\n7. Third-party certification\\r\\n\\r\\n18: OAIC privacy code for digital platforms, including but not limited to:\\r\\n\\r\\n1. Information requirements\\r\\n\\r\\n2. Consent requirements\\r\\n\\r\\n3. Opt-out controls\\r\\n\\r\\n4. Children’s data\\r\\n\\r\\n5. Information security\\r\\n\\r\\n6. Retention period\\r\\n\\r\\n7. Complaints-handling\\r\\n\\r\\n19: Statutory tort for serious invasions of privacy\\r\\n\\r\\n20: Prohibition against unfair contract terms \\r\\n\\r\\n21: Prohibition against certain unfair trading practices\",\"PeriodicalId\":308770,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"LSN: Common Law Privacy Torts in Consumer Transactions (Sub-Topic)\",\"volume\":\"45 11\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2019-09-10\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"1\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"LSN: Common Law Privacy Torts in Consumer Transactions (Sub-Topic)\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3443337\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"LSN: Common Law Privacy Torts in Consumer Transactions (Sub-Topic)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3443337","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

摘要

这是澳大利亚隐私基金会(APF)就澳大利亚消费者与竞争委员会(ACCC)关于数字平台监管报告的最终报告向澳大利亚政府提交的最终报告。APF欢迎ACCC所做的贡献,以提高对隐私保护如何在数据经济中解决反竞争问题和消费者保护的核心理解。APF在提交的意见书中主要关注的是调查的消费者隐私方面,但也关注市场力量和信任问题,这是在线环境中公共行政的基础。APF强烈支持ACCC的分析和建议。ACCC的分析与过去三年澳大利亚和国际官方和私人报告的广泛一致,表明国际上认识到一个必须解决的实质性问题。APF特别敦促政府采纳第7章中的建议,以实现澳大利亚隐私保护的重要和实质性升级,以解决自2000年以来私营部门数据监控的巨大增长对隐私的重大侵犯,迫切需要一个更强大、更有效的隐私专员,并实现之前建议的隐私权行动。出于本意见书中详细说明的理由(并在结尾处作了总结),太平洋论坛表示强烈支持澳大利亚政府通过以下所有建议:加强《隐私法》中的保护(a)更新“个人信息”定义(b)加强通知要求(c)加强同意要求和有利于消费者的默认规定(d)允许删除个人信息(e)为个人引入直接诉讼权利(f)对违反《隐私法》17的行为处以更高的惩罚:对澳大利亚隐私法进行更广泛的改革,考虑到:1。Objectives2。Scope3。更高的保护标准。推断information5。消除识别信息information6。海外数据流。第三方认证18:数字平台的OAIC隐私代码,包括但不限于:1。requirements2信息。同意的期望。选择退出controls4。儿童data5。security6信息。保留period7。处理投诉19 .严重侵犯隐私的法定侵权行为20 .禁止不公平合同条款21 .禁止某些不公平交易行为
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Regulation of Digital Platforms as Part of Economy-Wide Reforms to Australia's Failed Privacy Laws (Australian Privacy Foundation Submission to the Australian Government on Implementation of the ACCC's Digital Platforms Inquiry—Final Report)
This is the final submission to the Australian Government by the Australian Privacy Foundation (APF) on the final report of the Australian Consumer & Competition Commission (ACCC) Report on regulation of digital platforms. APF welcomes the contribution made by the ACCC to improving the understanding of how the protection of privacy is central to addressing anti-competitive concerns and consumer protection in the data economy. APF's primary focus in this submission is on the consumer privacy aspects of the Inquiry, but with an eye to the issues of market power, and the trust that is fundamental for public administration in online environments. The APF strongly supports the ACCC's analysis and recommendations, across the board. ACCC’s analysis is consistent with a wide range of Australian and international official and private reports over the past three years, demonstrating that there is international recognition of a substantive problem that must be addressed. In particular, APF urges the Government’s adoption of the recommendations in Chapter 7 to achieve vital and substantial upgrades in Australia’s privacy protection, in order to address the major inroads into privacy because of the enormous growth in data surveillance by the private sector since 2000, the pressing need for a more powerful and much more effective Privacy Commissioner, and to achieve the privacy right of action previously recommended. For reasons detailed in this Submission (and summarised at its end), APF expresses its strong support for the adoption by the Australian Government of all of the following Recommendations: 16: Strengthen protections in the Privacy Act (a) Update ‘personal information’ definition (b) Strengthen notification requirements (c) Strengthen consent requirements and pro-consumer defaults (d) Enable the erasure of personal information (e) Introduce direct rights of action for individuals (f) Higher penalties for breach of the Privacy Act 17: Broader reform of Australian privacy law, having regard to: 1. Objectives 2. Scope 3. Higher standard of protections 4. Inferred information 5. De-identified information 6. Overseas data flows 7. Third-party certification 18: OAIC privacy code for digital platforms, including but not limited to: 1. Information requirements 2. Consent requirements 3. Opt-out controls 4. Children’s data 5. Information security 6. Retention period 7. Complaints-handling 19: Statutory tort for serious invasions of privacy 20: Prohibition against unfair contract terms 21: Prohibition against certain unfair trading practices
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信