基于ER-AHP的多属性决策方法

Zhang Hong-tao, Wang Hui, Sun Ke-lei, Wang Dong-peng
{"title":"基于ER-AHP的多属性决策方法","authors":"Zhang Hong-tao, Wang Hui, Sun Ke-lei, Wang Dong-peng","doi":"10.1109/ICMSE.2011.6069953","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"As a nascent method of multi-criteria decision-making with uncertainty, DS/AHP is similar to the analytic hierarchy process (AHP) in structure and its analytic processes are based on Dempster-Shafer (DS) theory. However, it is unsuitable to deal with the multi-attribute decision making with incomplete information, especially the attributes with missing values. In this paper, a new method for multiple-attribute decision making based on ER-AHP has been proposed, which incorporates the Evidential Reasoning(ER) algorithm with AHP. Firstly, each alternative is compared with the negative ideal alternative under an attribute to form the decision table by experts. Then a new basic probability assignment function (BPA) is constructed to express the incomplete information and some properties of the function are proved. After then, based on the results of aggregation which combines the attributes of each alternative by the ER algorithm, the alternatives are sorted and selected. Finally, the ER-AHP is compared with the DS / AHP through a numerical example.","PeriodicalId":280476,"journal":{"name":"2011 International Conference on Management Science & Engineering 18th Annual Conference Proceedings","volume":"300 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2011-11-07","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"3","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"A method for multi-attribute decision making based on ER-AHP\",\"authors\":\"Zhang Hong-tao, Wang Hui, Sun Ke-lei, Wang Dong-peng\",\"doi\":\"10.1109/ICMSE.2011.6069953\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"As a nascent method of multi-criteria decision-making with uncertainty, DS/AHP is similar to the analytic hierarchy process (AHP) in structure and its analytic processes are based on Dempster-Shafer (DS) theory. However, it is unsuitable to deal with the multi-attribute decision making with incomplete information, especially the attributes with missing values. In this paper, a new method for multiple-attribute decision making based on ER-AHP has been proposed, which incorporates the Evidential Reasoning(ER) algorithm with AHP. Firstly, each alternative is compared with the negative ideal alternative under an attribute to form the decision table by experts. Then a new basic probability assignment function (BPA) is constructed to express the incomplete information and some properties of the function are proved. After then, based on the results of aggregation which combines the attributes of each alternative by the ER algorithm, the alternatives are sorted and selected. Finally, the ER-AHP is compared with the DS / AHP through a numerical example.\",\"PeriodicalId\":280476,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"2011 International Conference on Management Science & Engineering 18th Annual Conference Proceedings\",\"volume\":\"300 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2011-11-07\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"3\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"2011 International Conference on Management Science & Engineering 18th Annual Conference Proceedings\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1109/ICMSE.2011.6069953\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"2011 International Conference on Management Science & Engineering 18th Annual Conference Proceedings","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/ICMSE.2011.6069953","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 3

摘要

作为一种新兴的具有不确定性的多准则决策方法,DS/AHP在结构上与层次分析法(AHP)相似,其分析过程基于Dempster-Shafer (DS)理论。但是,对于信息不完全的多属性决策,特别是属性值缺失的多属性决策,则不适用。将证据推理算法与层次分析法相结合,提出了一种基于ER-AHP的多属性决策方法。首先,将每个方案与某一属性下的负理想方案进行比较,形成专家决策表;然后构造了一个新的基本概率分配函数来表示不完全信息,并证明了该函数的一些性质。然后,根据ER算法对各备选方案的属性进行聚合的结果,对备选方案进行排序和选择。最后,通过数值算例对ER-AHP与DS / AHP进行了比较。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
A method for multi-attribute decision making based on ER-AHP
As a nascent method of multi-criteria decision-making with uncertainty, DS/AHP is similar to the analytic hierarchy process (AHP) in structure and its analytic processes are based on Dempster-Shafer (DS) theory. However, it is unsuitable to deal with the multi-attribute decision making with incomplete information, especially the attributes with missing values. In this paper, a new method for multiple-attribute decision making based on ER-AHP has been proposed, which incorporates the Evidential Reasoning(ER) algorithm with AHP. Firstly, each alternative is compared with the negative ideal alternative under an attribute to form the decision table by experts. Then a new basic probability assignment function (BPA) is constructed to express the incomplete information and some properties of the function are proved. After then, based on the results of aggregation which combines the attributes of each alternative by the ER algorithm, the alternatives are sorted and selected. Finally, the ER-AHP is compared with the DS / AHP through a numerical example.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信