O. Andriyevska, Natalia Dragan, B. Simoes, Jonathan I. Maletic
{"title":"基于架构重要性的UML类图布局评估","authors":"O. Andriyevska, Natalia Dragan, B. Simoes, Jonathan I. Maletic","doi":"10.1109/VISSOF.2005.1684296","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The paper presents and assesses a layout scheme for UML class diagrams that takes into account the architectural importance of a class in terms of its stereotype (e.g., boundary, control, entity). The design and running of a user study is described. The results of the study supports the hypothesis that layout based on architectural importance is more helpful in class diagram comprehension compared to layouts focusing primarily on aesthetics and/or abstract graph guidelines","PeriodicalId":103069,"journal":{"name":"3rd IEEE International Workshop on Visualizing Software for Understanding and Analysis","volume":"19 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2005-09-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"39","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Evaluating UML Class Diagram Layout based on Architectural Importance\",\"authors\":\"O. Andriyevska, Natalia Dragan, B. Simoes, Jonathan I. Maletic\",\"doi\":\"10.1109/VISSOF.2005.1684296\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"The paper presents and assesses a layout scheme for UML class diagrams that takes into account the architectural importance of a class in terms of its stereotype (e.g., boundary, control, entity). The design and running of a user study is described. The results of the study supports the hypothesis that layout based on architectural importance is more helpful in class diagram comprehension compared to layouts focusing primarily on aesthetics and/or abstract graph guidelines\",\"PeriodicalId\":103069,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"3rd IEEE International Workshop on Visualizing Software for Understanding and Analysis\",\"volume\":\"19 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2005-09-25\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"39\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"3rd IEEE International Workshop on Visualizing Software for Understanding and Analysis\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1109/VISSOF.2005.1684296\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"3rd IEEE International Workshop on Visualizing Software for Understanding and Analysis","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/VISSOF.2005.1684296","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
Evaluating UML Class Diagram Layout based on Architectural Importance
The paper presents and assesses a layout scheme for UML class diagrams that takes into account the architectural importance of a class in terms of its stereotype (e.g., boundary, control, entity). The design and running of a user study is described. The results of the study supports the hypothesis that layout based on architectural importance is more helpful in class diagram comprehension compared to layouts focusing primarily on aesthetics and/or abstract graph guidelines