用实验数据评价ECGI拼接法在窦性心律中的应用

Oumayma Bouhamama, L. Weynans, L. Bear
{"title":"用实验数据评价ECGI拼接法在窦性心律中的应用","authors":"Oumayma Bouhamama, L. Weynans, L. Bear","doi":"10.23919/cinc53138.2021.9662809","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Torso surface and ventricular epicardial potentials were recorded simultaneously in anesthetized, closed-chest pigs $(n=5)$ during sinus rhythm. Activation times were estimated from recorded torso potentials using three classical ECGI methods and a new method called the Patchwork Method (PM), which locally selects the optimal ECGI method and has demonstrated its efficiency with simulated data. The aim of this study was to evaluate the Patchwork method using experimental data in sinus rhythm. By comparing the classic ECGI reconstructions to recorded epicardial activation mapping, several inaccuracies in the ECGI maps are highlighted in this study. This involved inaccuracies in reconstructing activating maps, locating breakthrough sites and the production of artificial lines of block. However, the PM overcomes these restrictions, demonstrating its abilities to accurately reconstruct activation maps $(CC=0.90\\ \\ [0.86;0.92]$ and $RE=0.20$ [0.19; 0.24]) and localize epicardial breakthrough sites $(LE=17.16\\ \\ [8.87;22.14])$. Furthermore, it reduced the frequency of artificial lines of block (2 of 5 pig hearts).","PeriodicalId":126746,"journal":{"name":"2021 Computing in Cardiology (CinC)","volume":"31 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-09-13","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Evaluation of the ECGI Patchwork Method Using Experimental Data in Sinus Rhythm\",\"authors\":\"Oumayma Bouhamama, L. Weynans, L. Bear\",\"doi\":\"10.23919/cinc53138.2021.9662809\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Torso surface and ventricular epicardial potentials were recorded simultaneously in anesthetized, closed-chest pigs $(n=5)$ during sinus rhythm. Activation times were estimated from recorded torso potentials using three classical ECGI methods and a new method called the Patchwork Method (PM), which locally selects the optimal ECGI method and has demonstrated its efficiency with simulated data. The aim of this study was to evaluate the Patchwork method using experimental data in sinus rhythm. By comparing the classic ECGI reconstructions to recorded epicardial activation mapping, several inaccuracies in the ECGI maps are highlighted in this study. This involved inaccuracies in reconstructing activating maps, locating breakthrough sites and the production of artificial lines of block. However, the PM overcomes these restrictions, demonstrating its abilities to accurately reconstruct activation maps $(CC=0.90\\\\ \\\\ [0.86;0.92]$ and $RE=0.20$ [0.19; 0.24]) and localize epicardial breakthrough sites $(LE=17.16\\\\ \\\\ [8.87;22.14])$. Furthermore, it reduced the frequency of artificial lines of block (2 of 5 pig hearts).\",\"PeriodicalId\":126746,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"2021 Computing in Cardiology (CinC)\",\"volume\":\"31 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2021-09-13\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"2021 Computing in Cardiology (CinC)\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.23919/cinc53138.2021.9662809\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"2021 Computing in Cardiology (CinC)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.23919/cinc53138.2021.9662809","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

同时记录麻醉、闭胸猪(n=5)在窦性心律期间的躯干表面和室性心外膜电位。利用三种经典的ECGI方法和一种局部选择最优ECGI方法的新方法Patchwork method (PM),从记录的躯干电位中估计激活时间,并通过模拟数据证明了其有效性。本研究的目的是利用实验数据评价Patchwork法在窦性心律中的应用。通过比较经典的ECGI重建与记录的心外膜激活图,本研究强调了ECGI图中的一些不准确之处。这涉及重建激活地图、定位突破地点和生成人工块线的不准确性。然而,PM克服了这些限制,证明了它能够准确地重建激活图$(CC=0.90\ \[0.86;0.92]$和$RE=0.20$ [0.19;0.24])和定位心外膜突破部位$(LE=17.16\ \[8.87;22.14])$。此外,它减少了人工阻塞线的频率(5个猪心脏中的2个)。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Evaluation of the ECGI Patchwork Method Using Experimental Data in Sinus Rhythm
Torso surface and ventricular epicardial potentials were recorded simultaneously in anesthetized, closed-chest pigs $(n=5)$ during sinus rhythm. Activation times were estimated from recorded torso potentials using three classical ECGI methods and a new method called the Patchwork Method (PM), which locally selects the optimal ECGI method and has demonstrated its efficiency with simulated data. The aim of this study was to evaluate the Patchwork method using experimental data in sinus rhythm. By comparing the classic ECGI reconstructions to recorded epicardial activation mapping, several inaccuracies in the ECGI maps are highlighted in this study. This involved inaccuracies in reconstructing activating maps, locating breakthrough sites and the production of artificial lines of block. However, the PM overcomes these restrictions, demonstrating its abilities to accurately reconstruct activation maps $(CC=0.90\ \ [0.86;0.92]$ and $RE=0.20$ [0.19; 0.24]) and localize epicardial breakthrough sites $(LE=17.16\ \ [8.87;22.14])$. Furthermore, it reduced the frequency of artificial lines of block (2 of 5 pig hearts).
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信