财务绩效保证和竞争策略的适度影响

R. Sitorus, Wimbildon Sihotang
{"title":"财务绩效保证和竞争策略的适度影响","authors":"R. Sitorus, Wimbildon Sihotang","doi":"10.52447/jam.v2i1.912","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This study was conducted to examine the effect of promotional costs and debt policy on financial performance with competitive strategy as moderating. Research was conducted on property and real estate companies listed on the Indonesian Stock Exchange. The independent variables of this research are the cost of sale by proxy log promotional costs and debt policy with proxy Debt To Equity Ratio (DER). The dependent variable of this research is financial performance calculated using Return On Equity (ROE) with a competitive strategy as moderating using proxies are cost leadership was measured by Utiliziation Asset Efficiency (AUE) and differentiation was measured using the Premium Price Capability (PPC). The samples used were 29 properties and real estate companies listed on the stock exchange during the period 2011-2015 and generate profits. This study was conducted descriptive and use multiple regression. The research proved that the fee did not significantly affect the Promotion of Financial Performance. Debt policy significantly affected financial performance. Moderation Cost Leadership Competitive Strategy and Competitive Differentiation Strategy significantly affected financial performance. Cost Leadership Competitive Strategy and Competitive Differentiation Strategy can not amplify the effect of the fee on the Promotion of Financial Performance. Competitive Cost Leadership strategy, were not able to moderate the influence of Debt Policy on Financial Performance. Differentiation Competitive Strategy was able to moderate the influence of Debt Policy on Financial Performance.","PeriodicalId":447299,"journal":{"name":"Jurnal Akuntansi Manajerial (Managerial Accounting Journal)","volume":"43 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2017-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"DETERMINAN KINERJA KEUANGAN DAN DAMPAK MODERASI STRATEGI BERSAING\",\"authors\":\"R. Sitorus, Wimbildon Sihotang\",\"doi\":\"10.52447/jam.v2i1.912\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"This study was conducted to examine the effect of promotional costs and debt policy on financial performance with competitive strategy as moderating. Research was conducted on property and real estate companies listed on the Indonesian Stock Exchange. The independent variables of this research are the cost of sale by proxy log promotional costs and debt policy with proxy Debt To Equity Ratio (DER). The dependent variable of this research is financial performance calculated using Return On Equity (ROE) with a competitive strategy as moderating using proxies are cost leadership was measured by Utiliziation Asset Efficiency (AUE) and differentiation was measured using the Premium Price Capability (PPC). The samples used were 29 properties and real estate companies listed on the stock exchange during the period 2011-2015 and generate profits. This study was conducted descriptive and use multiple regression. The research proved that the fee did not significantly affect the Promotion of Financial Performance. Debt policy significantly affected financial performance. Moderation Cost Leadership Competitive Strategy and Competitive Differentiation Strategy significantly affected financial performance. Cost Leadership Competitive Strategy and Competitive Differentiation Strategy can not amplify the effect of the fee on the Promotion of Financial Performance. Competitive Cost Leadership strategy, were not able to moderate the influence of Debt Policy on Financial Performance. Differentiation Competitive Strategy was able to moderate the influence of Debt Policy on Financial Performance.\",\"PeriodicalId\":447299,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Jurnal Akuntansi Manajerial (Managerial Accounting Journal)\",\"volume\":\"43 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2017-07-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Jurnal Akuntansi Manajerial (Managerial Accounting Journal)\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.52447/jam.v2i1.912\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Jurnal Akuntansi Manajerial (Managerial Accounting Journal)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.52447/jam.v2i1.912","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

本研究以竞争策略为调节因子,探讨促销成本与负债政策对财务绩效的影响。研究对象是在印尼证券交易所上市的房地产公司。本研究的自变量为代理日志的销售成本、促销成本和代理债务权益比(DER)的债务政策。本研究的因变量是使用净资产收益率(ROE)计算的财务绩效,竞争策略作为调节使用代理,成本领先是通过利用资产效率(AUE)衡量的,差异化是使用溢价能力(PPC)衡量的。所使用的样本是2011-2015年期间在证券交易所上市并产生利润的29家房地产公司。本研究采用描述性和多元回归方法。研究证明,费用对财务绩效的提升没有显著影响。债务政策显著影响财务业绩。适度成本领先竞争战略和差异化竞争战略显著影响财务绩效。成本领先竞争战略和差异化竞争战略不能放大费用对财务绩效的促进作用。竞争成本领先战略,并不能缓和债务政策对财务绩效的影响。差异化竞争策略能够调节债务政策对财务绩效的影响。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
DETERMINAN KINERJA KEUANGAN DAN DAMPAK MODERASI STRATEGI BERSAING
This study was conducted to examine the effect of promotional costs and debt policy on financial performance with competitive strategy as moderating. Research was conducted on property and real estate companies listed on the Indonesian Stock Exchange. The independent variables of this research are the cost of sale by proxy log promotional costs and debt policy with proxy Debt To Equity Ratio (DER). The dependent variable of this research is financial performance calculated using Return On Equity (ROE) with a competitive strategy as moderating using proxies are cost leadership was measured by Utiliziation Asset Efficiency (AUE) and differentiation was measured using the Premium Price Capability (PPC). The samples used were 29 properties and real estate companies listed on the stock exchange during the period 2011-2015 and generate profits. This study was conducted descriptive and use multiple regression. The research proved that the fee did not significantly affect the Promotion of Financial Performance. Debt policy significantly affected financial performance. Moderation Cost Leadership Competitive Strategy and Competitive Differentiation Strategy significantly affected financial performance. Cost Leadership Competitive Strategy and Competitive Differentiation Strategy can not amplify the effect of the fee on the Promotion of Financial Performance. Competitive Cost Leadership strategy, were not able to moderate the influence of Debt Policy on Financial Performance. Differentiation Competitive Strategy was able to moderate the influence of Debt Policy on Financial Performance.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信