护理学生潜在的过度治疗:来自三所南非高等教育机构的研究

A. Makkink, E. Barnard
{"title":"护理学生潜在的过度治疗:来自三所南非高等教育机构的研究","authors":"A. Makkink, E. Barnard","doi":"10.33151/ajp.19.977","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Introduction Healthcare students are often required to perform predetermined numbers of clinical skills to prove competence. The pressures of meeting predetermined clinical skill numbers may result in students overtreating patients. Overtreatment is not without consequence to the patient. This study aimed to investigate perceptions related to possible overtreatment of patients by emergency medical care students in three South African higher education institutions (HEIs). Methods This cross-sectional study used a purpose-designed, anonymous online questionnaire to collect data on possible patient overtreatment from emergency medical care student participants at three South African HEIs. Results Of the participants, 45 self-reported reasonably low incidences of overtreatment of patients. The prescribed skill requirements were deemed appropriate as were practical shift numbers, but there was concern about achieving prescribed skill numbers. Participants generally considered risk versus benefit and clinical mentors generally agreed with student decisions without permitting overtreatment practices. Intravenous (IV) cannulation, oxygen administration and spinal immobilisation were the most common forms of overtreatment with advanced airway management and IV cannulation the most difficult to achieve. Lack of appropriately qualified practitioners and low patient numbers were the most common barriers to achieving required skill numbers. Conclusion There was concern among participants about not reaching prerequisite skill numbers. Self-reported overtreatment of patients by participants was uncommon. The list of self-reported procedures most often forming part of overtreatment seemed to contradict this. The most common forms of overtreatment were clinical procedures that posed potential risk to the patient. There is a need to further explore overtreatment within healthcare student populations.","PeriodicalId":340334,"journal":{"name":"Australian Journal of Paramedicine","volume":"85 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Potential Overtreatment by Paramedic Students: A Study from Three South African Higher Education Institutions\",\"authors\":\"A. Makkink, E. Barnard\",\"doi\":\"10.33151/ajp.19.977\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Introduction Healthcare students are often required to perform predetermined numbers of clinical skills to prove competence. The pressures of meeting predetermined clinical skill numbers may result in students overtreating patients. Overtreatment is not without consequence to the patient. This study aimed to investigate perceptions related to possible overtreatment of patients by emergency medical care students in three South African higher education institutions (HEIs). Methods This cross-sectional study used a purpose-designed, anonymous online questionnaire to collect data on possible patient overtreatment from emergency medical care student participants at three South African HEIs. Results Of the participants, 45 self-reported reasonably low incidences of overtreatment of patients. The prescribed skill requirements were deemed appropriate as were practical shift numbers, but there was concern about achieving prescribed skill numbers. Participants generally considered risk versus benefit and clinical mentors generally agreed with student decisions without permitting overtreatment practices. Intravenous (IV) cannulation, oxygen administration and spinal immobilisation were the most common forms of overtreatment with advanced airway management and IV cannulation the most difficult to achieve. Lack of appropriately qualified practitioners and low patient numbers were the most common barriers to achieving required skill numbers. Conclusion There was concern among participants about not reaching prerequisite skill numbers. Self-reported overtreatment of patients by participants was uncommon. The list of self-reported procedures most often forming part of overtreatment seemed to contradict this. The most common forms of overtreatment were clinical procedures that posed potential risk to the patient. There is a need to further explore overtreatment within healthcare student populations.\",\"PeriodicalId\":340334,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Australian Journal of Paramedicine\",\"volume\":\"85 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"1\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Australian Journal of Paramedicine\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.33151/ajp.19.977\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Australian Journal of Paramedicine","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.33151/ajp.19.977","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

摘要

医疗保健专业的学生通常需要执行预定数量的临床技能来证明自己的能力。达到预定的临床技能数字的压力可能导致学生过度治疗病人。过度治疗对病人并非没有后果。本研究旨在调查南非三所高等教育机构(HEIs)急诊医疗专业学生对患者可能过度治疗的看法。方法:本横断面研究采用一份专门设计的匿名在线问卷,收集南非三所高等教育机构急诊医学专业学生参与者中可能出现的患者过度治疗的数据。结果45例患者自我报告的过度治疗发生率较低。规定的技能要求被认为是适当的,因为是实际的轮班数,但是有关于实现规定的技能数的关注。参与者普遍考虑风险与收益的对比,临床导师普遍同意学生的决定,不允许过度治疗。静脉(IV)插管,给氧和脊柱固定是最常见的过度治疗形式,先进的气道管理和静脉插管是最难实现的。缺乏适当合格的从业人员和低患者数量是达到所需技能数量的最常见障碍。结论:参与者担心没有达到必要的技能数。参与者自我报告的过度治疗患者并不常见。最常构成过度治疗一部分的自我报告程序列表似乎与此相矛盾。最常见的过度治疗形式是对患者构成潜在风险的临床程序。有必要进一步探讨医疗保健学生群体中的过度治疗。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Potential Overtreatment by Paramedic Students: A Study from Three South African Higher Education Institutions
Introduction Healthcare students are often required to perform predetermined numbers of clinical skills to prove competence. The pressures of meeting predetermined clinical skill numbers may result in students overtreating patients. Overtreatment is not without consequence to the patient. This study aimed to investigate perceptions related to possible overtreatment of patients by emergency medical care students in three South African higher education institutions (HEIs). Methods This cross-sectional study used a purpose-designed, anonymous online questionnaire to collect data on possible patient overtreatment from emergency medical care student participants at three South African HEIs. Results Of the participants, 45 self-reported reasonably low incidences of overtreatment of patients. The prescribed skill requirements were deemed appropriate as were practical shift numbers, but there was concern about achieving prescribed skill numbers. Participants generally considered risk versus benefit and clinical mentors generally agreed with student decisions without permitting overtreatment practices. Intravenous (IV) cannulation, oxygen administration and spinal immobilisation were the most common forms of overtreatment with advanced airway management and IV cannulation the most difficult to achieve. Lack of appropriately qualified practitioners and low patient numbers were the most common barriers to achieving required skill numbers. Conclusion There was concern among participants about not reaching prerequisite skill numbers. Self-reported overtreatment of patients by participants was uncommon. The list of self-reported procedures most often forming part of overtreatment seemed to contradict this. The most common forms of overtreatment were clinical procedures that posed potential risk to the patient. There is a need to further explore overtreatment within healthcare student populations.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信