协同效应与内部代理冲突:并购的双刃剑

P. Fulghieri, L. Hodrick
{"title":"协同效应与内部代理冲突:并购的双刃剑","authors":"P. Fulghieri, L. Hodrick","doi":"10.1111/j.1530-9134.2006.00110.x","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"\"This paper investigates the interaction between synergies and internal agency conflicts that emerges endogenously in multi-division firms. A divisional manager's entrenchment choice depends directly on the specificity of her division's assets, because the specificity governs whether entrenchment activities reduce the likelihood of her division being divested. The presence of synergies, by modifying the difference between the value of assets in their current use and in alternative uses, may alter the divisional manager's entrenchment incentive. In \"the double-edged sword of mergers,\" synergy and internal agency effects are of opposite sign and merger gains may not be increasing in expected synergies. We characterize when divisions should optimally stand alone and when they should be part of a merged firm. We predict an absence of diversifying mergers in industries plagued by misdeployed assets, offer a novel explanation for the cross-sectional variation in postmerger valuation, and explain why mergers may be valuable \"ex ante\" while leading to successful divestitures ex post.\" Copyright 2006, The Author(s) Journal Compilation (c) 2006 Blackwell Publishing.","PeriodicalId":248832,"journal":{"name":"Wiley-Blackwell: Journal of Economics & Management Strategy","volume":"182 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2005-02-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"89","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Synergies and Internal Agency Conflicts: The Double-Edged Sword of Mergers\",\"authors\":\"P. Fulghieri, L. Hodrick\",\"doi\":\"10.1111/j.1530-9134.2006.00110.x\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"\\\"This paper investigates the interaction between synergies and internal agency conflicts that emerges endogenously in multi-division firms. A divisional manager's entrenchment choice depends directly on the specificity of her division's assets, because the specificity governs whether entrenchment activities reduce the likelihood of her division being divested. The presence of synergies, by modifying the difference between the value of assets in their current use and in alternative uses, may alter the divisional manager's entrenchment incentive. In \\\"the double-edged sword of mergers,\\\" synergy and internal agency effects are of opposite sign and merger gains may not be increasing in expected synergies. We characterize when divisions should optimally stand alone and when they should be part of a merged firm. We predict an absence of diversifying mergers in industries plagued by misdeployed assets, offer a novel explanation for the cross-sectional variation in postmerger valuation, and explain why mergers may be valuable \\\"ex ante\\\" while leading to successful divestitures ex post.\\\" Copyright 2006, The Author(s) Journal Compilation (c) 2006 Blackwell Publishing.\",\"PeriodicalId\":248832,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Wiley-Blackwell: Journal of Economics & Management Strategy\",\"volume\":\"182 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2005-02-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"89\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Wiley-Blackwell: Journal of Economics & Management Strategy\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1530-9134.2006.00110.x\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Wiley-Blackwell: Journal of Economics & Management Strategy","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1530-9134.2006.00110.x","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 89

摘要

本文研究了多部门企业内部代理冲突与协同效应之间的相互作用。部门经理的堑壕选择直接取决于其部门资产的特殊性,因为这种特殊性决定了堑壕活动是否降低了其部门被剥离的可能性。协同效应的存在,通过改变资产当前使用和替代使用之间的价值差异,可能会改变部门经理的堑壕激励。在“并购双刃剑”中,协同效应和内部代理效应是相反的符号,并购收益在预期协同效应下可能不会增加。我们描述了什么时候部门应该独立,什么时候它们应该成为合并公司的一部分。我们预测,在受资产配置不当困扰的行业中,将缺乏多元化的并购,为并购后估值的横截面变化提供了一种新的解释,并解释了为什么并购可能“事前”有价值,同时导致事后成功的剥离。版权所有2006,作者(s)期刊汇编(c) 2006布莱克威尔出版社。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Synergies and Internal Agency Conflicts: The Double-Edged Sword of Mergers
"This paper investigates the interaction between synergies and internal agency conflicts that emerges endogenously in multi-division firms. A divisional manager's entrenchment choice depends directly on the specificity of her division's assets, because the specificity governs whether entrenchment activities reduce the likelihood of her division being divested. The presence of synergies, by modifying the difference between the value of assets in their current use and in alternative uses, may alter the divisional manager's entrenchment incentive. In "the double-edged sword of mergers," synergy and internal agency effects are of opposite sign and merger gains may not be increasing in expected synergies. We characterize when divisions should optimally stand alone and when they should be part of a merged firm. We predict an absence of diversifying mergers in industries plagued by misdeployed assets, offer a novel explanation for the cross-sectional variation in postmerger valuation, and explain why mergers may be valuable "ex ante" while leading to successful divestitures ex post." Copyright 2006, The Author(s) Journal Compilation (c) 2006 Blackwell Publishing.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信