9危机后的监管反应

{"title":"9危机后的监管反应","authors":"","doi":"10.1093/law/9780198816935.003.0009","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This chapter looks at those rules of regulatory law that have been promulgated since - and largely because of - the 2008 global financial crisis, and which concern collateral transactions. It first examines the European Market Infrastructure Regulation (EMIR). This regulation, of which US law has a similar counterpart in the Dodd-Frank Act, has led to a massive increase in need of financial collateral. However, both legislative instruments do not seem to have direct consequences under private law. In contrast, the EU Markets in Financial Instruments Directive II and the Securities Finance Transactions Regulation of 2015 have imposed restrictions on entering into collateral transactions and contain several information requirements. These instruments may lead to consequences under private law, but not necessarily. This is different for recent EU and US rules concerning investment funds. Here, the private law consequences are obvious - and mostly unwarranted.","PeriodicalId":117130,"journal":{"name":"Financial Collateral","volume":"21 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2020-11-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"9 Post-Crisis Regulatory Responses\",\"authors\":\"\",\"doi\":\"10.1093/law/9780198816935.003.0009\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"This chapter looks at those rules of regulatory law that have been promulgated since - and largely because of - the 2008 global financial crisis, and which concern collateral transactions. It first examines the European Market Infrastructure Regulation (EMIR). This regulation, of which US law has a similar counterpart in the Dodd-Frank Act, has led to a massive increase in need of financial collateral. However, both legislative instruments do not seem to have direct consequences under private law. In contrast, the EU Markets in Financial Instruments Directive II and the Securities Finance Transactions Regulation of 2015 have imposed restrictions on entering into collateral transactions and contain several information requirements. These instruments may lead to consequences under private law, but not necessarily. This is different for recent EU and US rules concerning investment funds. Here, the private law consequences are obvious - and mostly unwarranted.\",\"PeriodicalId\":117130,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Financial Collateral\",\"volume\":\"21 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2020-11-12\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Financial Collateral\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1093/law/9780198816935.003.0009\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Financial Collateral","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/law/9780198816935.003.0009","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

本章考察了自2008年全球金融危机以来(主要是因为2008年全球金融危机)颁布的监管法律规则,这些规则涉及抵押交易。它首先考察了欧洲市场基础设施法规(EMIR)。美国《多德-弗兰克法案》(Dodd-Frank Act)中也有类似的规定,这一规定导致金融抵押品需求大幅增加。然而,这两项立法文书似乎对私法没有直接影响。相比之下,欧盟金融工具市场指令II和2015年证券金融交易条例对进入抵押品交易施加了限制,并包含若干信息要求。这些文书可能导致私法规定的后果,但并非必然。这与欧盟和美国最近有关投资基金的规定不同。在这里,私法的后果是显而易见的——而且大多是没有根据的。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
9 Post-Crisis Regulatory Responses
This chapter looks at those rules of regulatory law that have been promulgated since - and largely because of - the 2008 global financial crisis, and which concern collateral transactions. It first examines the European Market Infrastructure Regulation (EMIR). This regulation, of which US law has a similar counterpart in the Dodd-Frank Act, has led to a massive increase in need of financial collateral. However, both legislative instruments do not seem to have direct consequences under private law. In contrast, the EU Markets in Financial Instruments Directive II and the Securities Finance Transactions Regulation of 2015 have imposed restrictions on entering into collateral transactions and contain several information requirements. These instruments may lead to consequences under private law, but not necessarily. This is different for recent EU and US rules concerning investment funds. Here, the private law consequences are obvious - and mostly unwarranted.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信