{"title":"基于成本和年龄的刚性和弹性弹性比较(帮助KRETEK - 2案例研究)","authors":"Muhammad Nauval Ibrahim, A. Narendra","doi":"10.53866/jimi.v3i1.100","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The construction of LOT-3 Kretek 2 Bridge is part of the Southern Cross Road (JJLS) Java Island. This bridge was built to connect the Samas–Kretek and Kretek–Parangtritis roads in Bantul Regency, which are separated from the Opak River. In this study, we will compare rigid pavement planning and flexible pavement at the LOT-3 Kretek 2 Bridge project site, guided by the “Manual Desain Perkerasan Jalan 2017 Bina Marga”. Then the two pavements will be compared to get a more economical and long-lived pavement. Finally, based on data processing results, the flexible pavement is planned with a thickness of AC-WC = 40 mm, AC-BC = 60 mm, AC-Base = 160 mm, Aggregate Class A = 300 mm, and support layer = 100 mm. Meanwhile, for rigid pavement, cement concrete pavement with unreinforced joints is used with a concrete slab thickness = 300 mm, a thin concrete layer = 100 mm, and a drainage layer = 150 mm. From the analysis and calculation, the budget plan for flexible pavement is Rp. 15,382,772,000.00 with a design life of 20 years, while the rigid pavement is Rp. 18,093,230,000.00 with a design life of 40 years. So, rigid pavement is more economical because the price is 14.98% higher but has twice the design life.","PeriodicalId":414894,"journal":{"name":"Citizen : Jurnal Ilmiah Multidisiplin Indonesia","volume":"68 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-02-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"PERBANDINGAN PERKERASAN KAKU DAN PERKERASAN LENTUR BERDASARKAN BIAYA DAN UMUR RENCANA (STUDI KASUS LOT-3 JEMBATAN KRETEK 2 BANTUL)\",\"authors\":\"Muhammad Nauval Ibrahim, A. Narendra\",\"doi\":\"10.53866/jimi.v3i1.100\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"The construction of LOT-3 Kretek 2 Bridge is part of the Southern Cross Road (JJLS) Java Island. This bridge was built to connect the Samas–Kretek and Kretek–Parangtritis roads in Bantul Regency, which are separated from the Opak River. In this study, we will compare rigid pavement planning and flexible pavement at the LOT-3 Kretek 2 Bridge project site, guided by the “Manual Desain Perkerasan Jalan 2017 Bina Marga”. Then the two pavements will be compared to get a more economical and long-lived pavement. Finally, based on data processing results, the flexible pavement is planned with a thickness of AC-WC = 40 mm, AC-BC = 60 mm, AC-Base = 160 mm, Aggregate Class A = 300 mm, and support layer = 100 mm. Meanwhile, for rigid pavement, cement concrete pavement with unreinforced joints is used with a concrete slab thickness = 300 mm, a thin concrete layer = 100 mm, and a drainage layer = 150 mm. From the analysis and calculation, the budget plan for flexible pavement is Rp. 15,382,772,000.00 with a design life of 20 years, while the rigid pavement is Rp. 18,093,230,000.00 with a design life of 40 years. So, rigid pavement is more economical because the price is 14.98% higher but has twice the design life.\",\"PeriodicalId\":414894,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Citizen : Jurnal Ilmiah Multidisiplin Indonesia\",\"volume\":\"68 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-02-15\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Citizen : Jurnal Ilmiah Multidisiplin Indonesia\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.53866/jimi.v3i1.100\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Citizen : Jurnal Ilmiah Multidisiplin Indonesia","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.53866/jimi.v3i1.100","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
LOT-3 Kretek 2桥的建设是爪哇岛南十字路(JJLS)的一部分。这座桥是为了连接班图尔县的Samas-Kretek和Kretek-Parangtritis道路而建造的,这两条道路与奥帕克河分开。在本研究中,我们将在“Manual Desain Perkerasan Jalan 2017 Bina Marga”的指导下,比较LOT-3 Kretek 2桥项目现场的刚性路面规划和柔性路面规划。然后将两种路面进行比较,以获得更经济、更长寿的路面。最后,根据数据处理结果,规划柔性路面厚度AC-WC = 40 mm, AC-BC = 60 mm, AC-Base = 160 mm,骨料a级= 300 mm,支撑层= 100 mm。刚性路面采用无配筋接缝水泥混凝土路面,混凝土板厚度300mm,薄混凝土层厚度100mm,排水层厚度150mm。通过分析计算,柔性路面的预算方案为Rp. 15,382,772,000.00,设计寿命为20年;刚性路面的预算方案为Rp. 18,093,230,000 0.00,设计寿命为40年。因此,刚性路面价格高出14.98%,但使用寿命是设计寿命的两倍,更加经济。
PERBANDINGAN PERKERASAN KAKU DAN PERKERASAN LENTUR BERDASARKAN BIAYA DAN UMUR RENCANA (STUDI KASUS LOT-3 JEMBATAN KRETEK 2 BANTUL)
The construction of LOT-3 Kretek 2 Bridge is part of the Southern Cross Road (JJLS) Java Island. This bridge was built to connect the Samas–Kretek and Kretek–Parangtritis roads in Bantul Regency, which are separated from the Opak River. In this study, we will compare rigid pavement planning and flexible pavement at the LOT-3 Kretek 2 Bridge project site, guided by the “Manual Desain Perkerasan Jalan 2017 Bina Marga”. Then the two pavements will be compared to get a more economical and long-lived pavement. Finally, based on data processing results, the flexible pavement is planned with a thickness of AC-WC = 40 mm, AC-BC = 60 mm, AC-Base = 160 mm, Aggregate Class A = 300 mm, and support layer = 100 mm. Meanwhile, for rigid pavement, cement concrete pavement with unreinforced joints is used with a concrete slab thickness = 300 mm, a thin concrete layer = 100 mm, and a drainage layer = 150 mm. From the analysis and calculation, the budget plan for flexible pavement is Rp. 15,382,772,000.00 with a design life of 20 years, while the rigid pavement is Rp. 18,093,230,000.00 with a design life of 40 years. So, rigid pavement is more economical because the price is 14.98% higher but has twice the design life.