整体纵向应变在二尖瓣反流中的应用:系统综述

Jesu Krupa, Dorothy Lall
{"title":"整体纵向应变在二尖瓣反流中的应用:系统综述","authors":"Jesu Krupa, Dorothy Lall","doi":"10.4103/jiae.jiae_33_23","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Background: The assessment of myocardial function is important in both primary and secondary mitral regurgitation (MR), to determine the timing of interventions and to predict outcomes. Ejection fraction is relied on for clinical decisions, even though, it is well understood that it does not reflect myocardial function. Global longitudinal strain (GLS) is a promising parameter that correlates well with outcomes postinterventions. In this review, we aimed to determine the utility of GLS in both primary and secondary MR in predicting clinical outcomes. We also aimed to determine the GLS cutoff at which clinical decisions can be made. Methods: We conducted a systematic review of the literature regarding the use of GLS as a predictor of left ventricular (LV) function. We searched PubMed and Embase for relevant articles and identified 141 articles after removing duplicates. We screened titles and abstracts to identify 28 relevant articles from which data were extracted. Results: In 16 of the 28 studies, patients had primary MR mostly of degenerative etiology and the LV GLS cutoff for events ranged from −17.2% to −21%. In 10 studies, patients with secondary MR were included, and a cutoff ranging from −7%− to −9% was most often reported except for one study that reported-16.3%, as it included patients with atrial functional MR. Conclusion: GLS assesses LV dysfunction and is a good predictor of clinical and echocardiographic outcomes postinterventions. Values lower than the cutoff value of −17.2% to −21% in primary MR and −7% to −9% in secondary MR are associated with poorer outcomes. These findings suggest that the use of GLS as a routine assessment in patients with significant MR may be appropriate for both clinical decision-making and prognostication.","PeriodicalId":325663,"journal":{"name":"Journal of The Indian Academy of Echocardiography & Cardiovascular Imaging","volume":"19 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-05-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Utility of Global Longitudinal Strain in Mitral Regurgitation: A Systematic Review\",\"authors\":\"Jesu Krupa, Dorothy Lall\",\"doi\":\"10.4103/jiae.jiae_33_23\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Background: The assessment of myocardial function is important in both primary and secondary mitral regurgitation (MR), to determine the timing of interventions and to predict outcomes. Ejection fraction is relied on for clinical decisions, even though, it is well understood that it does not reflect myocardial function. Global longitudinal strain (GLS) is a promising parameter that correlates well with outcomes postinterventions. In this review, we aimed to determine the utility of GLS in both primary and secondary MR in predicting clinical outcomes. We also aimed to determine the GLS cutoff at which clinical decisions can be made. Methods: We conducted a systematic review of the literature regarding the use of GLS as a predictor of left ventricular (LV) function. We searched PubMed and Embase for relevant articles and identified 141 articles after removing duplicates. We screened titles and abstracts to identify 28 relevant articles from which data were extracted. Results: In 16 of the 28 studies, patients had primary MR mostly of degenerative etiology and the LV GLS cutoff for events ranged from −17.2% to −21%. In 10 studies, patients with secondary MR were included, and a cutoff ranging from −7%− to −9% was most often reported except for one study that reported-16.3%, as it included patients with atrial functional MR. Conclusion: GLS assesses LV dysfunction and is a good predictor of clinical and echocardiographic outcomes postinterventions. Values lower than the cutoff value of −17.2% to −21% in primary MR and −7% to −9% in secondary MR are associated with poorer outcomes. These findings suggest that the use of GLS as a routine assessment in patients with significant MR may be appropriate for both clinical decision-making and prognostication.\",\"PeriodicalId\":325663,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of The Indian Academy of Echocardiography & Cardiovascular Imaging\",\"volume\":\"19 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-05-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of The Indian Academy of Echocardiography & Cardiovascular Imaging\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.4103/jiae.jiae_33_23\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of The Indian Academy of Echocardiography & Cardiovascular Imaging","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4103/jiae.jiae_33_23","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:在原发性和继发性二尖瓣反流(MR)中,心肌功能评估对于确定干预时机和预测预后都很重要。尽管众所周知射血分数不能反映心肌功能,但临床决策仍依赖于射血分数。总体纵向应变(GLS)是一个很有前途的参数,与干预后的结果相关。在这篇综述中,我们旨在确定GLS在原发性和继发性MR中预测临床结果的效用。我们还旨在确定GLS截止点,以便做出临床决策。方法:我们对GLS作为左室(LV)功能预测指标的文献进行了系统回顾。我们在PubMed和Embase检索了相关文章,并在删除重复后确定了141篇文章。我们筛选了标题和摘要,确定了28篇相关的文章,从中提取了数据。结果:在28项研究中的16项中,患者的原发性MR主要是退行性病因,事件的LV GLS截止范围为- 17.2%至- 21%。在10项研究中,继发性MR患者被纳入,除一项研究报告的-16.3%外,最常报道的截止范围为- 7%至- 9%,因为它包括心房功能性MR患者。结论:GLS评估左室功能障碍,是干预后临床和超声心动图结果的良好预测指标。原发性MR低于- 17.2%至- 21%的临界值,继发性MR低于- 7%至- 9%的临界值与较差的预后相关。这些发现表明,GLS作为显著MR患者的常规评估可能适用于临床决策和预后。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Utility of Global Longitudinal Strain in Mitral Regurgitation: A Systematic Review
Background: The assessment of myocardial function is important in both primary and secondary mitral regurgitation (MR), to determine the timing of interventions and to predict outcomes. Ejection fraction is relied on for clinical decisions, even though, it is well understood that it does not reflect myocardial function. Global longitudinal strain (GLS) is a promising parameter that correlates well with outcomes postinterventions. In this review, we aimed to determine the utility of GLS in both primary and secondary MR in predicting clinical outcomes. We also aimed to determine the GLS cutoff at which clinical decisions can be made. Methods: We conducted a systematic review of the literature regarding the use of GLS as a predictor of left ventricular (LV) function. We searched PubMed and Embase for relevant articles and identified 141 articles after removing duplicates. We screened titles and abstracts to identify 28 relevant articles from which data were extracted. Results: In 16 of the 28 studies, patients had primary MR mostly of degenerative etiology and the LV GLS cutoff for events ranged from −17.2% to −21%. In 10 studies, patients with secondary MR were included, and a cutoff ranging from −7%− to −9% was most often reported except for one study that reported-16.3%, as it included patients with atrial functional MR. Conclusion: GLS assesses LV dysfunction and is a good predictor of clinical and echocardiographic outcomes postinterventions. Values lower than the cutoff value of −17.2% to −21% in primary MR and −7% to −9% in secondary MR are associated with poorer outcomes. These findings suggest that the use of GLS as a routine assessment in patients with significant MR may be appropriate for both clinical decision-making and prognostication.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信