用于优化Kappa作为糖尿病视网膜病变和前列腺癌图像分类评价指标的损失函数

Rajendran Nirthika, Siyamalan Manivannan, A. Ramanan
{"title":"用于优化Kappa作为糖尿病视网膜病变和前列腺癌图像分类评价指标的损失函数","authors":"Rajendran Nirthika, Siyamalan Manivannan, A. Ramanan","doi":"10.1109/ICIIS51140.2020.9342711","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Quadratic Weighted Kappa (QWK) is a statistic to measure the agreement between two annotators. QWK has been widely used as the evaluation measure for various medical imaging problems, where, the class labels have a natural ordering, e.g., no Diabetic Retinopathy (DR), mild DR, and severe DR. The easiest way to treat the classification problem with these ordinal labels is to consider the problem as a multiclass classification problem and apply the Cross Entropy (CE) loss. However, when applying CE loss the order of the classes becomes meaningless, i.e., the loss will be same if a healthy image is classified into mild DR or severe DR. At the same time, the QWK score will be severely affected if a healthy image is classified into severe DR than mild DR. The most appropriate way to get a better classification score is to optimize the evaluation measure itself. i.e., directly optimize the QWK statistics. However, this optimization may hinder the learning, and may lead to sub-optimal solutions, and therefore, may give lower performance than expected. On the other hand, Ordinal Regression (OR) based approaches also can be used for such problems. The main focus of this work is to investigate which loss function (CE loss, QWK loss or OR loss) is the most appropriate one to the Convolutional Neural Network-based ordinal classification problems, where, QWK is used as the evaluation measure. Experiments on two public datasets, Diabetic Retinopathy and Prostate Cancer, with two different network architectures suggest that directly optimizing QWK is the better choice when small networks are used. On the other hand, we found that for large networks OR based loss function gives better performance.","PeriodicalId":352858,"journal":{"name":"2020 IEEE 15th International Conference on Industrial and Information Systems (ICIIS)","volume":"135 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2020-11-26","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"5","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Loss functions for optimizing Kappa as the evaluation measure for classifying diabetic retinopathy and prostate cancer images\",\"authors\":\"Rajendran Nirthika, Siyamalan Manivannan, A. Ramanan\",\"doi\":\"10.1109/ICIIS51140.2020.9342711\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Quadratic Weighted Kappa (QWK) is a statistic to measure the agreement between two annotators. QWK has been widely used as the evaluation measure for various medical imaging problems, where, the class labels have a natural ordering, e.g., no Diabetic Retinopathy (DR), mild DR, and severe DR. The easiest way to treat the classification problem with these ordinal labels is to consider the problem as a multiclass classification problem and apply the Cross Entropy (CE) loss. However, when applying CE loss the order of the classes becomes meaningless, i.e., the loss will be same if a healthy image is classified into mild DR or severe DR. At the same time, the QWK score will be severely affected if a healthy image is classified into severe DR than mild DR. The most appropriate way to get a better classification score is to optimize the evaluation measure itself. i.e., directly optimize the QWK statistics. However, this optimization may hinder the learning, and may lead to sub-optimal solutions, and therefore, may give lower performance than expected. On the other hand, Ordinal Regression (OR) based approaches also can be used for such problems. The main focus of this work is to investigate which loss function (CE loss, QWK loss or OR loss) is the most appropriate one to the Convolutional Neural Network-based ordinal classification problems, where, QWK is used as the evaluation measure. Experiments on two public datasets, Diabetic Retinopathy and Prostate Cancer, with two different network architectures suggest that directly optimizing QWK is the better choice when small networks are used. On the other hand, we found that for large networks OR based loss function gives better performance.\",\"PeriodicalId\":352858,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"2020 IEEE 15th International Conference on Industrial and Information Systems (ICIIS)\",\"volume\":\"135 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2020-11-26\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"5\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"2020 IEEE 15th International Conference on Industrial and Information Systems (ICIIS)\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1109/ICIIS51140.2020.9342711\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"2020 IEEE 15th International Conference on Industrial and Information Systems (ICIIS)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/ICIIS51140.2020.9342711","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 5

摘要

二次加权Kappa (Quadratic Weighted Kappa, QWK)是衡量两个注释者之间一致性的统计量。QWK已被广泛用于各种医学影像问题的评价度量,其中,类别标签具有自然的顺序,例如,无糖尿病视网膜病变(DR),轻度DR和严重DR。处理这些有序标签的分类问题最简单的方法是将问题视为一个多类别分类问题,并应用交叉熵(CE)损失。然而,当应用CE损失时,分类的顺序变得没有意义,即健康图像被划分为轻度DR和重度DR的损失是相同的,同时,健康图像被划分为重度DR比轻度DR的QWK评分受到严重影响,获得更好的分类评分最合适的方法是对评价指标本身进行优化。也就是说,直接优化QWK统计数据。然而,这种优化可能会阻碍学习,并可能导致次优解决方案,因此,可能会给出低于预期的性能。另一方面,基于有序回归(OR)的方法也可用于此类问题。本研究的主要重点是研究哪种损失函数(CE损失、QWK损失或or损失)最适合于基于卷积神经网络的有序分类问题,其中QWK作为评价度量。在diabetes Retinopathy和前列腺癌这两个公共数据集上使用两种不同网络架构的实验表明,当使用小型网络时,直接优化QWK是更好的选择。另一方面,我们发现对于大型网络,基于OR的损失函数具有更好的性能。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Loss functions for optimizing Kappa as the evaluation measure for classifying diabetic retinopathy and prostate cancer images
Quadratic Weighted Kappa (QWK) is a statistic to measure the agreement between two annotators. QWK has been widely used as the evaluation measure for various medical imaging problems, where, the class labels have a natural ordering, e.g., no Diabetic Retinopathy (DR), mild DR, and severe DR. The easiest way to treat the classification problem with these ordinal labels is to consider the problem as a multiclass classification problem and apply the Cross Entropy (CE) loss. However, when applying CE loss the order of the classes becomes meaningless, i.e., the loss will be same if a healthy image is classified into mild DR or severe DR. At the same time, the QWK score will be severely affected if a healthy image is classified into severe DR than mild DR. The most appropriate way to get a better classification score is to optimize the evaluation measure itself. i.e., directly optimize the QWK statistics. However, this optimization may hinder the learning, and may lead to sub-optimal solutions, and therefore, may give lower performance than expected. On the other hand, Ordinal Regression (OR) based approaches also can be used for such problems. The main focus of this work is to investigate which loss function (CE loss, QWK loss or OR loss) is the most appropriate one to the Convolutional Neural Network-based ordinal classification problems, where, QWK is used as the evaluation measure. Experiments on two public datasets, Diabetic Retinopathy and Prostate Cancer, with two different network architectures suggest that directly optimizing QWK is the better choice when small networks are used. On the other hand, we found that for large networks OR based loss function gives better performance.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信