地方一级人口生活条件指标体系:组织和使用原则

T. Lukovych, U. S. Leshenok
{"title":"地方一级人口生活条件指标体系:组织和使用原则","authors":"T. Lukovych, U. S. Leshenok","doi":"10.15407/DSE2021.01.101","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The relevance of the article stems from the need to collect and systemize reliable objective information about living conditions of the population at the local level. A necessary condition for managerial decision-making in economy and social policy is reliable estimation of the population’s living conditions united territorial communities (UTC). The article aims to cover the principles of organization and use of a system of indicators for living conditions of the population at the local level. To achieve this aim, general scientifi c methods are used, namely the method of generalization and the system method. The novelty of the article is the formulation of the principles of systematization of information on living conditions at the local level in the form of a system of indicators and the defi nition the tasks of such a system, as well as data sources for implementation these tasks. Based on Ukrainian approaches, “living conditions” are defi ned as a component of quality of life, which includes three groups of indicators: housing availability, quality characteristics of housing and the level of development and accessibility of social infrastructure. Also, to take into account the European experience of studying the living conditions of the population at the local level, for subjective assessments of satisfaction with life of the local population in the settlement, a particular section is introduced in the system of indicators. The focus of this article is on the subjective component, namely the ability to measure life satisfaction in the community and ways to use such subjective assessments within the system of indicators of living conditions at the local level. Satisfaction with life in the settlement is defi ned as an individual’s assessment of quality of own life according to a criterion chosen in a certain way. Several approaches to measuring life satisfaction in the settlement are introduced: approaches in which satisfaction with life is measured on the basis of one indicator, and approaches in which several indicators are used. If satisfaction with life is measured by one direct question, it is one indicator, but in the case of several statements that the respondent evaluates on a certain scale, each statement is a separate indicator. In the further analysis of the collected data such indicators can be analyzed separately or simultaneously by building a general index. Based on the interpretation of the concept of “living conditions”, this article identifi es three objectives for a system of indicators of living conditions of united territorial communities (UTC): monitoring of living conditions, identifying key problems for UTC and comparing diff erent UTCs on the basis of living conditions of the local population. For the fi rst and third objectives, among the possible sources of information, data from registers are offered, and for the second purpose we off er expert surveys, focus group discussions, open group discussions. The problems of data representation are also discussed in this article. Despite the data being quite fragmented, the format of their presentation should be easy for users (both local authorities and community activists and the media). One possible way to present such data is the format used within methodology of citizen report cards.","PeriodicalId":210079,"journal":{"name":"Demography and social economy","volume":"34 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-03-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"System of Indicators for Living Conditions of the Population at the Local Level: Principles of Organization and Use\",\"authors\":\"T. Lukovych, U. S. Leshenok\",\"doi\":\"10.15407/DSE2021.01.101\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"The relevance of the article stems from the need to collect and systemize reliable objective information about living conditions of the population at the local level. A necessary condition for managerial decision-making in economy and social policy is reliable estimation of the population’s living conditions united territorial communities (UTC). The article aims to cover the principles of organization and use of a system of indicators for living conditions of the population at the local level. To achieve this aim, general scientifi c methods are used, namely the method of generalization and the system method. The novelty of the article is the formulation of the principles of systematization of information on living conditions at the local level in the form of a system of indicators and the defi nition the tasks of such a system, as well as data sources for implementation these tasks. Based on Ukrainian approaches, “living conditions” are defi ned as a component of quality of life, which includes three groups of indicators: housing availability, quality characteristics of housing and the level of development and accessibility of social infrastructure. Also, to take into account the European experience of studying the living conditions of the population at the local level, for subjective assessments of satisfaction with life of the local population in the settlement, a particular section is introduced in the system of indicators. The focus of this article is on the subjective component, namely the ability to measure life satisfaction in the community and ways to use such subjective assessments within the system of indicators of living conditions at the local level. Satisfaction with life in the settlement is defi ned as an individual’s assessment of quality of own life according to a criterion chosen in a certain way. Several approaches to measuring life satisfaction in the settlement are introduced: approaches in which satisfaction with life is measured on the basis of one indicator, and approaches in which several indicators are used. If satisfaction with life is measured by one direct question, it is one indicator, but in the case of several statements that the respondent evaluates on a certain scale, each statement is a separate indicator. In the further analysis of the collected data such indicators can be analyzed separately or simultaneously by building a general index. Based on the interpretation of the concept of “living conditions”, this article identifi es three objectives for a system of indicators of living conditions of united territorial communities (UTC): monitoring of living conditions, identifying key problems for UTC and comparing diff erent UTCs on the basis of living conditions of the local population. For the fi rst and third objectives, among the possible sources of information, data from registers are offered, and for the second purpose we off er expert surveys, focus group discussions, open group discussions. The problems of data representation are also discussed in this article. Despite the data being quite fragmented, the format of their presentation should be easy for users (both local authorities and community activists and the media). One possible way to present such data is the format used within methodology of citizen report cards.\",\"PeriodicalId\":210079,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Demography and social economy\",\"volume\":\"34 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2021-03-15\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Demography and social economy\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.15407/DSE2021.01.101\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Demography and social economy","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.15407/DSE2021.01.101","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

该条的相关性源于需要在地方一级收集和整理有关人口生活条件的可靠客观信息。对联合领土社区(UTC)人口生活状况的可靠估计是经济和社会政策管理决策的必要条件。这篇文章的目的是讨论在地方一级组织和使用人口生活条件指标系统的原则。为了达到这一目的,一般的科学方法被使用,即泛化法和系统法。该条的新颖之处在于,它以一套指标系统的形式,提出了将地方一级的生活条件信息系统化的原则,并确定了这一系统的任务,以及执行这些任务所需的数据来源。根据乌克兰的做法,“生活条件”被定义为生活质量的一个组成部分,其中包括三组指标:住房供应情况、住房质量特征以及社会基础设施的发展水平和可及性。此外,为了考虑到欧洲在地方一级研究人口生活条件的经验,以便主观地评价住区中当地人口的生活满意度,在指标系统中加入了一个特别的部分。本文的重点是主观部分,即衡量社区生活满意度的能力,以及在地方一级生活条件指标系统内使用这种主观评估的方法。对住区生活的满意度被定义为个人根据以某种方式选择的标准对自己生活质量的评估。介绍了几种衡量定居点生活满意度的方法:基于一个指标衡量生活满意度的方法,以及使用多个指标的方法。如果对生活的满意度是通过一个直接的问题来衡量的,它是一个指标,但在几个陈述的情况下,被调查者在一定的范围内评估,每个陈述都是一个单独的指标。在进一步分析收集到的数据时,这些指标可以单独分析,也可以通过建立一个综合指数来同时分析。根据对“生活条件”概念的解释,本文确定了联合领土社区生活条件指标系统的三个目标:监测生活条件,确定联合领土社区的关键问题,并根据当地人口的生活条件比较不同的联合领土社区。为了第一个和第三个目标,在可能的信息来源中,提供了来自登记册的数据,为了第二个目的,我们进行了专家调查、焦点小组讨论、公开小组讨论。本文还讨论了数据表示的问题。尽管数据相当分散,但它们的呈现格式应该便于用户(包括地方当局、社区活动人士和媒体)使用。呈现这种数据的一种可能方法是公民报告卡方法中使用的格式。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
System of Indicators for Living Conditions of the Population at the Local Level: Principles of Organization and Use
The relevance of the article stems from the need to collect and systemize reliable objective information about living conditions of the population at the local level. A necessary condition for managerial decision-making in economy and social policy is reliable estimation of the population’s living conditions united territorial communities (UTC). The article aims to cover the principles of organization and use of a system of indicators for living conditions of the population at the local level. To achieve this aim, general scientifi c methods are used, namely the method of generalization and the system method. The novelty of the article is the formulation of the principles of systematization of information on living conditions at the local level in the form of a system of indicators and the defi nition the tasks of such a system, as well as data sources for implementation these tasks. Based on Ukrainian approaches, “living conditions” are defi ned as a component of quality of life, which includes three groups of indicators: housing availability, quality characteristics of housing and the level of development and accessibility of social infrastructure. Also, to take into account the European experience of studying the living conditions of the population at the local level, for subjective assessments of satisfaction with life of the local population in the settlement, a particular section is introduced in the system of indicators. The focus of this article is on the subjective component, namely the ability to measure life satisfaction in the community and ways to use such subjective assessments within the system of indicators of living conditions at the local level. Satisfaction with life in the settlement is defi ned as an individual’s assessment of quality of own life according to a criterion chosen in a certain way. Several approaches to measuring life satisfaction in the settlement are introduced: approaches in which satisfaction with life is measured on the basis of one indicator, and approaches in which several indicators are used. If satisfaction with life is measured by one direct question, it is one indicator, but in the case of several statements that the respondent evaluates on a certain scale, each statement is a separate indicator. In the further analysis of the collected data such indicators can be analyzed separately or simultaneously by building a general index. Based on the interpretation of the concept of “living conditions”, this article identifi es three objectives for a system of indicators of living conditions of united territorial communities (UTC): monitoring of living conditions, identifying key problems for UTC and comparing diff erent UTCs on the basis of living conditions of the local population. For the fi rst and third objectives, among the possible sources of information, data from registers are offered, and for the second purpose we off er expert surveys, focus group discussions, open group discussions. The problems of data representation are also discussed in this article. Despite the data being quite fragmented, the format of their presentation should be easy for users (both local authorities and community activists and the media). One possible way to present such data is the format used within methodology of citizen report cards.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信