管理自由裁量权与公司治理实践

J. Hendry
{"title":"管理自由裁量权与公司治理实践","authors":"J. Hendry","doi":"10.2139/ssrn.2029289","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"On one hand, managers, and especially CEOs, are hired and paid to exercise their managerial discretion. On the other hand, within the agency theory approaches to corporate governance, managerial discretion is a source of moral hazard to be removed by incentives or monitoring. In this paper we draw on in-depth interviews with FTSE 100 CEOs and chairmen to enhance understanding of the corporate governance problematic by clearly distinguishing between different kinds of discretion, establishing the part each plays in corporate governance theory and practice and exploring the problems that arise from the difficulty of distinguishing in practice between them. We conclude that the different kinds of discretion that come into play as we move from a formal agency problem to the real-life problems of corporate governance both disrupt the logic and destroy the practical effectiveness of incentive and monitoring measures derived from the formal theory.","PeriodicalId":448402,"journal":{"name":"Corporate Governance & Sociology or Psychology eJournal","volume":"5 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2012-02-29","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Managerial Discretion and the Practice of Corporate Governance\",\"authors\":\"J. Hendry\",\"doi\":\"10.2139/ssrn.2029289\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"On one hand, managers, and especially CEOs, are hired and paid to exercise their managerial discretion. On the other hand, within the agency theory approaches to corporate governance, managerial discretion is a source of moral hazard to be removed by incentives or monitoring. In this paper we draw on in-depth interviews with FTSE 100 CEOs and chairmen to enhance understanding of the corporate governance problematic by clearly distinguishing between different kinds of discretion, establishing the part each plays in corporate governance theory and practice and exploring the problems that arise from the difficulty of distinguishing in practice between them. We conclude that the different kinds of discretion that come into play as we move from a formal agency problem to the real-life problems of corporate governance both disrupt the logic and destroy the practical effectiveness of incentive and monitoring measures derived from the formal theory.\",\"PeriodicalId\":448402,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Corporate Governance & Sociology or Psychology eJournal\",\"volume\":\"5 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2012-02-29\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"1\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Corporate Governance & Sociology or Psychology eJournal\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.2029289\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Corporate Governance & Sociology or Psychology eJournal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.2029289","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

摘要

一方面,经理们,尤其是首席执行官们,被雇佣来行使他们的管理自由裁量权。另一方面,在代理理论的公司治理方法中,管理自由裁量权是道德风险的一个来源,需要通过激励或监督来消除。本文通过对富时100指数成分股公司首席执行官和董事长的深度访谈,明确区分不同类型的自由裁量权,确立每种自由裁量权在公司治理理论和实践中的作用,并探讨在实践中难以区分它们所产生的问题,从而加深对公司治理问题的理解。我们得出的结论是,当我们从正式的代理问题转向公司治理的现实问题时,不同种类的自由裁量权发挥了作用,既破坏了逻辑,也破坏了从形式理论推导出的激励和监督措施的实际有效性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Managerial Discretion and the Practice of Corporate Governance
On one hand, managers, and especially CEOs, are hired and paid to exercise their managerial discretion. On the other hand, within the agency theory approaches to corporate governance, managerial discretion is a source of moral hazard to be removed by incentives or monitoring. In this paper we draw on in-depth interviews with FTSE 100 CEOs and chairmen to enhance understanding of the corporate governance problematic by clearly distinguishing between different kinds of discretion, establishing the part each plays in corporate governance theory and practice and exploring the problems that arise from the difficulty of distinguishing in practice between them. We conclude that the different kinds of discretion that come into play as we move from a formal agency problem to the real-life problems of corporate governance both disrupt the logic and destroy the practical effectiveness of incentive and monitoring measures derived from the formal theory.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信