互联网流量形成的本地和全球影响

M. Marcon, Marcel Dischinger, K. Gummadi, Amin Vahdat
{"title":"互联网流量形成的本地和全球影响","authors":"M. Marcon, Marcel Dischinger, K. Gummadi, Amin Vahdat","doi":"10.1109/COMSNETS.2011.5716420","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The Internet is witnessing explosive growth in traffic, in large part due to bulk transfers. Delivering such traffic is expensive for ISPs because they pay other ISPs based on peak utilization. To limit costs, many ISPs are deploying ad-hoc traffic shaping policies that specifically target bulk flows. However, there is relatively little understanding today about the effectiveness of different shaping policies at reducing peak loads and what impact these policies have on the performance of bulk transfers. In this paper, we compare several traffic shaping policies with respect to (1) the achieved reduction in peak network traffic and (2) the resulting performance loss for bulk transfers. We identified a practical policy that achieves peak traffic reductions of up to 50% with only limited performance loss for bulk transfers. However, we found that the same policy leads to large performance losses for bulk transfers when deployed by multiple ISPs along a networking path. Our analysis revealed that this is caused by certain TCP characteristics and differences in local peak utilization times.","PeriodicalId":302678,"journal":{"name":"2011 Third International Conference on Communication Systems and Networks (COMSNETS 2011)","volume":"293 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2011-02-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"52","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The local and global effects of traffic shaping in the internet\",\"authors\":\"M. Marcon, Marcel Dischinger, K. Gummadi, Amin Vahdat\",\"doi\":\"10.1109/COMSNETS.2011.5716420\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"The Internet is witnessing explosive growth in traffic, in large part due to bulk transfers. Delivering such traffic is expensive for ISPs because they pay other ISPs based on peak utilization. To limit costs, many ISPs are deploying ad-hoc traffic shaping policies that specifically target bulk flows. However, there is relatively little understanding today about the effectiveness of different shaping policies at reducing peak loads and what impact these policies have on the performance of bulk transfers. In this paper, we compare several traffic shaping policies with respect to (1) the achieved reduction in peak network traffic and (2) the resulting performance loss for bulk transfers. We identified a practical policy that achieves peak traffic reductions of up to 50% with only limited performance loss for bulk transfers. However, we found that the same policy leads to large performance losses for bulk transfers when deployed by multiple ISPs along a networking path. Our analysis revealed that this is caused by certain TCP characteristics and differences in local peak utilization times.\",\"PeriodicalId\":302678,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"2011 Third International Conference on Communication Systems and Networks (COMSNETS 2011)\",\"volume\":\"293 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2011-02-17\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"52\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"2011 Third International Conference on Communication Systems and Networks (COMSNETS 2011)\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1109/COMSNETS.2011.5716420\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"2011 Third International Conference on Communication Systems and Networks (COMSNETS 2011)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/COMSNETS.2011.5716420","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 52

摘要

互联网正见证着流量的爆炸式增长,这在很大程度上是由于大量传输。对于互联网服务提供商来说,传输这样的流量是昂贵的,因为他们根据峰值利用率向其他互联网服务提供商付费。为了限制成本,许多互联网服务提供商正在部署专门针对大流量的临时流量塑造策略。然而,对于不同的整形策略在减少峰值负载方面的有效性以及这些策略对批量传输性能的影响,目前的了解相对较少。在本文中,我们从以下方面比较了几种流量塑造策略:(1)峰值网络流量的实现减少和(2)批量传输的性能损失。我们确定了一个实用的策略,可以实现峰值流量减少高达50%,而批量传输的性能损失有限。然而,我们发现,当沿着网络路径由多个isp部署时,相同的策略会导致批量传输的巨大性能损失。我们的分析表明,这是由某些TCP特性和本地峰值利用时间的差异造成的。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
The local and global effects of traffic shaping in the internet
The Internet is witnessing explosive growth in traffic, in large part due to bulk transfers. Delivering such traffic is expensive for ISPs because they pay other ISPs based on peak utilization. To limit costs, many ISPs are deploying ad-hoc traffic shaping policies that specifically target bulk flows. However, there is relatively little understanding today about the effectiveness of different shaping policies at reducing peak loads and what impact these policies have on the performance of bulk transfers. In this paper, we compare several traffic shaping policies with respect to (1) the achieved reduction in peak network traffic and (2) the resulting performance loss for bulk transfers. We identified a practical policy that achieves peak traffic reductions of up to 50% with only limited performance loss for bulk transfers. However, we found that the same policy leads to large performance losses for bulk transfers when deployed by multiple ISPs along a networking path. Our analysis revealed that this is caused by certain TCP characteristics and differences in local peak utilization times.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信