评论与图表

W. Thayer
{"title":"评论与图表","authors":"W. Thayer","doi":"10.2307/j.ctvsf1qgp.19","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This chapter introduces Jacques Derrida, the philosopher who opened up philosophical hermeneutics to its nonhermeneutical limit and spectacular immanence of its terminology with great tenacity. It reviews the status of philosophical terminology that has been transformed while towing philosophical discourse behind it, changing its history into traces. Discourse awakens to its terminology by opening itself up to the virtuality of a language that, in the immanence of its testimony, has no centering function. This chapter also considers the terminological dimension that blocks the referential univocity sustained by frames and final categories. It explains the how totalization and fetishization are revoked of terminological multiplicity through a common preunderstanding or transcendental.","PeriodicalId":225011,"journal":{"name":"Technologies of Critique","volume":"29 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2020-01-07","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Critique and Figure\",\"authors\":\"W. Thayer\",\"doi\":\"10.2307/j.ctvsf1qgp.19\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"This chapter introduces Jacques Derrida, the philosopher who opened up philosophical hermeneutics to its nonhermeneutical limit and spectacular immanence of its terminology with great tenacity. It reviews the status of philosophical terminology that has been transformed while towing philosophical discourse behind it, changing its history into traces. Discourse awakens to its terminology by opening itself up to the virtuality of a language that, in the immanence of its testimony, has no centering function. This chapter also considers the terminological dimension that blocks the referential univocity sustained by frames and final categories. It explains the how totalization and fetishization are revoked of terminological multiplicity through a common preunderstanding or transcendental.\",\"PeriodicalId\":225011,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Technologies of Critique\",\"volume\":\"29 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2020-01-07\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Technologies of Critique\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.2307/j.ctvsf1qgp.19\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Technologies of Critique","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2307/j.ctvsf1qgp.19","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

本章介绍了哲学家雅克·德里达,他以顽强的毅力将哲学诠释学向其非诠释学的极限和其术语的惊人内在打开。它回顾了哲学术语的现状,并将哲学话语拖在身后,将其历史转化为痕迹。话语通过向一种语言的虚拟性开放自己来唤醒它的术语,这种语言在其证词的内在性中没有中心功能。本章还考虑了术语维度,它阻碍了由框架和最终范畴维持的指称单一性。它解释了如何通过共同的预知性或先验来撤销术语多样性的总体化和拜物教化。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Critique and Figure
This chapter introduces Jacques Derrida, the philosopher who opened up philosophical hermeneutics to its nonhermeneutical limit and spectacular immanence of its terminology with great tenacity. It reviews the status of philosophical terminology that has been transformed while towing philosophical discourse behind it, changing its history into traces. Discourse awakens to its terminology by opening itself up to the virtuality of a language that, in the immanence of its testimony, has no centering function. This chapter also considers the terminological dimension that blocks the referential univocity sustained by frames and final categories. It explains the how totalization and fetishization are revoked of terminological multiplicity through a common preunderstanding or transcendental.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信