{"title":"粗粒度数据流代码生成策略的评价","authors":"Wim Böhm, W. Najjar, Bhanu Shankar, L. Roh","doi":"10.1109/PMMP.1993.315554","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Presents top-down and bottom-up methods for generating coarse grain dataflow or multithreaded code, and evaluates their effectiveness. The top-down technique generates clusters directly from the intermediate data dependence graph used for compiler optimizations. Bottom-up techniques coalesce fine-grain dataflow code into clusters. We measure the resulting number of clusters executed, cluster size, and number of inputs per cluster, for Livermore and Purdue benchmarks. The top-down method executes less clusters and instructions, but incurs a higher number of matches per cluster, which exemplifies the need for efficient matching of more than two inputs per cluster.","PeriodicalId":220365,"journal":{"name":"Proceedings of Workshop on Programming Models for Massively Parallel Computers","volume":"10 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1900-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"14","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"An evaluation of coarse grain dataflow code generation strategies\",\"authors\":\"Wim Böhm, W. Najjar, Bhanu Shankar, L. Roh\",\"doi\":\"10.1109/PMMP.1993.315554\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Presents top-down and bottom-up methods for generating coarse grain dataflow or multithreaded code, and evaluates their effectiveness. The top-down technique generates clusters directly from the intermediate data dependence graph used for compiler optimizations. Bottom-up techniques coalesce fine-grain dataflow code into clusters. We measure the resulting number of clusters executed, cluster size, and number of inputs per cluster, for Livermore and Purdue benchmarks. The top-down method executes less clusters and instructions, but incurs a higher number of matches per cluster, which exemplifies the need for efficient matching of more than two inputs per cluster.\",\"PeriodicalId\":220365,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Proceedings of Workshop on Programming Models for Massively Parallel Computers\",\"volume\":\"10 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"1900-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"14\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Proceedings of Workshop on Programming Models for Massively Parallel Computers\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1109/PMMP.1993.315554\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Proceedings of Workshop on Programming Models for Massively Parallel Computers","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/PMMP.1993.315554","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
An evaluation of coarse grain dataflow code generation strategies
Presents top-down and bottom-up methods for generating coarse grain dataflow or multithreaded code, and evaluates their effectiveness. The top-down technique generates clusters directly from the intermediate data dependence graph used for compiler optimizations. Bottom-up techniques coalesce fine-grain dataflow code into clusters. We measure the resulting number of clusters executed, cluster size, and number of inputs per cluster, for Livermore and Purdue benchmarks. The top-down method executes less clusters and instructions, but incurs a higher number of matches per cluster, which exemplifies the need for efficient matching of more than two inputs per cluster.