运用欺诈计划表示、推理和预测欺诈

John K. C. Kingston
{"title":"运用欺诈计划表示、推理和预测欺诈","authors":"John K. C. Kingston","doi":"10.1109/RCIS.2017.7956528","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The efforts of fraudsters to think up new ways of committing fraud, and of law enforcers to detect and prosecute those fraud, often feel like a long-running competition. Yet all too often, law enforcement is accused of falling far behind the fraudsters, especially in situations where the responsibility for detecting frauds falls on non-specialists in security or on the general public.","PeriodicalId":193156,"journal":{"name":"2017 11th International Conference on Research Challenges in Information Science (RCIS)","volume":"28 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2017-05-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"6","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Representing, reasoning and predicting fraud using fraud plans\",\"authors\":\"John K. C. Kingston\",\"doi\":\"10.1109/RCIS.2017.7956528\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"The efforts of fraudsters to think up new ways of committing fraud, and of law enforcers to detect and prosecute those fraud, often feel like a long-running competition. Yet all too often, law enforcement is accused of falling far behind the fraudsters, especially in situations where the responsibility for detecting frauds falls on non-specialists in security or on the general public.\",\"PeriodicalId\":193156,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"2017 11th International Conference on Research Challenges in Information Science (RCIS)\",\"volume\":\"28 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2017-05-10\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"6\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"2017 11th International Conference on Research Challenges in Information Science (RCIS)\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1109/RCIS.2017.7956528\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"2017 11th International Conference on Research Challenges in Information Science (RCIS)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/RCIS.2017.7956528","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 6

摘要

欺诈者想出新的欺诈方法,执法人员发现并起诉这些欺诈行为,这些努力常常让人感觉像是一场长期的竞争。然而,执法部门常常被指责远远落后于欺诈者,特别是在侦查欺诈的责任落在非专业安全人员或普通公众身上的情况下。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Representing, reasoning and predicting fraud using fraud plans
The efforts of fraudsters to think up new ways of committing fraud, and of law enforcers to detect and prosecute those fraud, often feel like a long-running competition. Yet all too often, law enforcement is accused of falling far behind the fraudsters, especially in situations where the responsibility for detecting frauds falls on non-specialists in security or on the general public.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信