{"title":"承包人履行实验设计和技术工作的合同,因执行合同规定的工作量较少而履行合同","authors":"D. Korotkov","doi":"10.17072/2619-0648-2018-4-76-83","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"the author considers the issue of execution by the parties of a contract for the implementation of experimental design and technological works, the issues of determining the essential conditions of this agreement, its place in the treaty system, and the scope of application of this contractual design in various sectors of the domestic and foreign economy. The article analyzes the situation in which the contractor for the contract for the execution of experimental design and technological work achieves the agreed purpose of the agreement by the parties, but achieves this through the implementation of not all, but only part of the items agreed upon in the contract. Author's judgments about the illegality of the position of the customer are given, which refuses to pay the remuneration to the contractor, arguing that the contractor did not complete the entire scope of the work provided for by the contract, but only a part of it.","PeriodicalId":425086,"journal":{"name":"Ex jure","volume":"77 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1900-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"ACHIEVEMENT OF THE CONTRACT BY THE CONTRACTOR FOR THE CONTRACT FOR PERFORMANCE OF EXPERIMENTAL DESIGN AND TECHNOLOGICAL WORK DUE TO THE IMPLEMENTATION OF A SMALLER AMOUNT OF WORK PROVIDED FOR BY THE CONTRACT\",\"authors\":\"D. Korotkov\",\"doi\":\"10.17072/2619-0648-2018-4-76-83\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"the author considers the issue of execution by the parties of a contract for the implementation of experimental design and technological works, the issues of determining the essential conditions of this agreement, its place in the treaty system, and the scope of application of this contractual design in various sectors of the domestic and foreign economy. The article analyzes the situation in which the contractor for the contract for the execution of experimental design and technological work achieves the agreed purpose of the agreement by the parties, but achieves this through the implementation of not all, but only part of the items agreed upon in the contract. Author's judgments about the illegality of the position of the customer are given, which refuses to pay the remuneration to the contractor, arguing that the contractor did not complete the entire scope of the work provided for by the contract, but only a part of it.\",\"PeriodicalId\":425086,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Ex jure\",\"volume\":\"77 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"1900-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Ex jure\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.17072/2619-0648-2018-4-76-83\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Ex jure","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.17072/2619-0648-2018-4-76-83","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
ACHIEVEMENT OF THE CONTRACT BY THE CONTRACTOR FOR THE CONTRACT FOR PERFORMANCE OF EXPERIMENTAL DESIGN AND TECHNOLOGICAL WORK DUE TO THE IMPLEMENTATION OF A SMALLER AMOUNT OF WORK PROVIDED FOR BY THE CONTRACT
the author considers the issue of execution by the parties of a contract for the implementation of experimental design and technological works, the issues of determining the essential conditions of this agreement, its place in the treaty system, and the scope of application of this contractual design in various sectors of the domestic and foreign economy. The article analyzes the situation in which the contractor for the contract for the execution of experimental design and technological work achieves the agreed purpose of the agreement by the parties, but achieves this through the implementation of not all, but only part of the items agreed upon in the contract. Author's judgments about the illegality of the position of the customer are given, which refuses to pay the remuneration to the contractor, arguing that the contractor did not complete the entire scope of the work provided for by the contract, but only a part of it.